- Messages
- 27,770
- Reaction score
- 10,153
Wow.
You are comparing 5th year seniors and a seniors, to sophomores and freshman. Of course there will be some drop off, they have been in the system for multiple years longer, DUH! It’s happened with, literally, every succession on the OL, every time. But it’s only initially. Then those players mature, perfect their craft, and become the seniors that leave for the draft. Big Mike and Nelson weren’t this good as freshman and sophomores. . OBVIOUSLY. I’d think an OL coach would know that
I fully expect to see some sort of drop off initially in play, that’s to be expected. It’s happened every time. Stanley wasn’t as good as Martin at first. Mike wasn’t as good as Stanley at first, still might not be in pass pro. It’s a game of maturation. But this years recruiting class has absolutely nothing to do with how we’ll play Michigan or next season in general. Because if you are worried about sophomores playing against Gary, he’d have a field day with freshman.
So could this class be an issue in multiple years? It could. But that’s TBD. If we land Carroll, Olmstead, etc. We’ll just continue to have the same succession plan as always. Those guys will be on the path to playing around their sophomore/junior years.
And for comparison, all of Lugg, Banks, Hainsey, Eich and Kraemer were rated higher than Big Mike. ALL of them. Are they as good right now, as he is. Of course not, he’s a 5th year senior.
For comparison, all of Eich, Kraemer, Lugg, and Hainsey were rated higher than Stanley coming out of HS.
Not difficult to grasp.
Fun fact, our starting OL next year will more than likely consist of 5 4 star prospects. Then we’ll have a 6th and 7th OL, that were also 4 star prospects. From a recruiting rankings perspective, it will be one of the top rated OL’s in the country. They’ll just need time to gel, like all of the others have in the past.
You are comparing 5th year seniors and a seniors, to sophomores and freshman. Of course there will be some drop off, they have been in the system for multiple years longer, DUH! It’s happened with, literally, every succession on the OL, every time. But it’s only initially. Then those players mature, perfect their craft, and become the seniors that leave for the draft. Big Mike and Nelson weren’t this good as freshman and sophomores. . OBVIOUSLY. I’d think an OL coach would know that
I fully expect to see some sort of drop off initially in play, that’s to be expected. It’s happened every time. Stanley wasn’t as good as Martin at first. Mike wasn’t as good as Stanley at first, still might not be in pass pro. It’s a game of maturation. But this years recruiting class has absolutely nothing to do with how we’ll play Michigan or next season in general. Because if you are worried about sophomores playing against Gary, he’d have a field day with freshman.
So could this class be an issue in multiple years? It could. But that’s TBD. If we land Carroll, Olmstead, etc. We’ll just continue to have the same succession plan as always. Those guys will be on the path to playing around their sophomore/junior years.
And for comparison, all of Lugg, Banks, Hainsey, Eich and Kraemer were rated higher than Big Mike. ALL of them. Are they as good right now, as he is. Of course not, he’s a 5th year senior.
For comparison, all of Eich, Kraemer, Lugg, and Hainsey were rated higher than Stanley coming out of HS.
Not difficult to grasp.
Fun fact, our starting OL next year will more than likely consist of 5 4 star prospects. Then we’ll have a 6th and 7th OL, that were also 4 star prospects. From a recruiting rankings perspective, it will be one of the top rated OL’s in the country. They’ll just need time to gel, like all of the others have in the past.