SEC Open Thread

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,962
Reaction score
3,315
The parallels between the SEC and the confederacy are definitely there. NIL/revenue sharing is basically the modern day abolitionist movement to these backward ass imbreds. Now that they can't have free labor anymore, they whine and cry and threaten to leave. What's funny is not only have they not won a championship since 2022, they haven't even made the title game since then. SEC, SEC!
stoodent atholeetes.gif
 

dankgesang

Troll Tide
Messages
471
Reaction score
739
That ability has gone down about as much as the Alabama football team on the field.

Must be a coincidence
It's 100% this. As long as they can ostensibly play the role of sage visitor from a land of enlightened football (Saban-era SEC/Alabama) it's all good, but now that the water is finding its level you see what actually lies beneath. They get off on patronizing the board, because they're shitty little guys without a thought in their head and nothing going on in their corner of the football internet. Don't talk to them, don't look at them, and if you're a site owner strongly consider putting them outside with the other animals.
 

pumpdog20

Well-known member
Messages
4,928
Reaction score
3,477
The parallels between the SEC and the confederacy are definitely there. NIL/revenue sharing is basically the modern day abolitionist movement to these backward ass imbreds. Now that they can't have free labor anymore, they whine and cry and threaten to leave. What's funny is not only have they not won a championship since 2022, they haven't even made the title game since then. SEC, SEC!
Kinda weird thing to say, when everyone was accusing them as being the only ones to pay the players prior to NIL.
 

MeanGreenBeans

Well-known member
Messages
859
Reaction score
759
Kinda weird thing to say, when everyone was accusing them as being the only ones to pay the players prior to NIL.
I must've missed the part where the schools themselves were paying players directly pre-NIL/revenue sharing. As far as I know, it was boosters who were funding all of that. Regardless of the source of that money, we're comparing apples (10-20k in a McDonald's bag, a car from the local dealership, etc.) to oranges (six figures plus on the table legally). Considering the scale of what we're seeing now with NIL/revenue sharing, I think we can safely say the old way was using "free labor" for all intents and purposes. And the SEC was the biggest beneficiary of that exploitative system. You think it's just a huge coincidence they haven't made it to the title game since 2022 and they're screaming from the rafters about the current state of college football?
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,897
Reaction score
6,063
“Now have the hot blonde read the proganda to the brainless chimp”


"Why don't other people know what she knows?"

where-banana-blank-meme-template-full-d376c9d7.webp
 

Notre Dame Joe

Active member
Messages
408
Reaction score
234
I must've missed the part where the schools themselves were paying players directly pre-NIL/revenue sharing. As far as I know, it was boosters who were funding all of that. Regardless of the source of that money, we're comparing apples (10-20k in a McDonald's bag, a car from the local dealership, etc.) to oranges (six figures plus on the table legally). Considering the scale of what we're seeing now with NIL/revenue sharing, I think we can safely say the old way was using "free labor" for all intents and purposes. And the SEC was the biggest beneficiary of that exploitative system. You think it's just a huge coincidence they haven't made it to the title game since 2022 and they're screaming from the rafters about the current state of college football?
Are the Boosters not paying it now?
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
17,781
Reaction score
30,777
Revenue sharing comes from the school.

The school is paying out of their revenue, and boosters are donating to the school to make up for their lost revenue.

The main advantage of revenue sharing versus NIL is lack of scrutiny through CSC on rev share contracts. ND can choose to give Ian Premer mostly whatever revenue they want. An NIL deal would theoretically pass through NILGo.
 
Last edited:

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
17,781
Reaction score
30,777
She also invoked the the 9 game SEC schedule, which hasn’t even started yet.
 

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
17,291
Reaction score
17,370
The school is paying out of their revenue, and boosters are donating to the school to make up for their lost revenue.

The main advantage of revenue sharing versus NIL is lack of scrutiny through CSC on rev share contracts. ND can choose to give Ian Premer mostly whatever revenue they want. An NIL deal would theoretically pass through NILGo.

And there already is a cap on rev share correct? The amounts exceeding that have to come from NIL boosters directly and those are subject to NILGo?
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
17,781
Reaction score
30,777
And there already is a cap on rev share correct? The amounts exceeding that have to come from NIL boosters directly and those are subject to NILGo?

Correct so you can probably assume NDs NIL exceeds Revenue Sharing this season.

I would guess they start with some sort of UBI NIL then proceed to rev share and consistent NIL partnerships like Rhoback/Under Armour etc. Anything in excess of that is probably more case by case booster supported.
 
Top