T-Boone
Well-known member
- Messages
- 8,401
- Reaction score
- 4,798
Not trying to be a jerk but who are the other teams? I can’t recall except maybe OSU 2014
Florida - Tebow.
Not trying to be a jerk but who are the other teams? I can’t recall except maybe OSU 2014
It is staggering how bad that is. The coaching is clearly subpar but good grief, how could it be that bad? Quinn needs to take the last train to Clarksville. Should have after the Ball State game like the Cowboys did in their bye week.
And I agree whole heartedly. The offensive line is by far the engine of any offense.
I assume you are talking about FO’s offensive line rankings. They are basically a mix of run success rate (the line does not get credit for big runs) and the pass protection rankings are 100% based on sack rate. Those are going to underrate the OL for an offense like ND that uses the run game to make big plays in exchange for a high stuff rate. Also a QB who runs out of bounds for 1, 0, or -1 yards instead of chucking the ball OOB is going to kill his OL’s rating even if it doesn’t have a negative effect on his team.
Not trying to be a jerk but who are the other teams? I can’t recall except maybe OSU 2014
They won with their third string qb, I believe. I can't remember who the QB's were when LSU won theirs.
The thing is, I get losing two first round picks and Bars getting injured in a vacuum. But ND should be able to reload at O-line each and every year. O line, TE, QB should be our bread and butter.
A few thoughts:Going to give Quinn another year before I start bashing. I mean we did lose two 1st rounders. But I did expect better.
I'm using FO, but I don't believe it's 100% based on sack. There are separate sack ratings. I'll look closer later. But let's be honest. Running ratings suck worse than passing. If running sucks that bad, are you telling me pass blocking could be that much better. Logically doesn't compute. Other services besides FO say we suck too in both running and passing. Any way you slice it, the OL is just not good. I'd ask you what stats out there say they are good in either phase. Book's quick release and dink and dunk short stuff were the only reason the numbers weren't far worse.
Bama's won most of their championships with non-elite QBs, and there's a lot of examples during their reign. But OSU with a QB by committee, LSU with Flynn, FL with Tim Tebow (you can argue if he is elite or not), FL with Leak, OSU with Kenzel,... and I can go on. Needless to say, it is rarer to win a NC with a sub top 50 line, than it is with non-elite QB.
Flynn with LSU.
2015 team had McG, Q, Mustipher and Bars playing and finished 4-8......just saying
Going to give Quinn another year before I start bashing. I mean we did lose two 1st rounders. But I did expect better.
I'm using FO, but I don't believe it's 100% based on sack. There are separate sack ratings. I'll look closer later. But let's be honest. Running ratings suck worse than passing. If running sucks that bad, are you telling me pass blocking could be that much better. Logically doesn't compute. Other services besides FO say we suck too in both running and passing. Any way you slice it, the OL is just not good. I'd ask you what stats out there say they are good in either phase. Book's quick release and dink and dunk short stuff were the only reason the numbers weren't far worse.
Bama's won most of their championships with non-elite QBs, and there's a lot of examples during their reign. But OSU with a QB by committee, LSU with Flynn, FL with Tim Tebow (you can argue if he is elite or not), FL with Leak, OSU with Kenzel,... and I can go on. Needless to say, it is rarer to win a NC with a sub top 50 line, than it is with non-elite QB.
Flynn with LSU.
You better be thrilled if he gets beat out. I know I hope it happens. I'm always for the best player playing.
.
That team also hadn’t that POS Van Gorder for D coordinator which became too much to overcome. Had plenty of close games and should have been an easy 8win season but it was a team effort led by the crappy D. I remember Vaughn playing really well as a freshman at CB. Too bad he is worse now.
A few thoughts:
-Alabama won without elite QBs because they had the most talented rosters and depth in CFB. Head and shoulders above everyone else until Clemson started catching up.
-Tebow was elite are you kidding me? A Heisman trophy winner and 2x Heisman finalist? Tebow was 35-5 as a starter. He was an elite college QB.
Last year ND averaged #35 across their nine OL categories.
The pass ratings are 100% based on sacks allowed. It’s separated out by down situation (e.g. sack rate on passing downs vs. standard downs). They are opponent adjusted.
out of curiosity, i just looked at OL ratings for all teams with top 10 QBR quarterbacks.
ND by far has the worst OL stats. and Book is #8 in QBR. so in other words, in spite of the worst OL by far in the top 10, Book was still one of the best in the country. i'd bet it's similar if I went and looked at 11-25.
again, not saying he's an elite QB. i'm saying he's disadvantaged a ton from the start, and no one can say what his ceiling is, or compare him to other QBs or programs without taking into consideration how bad the line has been.
I'm wore out just reading this.
You better be thrilled if he gets beat out. I know I hope it happens. I'm always for the best player playing.
.
I agree about the best player playing, and I am looking forward to the best person earning the spot. Kelly should absolutely start that best person whether it be Book or Jurkovec. I'm sure Jurkovec envisioned the possibilities he could achieve when he was the first person to walk out on the field in Texas. It had to be symbolic for him as a competitor. But I'm also sure Book experienced those hard knocks on the field against Clemson, took them personally, and is determined to not let that performance be his last note at ND. Competition will hopefully create excellence from both.
I do not believe it accurately rated ND’s offensive line last year and assumed there was a consensus that the 2017 unit was elite. Maybe you disagree and think that ND had a slightly below average offensive line for a P5 team in 2017.
If you use a lot of zone stretch runs that are high risk/reward and have a scrambling QB who generates a lot of short runs and extra sacks instead of a cement shoes guy who doesn’t extend plays and just throws it away then your OL is going to be systematically underrated by this algorithm.
Florida - Tebow.
In retrospect, the SI cover was the kiss of death.
Tebow may be a poor traditional QB but he’s one of the best cfb players in history and was a hell of a QB for what Florida was doing... he wasn’t ‘mediocre’
i think of him as one of the baddest assed and most elite ballers of CFB
i think of him as one of the baddest assed and most elite ballers of CFB
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/5cpR6whgsvNhm" width="480" height="441" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/community-season-2-pierce-hawthorne-5cpR6whgsvNhm">via GIPHY</a></p>Book didn’t lose his chance to be starter when camp opens next season, but his play against Clemson should have lost him any guarantee he’ll be starter in Week One.
It’s clear you can’t win a title if you don’t have an elite QB in 2019. If Book’s better than PJ, then he’s better. If he isn’t, then I’m not shedding a tear.
He'd be my #1 pick if I was building a college football team this century. Vince Young would be second. Tebow has virtually ZERO downside and I'd go to bed each night as his coach knowing his homework was done and he was home in bed... asleep.
Isn’t that exactly what you want at quarterback?
I know Ian has another year of eligibility after this year, and I THINK there was some thought that he would dart for the NFL after last years performance. I am just wondering what thoughts are about his future with ND next year, after just a few games of 2019???
(I know its early, just wondering)