gkIrish
Greek God
- Messages
- 13,184
- Reaction score
- 1,004
I'm wondering if any of the Sanders supporters are disappointed in his rigorous endorsement of Clinton?
Sanders stood for:
Being against Wall Street: Rigorously endorses Clinton, who is joined at the hip with Wall Street.
Being against the corruption in Washington: endorses the most politically corrupt candidate since.......................... Bill Clinton?
It seems to me that Sanders abandoned just about everything he stood for, to endorse Clinton. I get the "party unity" thing, but Sanders was also supposed to be a guy who would put the "little people" first. Now he is just doing what every other career politician would do. He could easily scream from the mountaintops about how bad Trump is, without talking up Hillary. I think you just have to wonder if Sanders hasn't turned out to be just like almost every other politician, and traded his support for some kind of deal that enriches him?
I think he knows his supporters aren't going to vote for Hillary just because he speaks negatively about Trump. He had to convince them to vote for her to prevent a Trump victory.