- Messages
- 27,770
- Reaction score
- 10,153
I think it might have been a Rivals article or PC that I was thinking about (where someone said they expect him to grow quickly into a SDE). Only so much stock you can put into the different depth charts... But like I said, I could have easily confused him with another as whatever it was, it was back when he got PT I think in September. I still could have sworn that he went in for Kareem. That's what is driving me nuts.
The depth chart above (in the ISD article) is the one released from the ND athletic department. Really the only one that matters. I have no idea why Rivals would have a different depth chart. Stuff gets weird over there.
Pretty sure a majority of his snaps versus Wake were at Drop. Same for against VT when Hayes didn't travel.
He very well may have substituted in for Kareem on some occasion or several but not that doesn't mean he's a SDE. Heck, Kareem has lined up as a 0T before, doesn't mean he's a NT. We run a variety of fronts and move the guys around. We'll put Okwara and Hayes on both edges, doesn't mean we run a 3-4. In the base, Justin is a Drop. That could change, but if we land Foskey I doubt it happens. For balance we want Justin to stick at Drop so the 20' depth chart is Justin/Nana and Ade/Foskey.