G
GBdomer
Guest
Chip Kelly's offense is unreal, he played Colt Lyerla at running back for a while.
Redfield mentioned that he needed the right "spiritual fit"...Nothing spiritual about Oregon.
Redfield mentioned that he needed the right "spiritual fit"...Nothing spiritual about Oregon.
To be clear, ND didn't "lose" Armstead or Marshall to UO. IIRC, Marshall was ready to commit to ND on his visit, but we had to turn him away due to grades, and Armstead would be Irish today if his older brother had been cleared medically.
I can't recall a single recruit whom we've legitimately lost to the Ducks.
I have a hard time believing any recruit could truly be 50/50 between UO and ND. Beyond the success both programs are experiencing right now, they're basically polar opposites.
Whiskey, wouldn't Christian French be one?
Christian French
All Notre Dame needs to do is hold off the Oregon rush. Oregon is a true player
To be clear, ND didn't "lose" Armstead or Marshall to UO. IIRC, Marshall was ready to commit to ND on his visit, but we had to turn him away due to grades, and Armstead would be Irish today if his older brother had been cleared medically.
I can't recall a single recruit whom we've legitimately lost to the Ducks.
I have a hard time believing any recruit could truly be 50/50 between UO and ND. Beyond the success both programs are experiencing right now, they're basically polar opposites.
I disagree with this. French was part of the 2011 class not the 2010 class. So BK had over a year to recruit him.I suppose he counts, but that happened during the coaching transition between Weis and Kelly. Could argue the legitimacy of that loss.
Don't you think the job status of Chip Kelly plays a role in this?
(One could hope anyway.)
I disagree with this. French was part of the 2011 class not the 2010 class. So BK had over a year to recruit him.
What do you mean by "legitimately lost to the Ducks"? IIRC, the deciding factor in Arik choosing ND was that we would also take his brother. When we ended up not clearing Armond, and it had become clear that no one would, Arik re-evaluated his options, leaving his bro out of the equation. Then he decided that he liked what Oregon was offering more than he liked what we were offering. I don't see any reason to asterisk that one. He picked Oregon over us.
Or maybe the point is that Arik Armstead was never legitimately interested in ND in the first place for his own sake, and we only had any chance because of his brother? That might be right.
I disagree with this. French was part of the 2011 class not the 2010 class. So BK had over a year to recruit him.
That's a good point. I was excluding Arik because we (allegedly) could have had him, but for a circumstance that was beyond ND's control (Armond's health).
My argument was that very few, if any, recruits end up having UO and ND in their final 2-3, simply because the programs are such polar opposites that most recruits either eliminate or have no interest in one or other much earlier in the process. But Armstead and French seem to contradict that, so maybe I'm wrong.
I saw that he committed in 2010 on his Rivals profile and failed to note the month.
I'm striking out in this thread.
![]()
That's a good point. I was excluding Arik because we (allegedly) could have had him, but for a circumstance that was beyond ND's control (Armond's health).
My argument was that very few, if any, recruits end up having UO and ND in their final 2-3, simply because the programs are such polar opposites that most recruits either eliminate or have no interest in one or other much earlier in the process. But Armstead and French seem to contradict that, so maybe I'm wrong.
I remember sitting at work in anticipation on IE the day he committed. You were not a member then, seems like you have been around forever. So start reading from this link.I saw that he committed in 2010 on his Rivals profile and failed to note the month.
I'm striking out in this thread.
![]()
That wasn't really my point. ND's two big selling points are tradition and academics. Thus, our natural recruiting rivals are those schools who also sell the same things-- like USC and Michigan. We frequently go up against other schools that offer one or other as well-- e.g. OSU (tradition) and Stanford (academics).
Oregon isn't selling either of those things, and it's about as far from ND as any school in the continental US. As the most successful program in the northwest, we'll obviously recruit against them on occasion for kids that live in the area and want to stay close to home, but that's no different from any other part of the country.
But Whiskey I agree with everything you said but Oregon can recruit nationally as well as any one. They are not like USC and ND who can get anyone but Oregon takes kids from the East Coast and Midwest they have hit hard lately.
RB out of TX and a K out of NC; that's it.With the way they've been winning, I don't doubt that they could recruit nationally if they wanted to, but they simply aren't doing it yet. Check out UO's list of current commits. Out of 11 guys, 6 are from CA and 3 are from OR. They plucked a 4RB out of TX and a K out of NC; that's it.
One thing Oregon does better than anybody is find gems in California and I wish we did more of it. There are studs in Cali that are 3 stars that would be 4 stars in some states. Oregon has taken so many 3 stars from California and turned them into studs. Just wish we hit Cali harder.
But Whiskey I agree with everything you said but Oregon can recruit nationally as well as any one. They are not like USC and ND who can get anyone but Oregon takes kids from the East Coast and Midwest they have hit hard lately.
Yes there are Alot if high quality 3 star guys in states like California and Florida but are they academically ready for ND? Oregon has a luxury there that we don't.