phgreek
New member
- Messages
- 6,956
- Reaction score
- 433
White males! Sheesh.
The foreign policy experts and gurus would be a little more convincing if they were consistently right about anything.
Who is it that we are supposed to be trusting regarding our foreign policy with Russia? We've been all over the place lately, and the CIA and NATO have been pretty darn active in that part of the world for a long time. It's hard for me to understand how Russia is supposed to act. Especially when (arguably) ethnically and historically Russian Crimea is involved.
It's like the Iraq war. It was supposed to be proof that toppling bad guys and trying to nation-build was a bad idea, yet we supported the same things in Lybia and Egypt, and want to do it again in Syria. Dems and Republicans are all over the place on these issues.
Without giving trump credit where none is due, is there really some clear guiding principle that Clinton is applying that makes so much sense of the situation?
Absolutely...She has a (D) next to her name.
As I've said before, for all the bitching about George Bush (W) and Iraq, Clinton did it AFTER. She not only oversaw fucking up a basically calm Iraq, but then added more on with Libya. She apparently saw Russia much the same as Mr. Obama, and thought them so "80s", and offered up a so two thousands schtick with the easy button / reset button. Crooked, poor judgement, stupid optics...awesome! I'd vote for a monkey before I'd vote for her, because with a monkey you have a random chance of the correct answer, and EXCEEDING expectations. With her, even when she isn't A) compromised by leaked email; B) compromised by Clinton foundation entanglements; C) compromised by shit we don't even know about yet; she'll still get it WRONG, and look like a fucking moron doing it.