- Messages
- 19,127
- Reaction score
- 11,075
I'm in the same boat. Everyone was wowed when we landed Hartman, and he was a good QB, but I also think he was hamstrung with a poor OC and having to learn a new system. I think Leonard is a great QB, but how do we know he's going to pickup the Denbrock system and excel? He's already going to be behind the other QBs as he's had the least amount of reps due to his injury. Why is he necessarily going to be better than the ACC all time passing leader? I know he was brought in with the expectation that he's the starter, but we clearly have an improved QB room compared to years past. There's a lot of talent there, I don't think Leonard should be a lock unless he manages to be that much better than what we have. I think we should be getting Carr snaps in some capacity ala Chris Leak/Tim Tebow.
I think it’s the optimism over how Leonard might fit what Jayden Daniels was able to do in Denbrock’s offense as a dual-threat guy.
Daniels obviously skews to “passer that can run,” while Leonard so far looks like “runner that can throw,” but Denbrock’s offense will obviously fit Leonard as long as Leonard can target certain areas of the field consistently in obvious passing situations.
The playaction opportunities, opportunities to hit easy high-percentage stuff underneath, and opportunities to create lanes for Leonard to use his legs in big situations should all be there. And Leonard is a more-proven commodity than everyone else on the roster to this point, as well.
I think it’s Leonard’s job to lose, more than a competition
