IRISHDODGER
Blue Chip Recruit
- Messages
- 8,034
- Reaction score
- 6,098
Blame Landow!Micah Shrewsberry tear his Achilles now?!
You can’t make this shit up.
Blame Landow!Micah Shrewsberry tear his Achilles now?!
You can’t make this shit up.
I think most fans think that but listening to Tom Noie (longtime ND basketball beat writer for SBT), he thinks he gets another year maybe two. His contention is that ND still doesn’t spend on the level of programs competing at the D1 level. He stated that ND has shown a similar commitment as schools like BC, Pitt & WF and not coincidentally; their records are similar.I mean he has to be fired right?
Well.....it's comical is it not?Commentators almost laughing about the greatest thrashing .... ouch.
I mean it would probably be smart for them to do so. Unless they like to lose which seems to be the trendGiven the state of the program, it will be extremely hard to keep anyone from transferring.
End of the day we're a football school. I'm sure the athletic department has made the calculations that their money and energy is better spent on football.I think most fans think that but listening to Tom Noie (longtime ND basketball beat writer for SBT), he thinks he gets another year maybe two. His contention is that ND still doesn’t spend on the level of programs competing at the D1 level. He stated that ND has shown a similar commitment as schools like BC, Pitt & WF and not coincidentally; their records are similar.
I think that’s well understood by the majority of the fanbase & administration. Still no excuse to not invest more than the moribund programs in the conference. I agree it appears that a better HC would solve that but I’ll defer to Noie whose been on that beat for decades.End of the day we're a football school. I'm sure the athletic department has made the calculations that their money and energy is better spent on football.
Yes there are schools that are able to succeed at both, but given other structural headwinds our basketball program faces, I'm not entirely clear it is worth the investment it would take to truly compete at a high level. Especially in the new world order of NIL and open transfers. And especially if it robs dollars from the many other programs that are quite competitive, where you can get more bang for your buck.
Still, we should be better than we are. The trick is finding a coach who can succeed within the parameters of Notre Dame.
Agree on being a FB school, but politely disagree, with the rest. After FB, isn't BB the next biggest generator of revenue? Increase BB revenue you increase more funds for other programs.End of the day we're a football school. I'm sure the athletic department has made the calculations that their money and energy is better spent on football.
Yes there are schools that are able to succeed at both, but given other structural headwinds our basketball program faces, I'm not entirely clear it is worth the investment it would take to truly compete at a high level. Especially in the new world order of NIL and open transfers. And especially if it robs dollars from the many other programs that are quite competitive, where you can get more bang for your buck.
Still, we should be better than we are. The trick is finding a coach who can succeed within the parameters of Notre Dame.
Given the state of the program, it will be extremely hard to keep anyone from transferring.
End of the day we're a football school. I'm sure the athletic department has made the calculations that their money and energy is better spent on football.
Yes there are schools that are able to succeed at both, but given other structural headwinds our basketball program faces, I'm not entirely clear it is worth the investment it would take to truly compete at a high level. Especially in the new world order of NIL and open transfers. And especially if it robs dollars from the many other programs that are quite competitive, where you can get more bang for your buck.
Still, we should be better than we are. The trick is finding a coach who can succeed within the parameters of Notre Dame.
Notre Dame can be as good as Michigan or Purdue.
How much revenue does our basketball program generate? I’ve no clear idea.Agree on being a FB school, but politely disagree, with the rest. After FB, isn't BB the next biggest generator of revenue? Increase BB revenue you increase more funds for other programs.
Oh, that’s why. Got it.Because this team is terrible and probably the worst Notre Dame team I can remember
That’s always a good time to can the coach. This season has Ty Willingham year three vibes. Is an Urban Meyer level coach out there waiting for us so we can can Shrews for a reason besides he sucks ass?worst home loss in ND history - absolutely brutal
I’ll even take Chris Ass!I’d be willing to try Chris Ash at this point.
As a fan, I understand but he ain’t getting fired anytime soon.I simply don't know how you can retain him after last night. If they were playing inspired basketball. Playing hard. In games, keep him. This is only going to get worse unfortunately. I just don't understand. He was a X/O savant at Penn State. I am flabbergasted on bad he and the team has been. Taking his son, was his first mistake...
I was surprised to learn that ND one of the top 10 winningest programs of all time. To be fair, that’s not winning %age…just wins. But I was still pleasantly surprised. They’ve had two top five draft picks: Austin Carr (#1 overall) & LaPhonso Ellis (#5 overall). They also have one Hall-of-Famer in Adrian Dantley. All that doesn’t sound like a lot. Compare it to other schools & you’ll be pleasantly surprised.I don't buy the recruiting side or funding argument. Maybe by rankings measure the recruiting has been an improvement but I just don't buy that we outbid top schools for the recruits we've gotten and that Shrews actually has better talent. It's much more likely schools identified weaknesses and deficiencies in these players that we also identified but we're willing to accept (because this is ND basketball we're talking about). Go look at the top historical recruits we've signed since the start of this century. Not a single one has had real success professionally in the NBA or even at another school. Our only legitimate NBA player over the last 20 years has been Pat Connaughton. Blame the coaches but imo this is more an indictment against what ND is as an athletic destination when it doesn't have tradition and historical success to fall back on. Strip those aspects and we're a tough academic and very religious school in the middle of northwest Indiana. Comparisons to Michigan, IU, Purdue or Syracuse are apt given the weather situation but fail to highlight that those schools have had historical basketball success. We don't have that and to act like we can just flip a switch and start recruiting and signing legit star recruits or transfers with funding is asinine to me.
The only reason you can have hope is cuz IU just did this in football but that's basically the type of turnaround we're talking about. Which is to say, extremely unlikely to ever occur.
I don't buy the recruiting side or funding argument. Maybe by rankings measure the recruiting has been an improvement but I just don't buy that we outbid top schools for the recruits we've gotten and that Shrews actually has better talent. It's much more likely schools identified weaknesses and deficiencies in these players