2024 College Football Playoffs

[DomerInHappyValley]

Dr Pepper throw off has been hacked and the throws are awful. Move the line back. Lol

At least they weren't doing the bullshit chest pass.

 

[Jimmy3Putt]

Dr Pepper throw off has been hacked and the throws are awful. Move the line back. Lol

The ACC game contestants haven’t watched the last few years. That was ugly. One guy was sky hooking them.

 

[Wild Bill]

Yeah.

If PSU and Texas were undefeated, I’d get it. But two losses + bad resumes for both those teams means they will fall behind ND.

Texas should have to play on the road for losing to a backup QB.

 

[InKellyWeTrust]

A 7 seed with a matchup against Indiana? Is that the most likely opponent for the 7? Then a potentia 2nd rd matchup with Georgia? I'd honestly take that

 

[irishjim]

As soon as SMU heard the committee chair say that “teams that dont’t play this week will not be adjusted against other teams that didn’t play”, they should have opted out of the ACC championship. They would have remained ahead of Indiana and Alabama in theory,

 

[IRISHDODGER]

2024-25 Selection Committee Roster - College Football Playoff

The official 2024-25 Selection Committee Roster for the College Football Playoff

collegefootballplayoff.com

 

[Blazers46]

The ACC game contestants haven’t watched the last few years. That was ugly. One guy was sky hooking them.

I just hit rewind to watch this one. Yeah that was bad. Lol.

 

[IRISHDODGER]

Did anyone else hear (I think Gary Danielson) say "Alabama has to be feeling good, right? Things have really been breaking their way". The one thing that could possibly hurt them is happening - Clemson beating SMU, meaning Clemson steals a bid. But they know SMU is totally screwed if they lose, because otherwise that comment makes no sense

yes. And then Brad Nessler said in response to Danielson’s comment on “alabama could find a way”….”Don’t they always?”

You could tell Nessler knew it was a controversial topic b/c he said he didn’t want to touch it. LOL

 

[IRISHDODGER]

Yeah.

If PSU and Texas were undefeated, I’d get it. But two losses + bad resumes for both those teams means they will fall behind ND.

I don’t think they will b/c the CFP has been pretty clear that they will not punish losers of CCG for playing an extra game. They have to protect CCG so as long as PSU & UT don’t/didn’t get blown out…they’ll stay above ND. Why? Because in a passive-aggressive fashion they also want to stick it to ND for not playing in a conference (that part is pure conjecture on my part but I’ve been on this earth long enough to know what non-ND fans think about ND football)

 

[Pops Freshenmeyer]

As soon as SMU heard the committee chair say that “teams that dont’t play this week will not be adjusted against other teams that didn’t play”, they should have opted out of the ACC championship. They would have remained ahead of Indiana and Alabama in theory,

If they don’t put SMU in the conferences will turn the CCGs into invitationals where teams in the top 12 can turn down the opportunity. It will be a huge issue.

 

[Jimmy3Putt]

I don’t think they will b/c the CFP has been pretty clear that they will not punish losers of CCG for playing an extra game. They have to protect CCG so as long as PSU & UT don’t/didn’t get blown out…they’ll stay above ND.

It was protecting their spot, not their seeding.

 

[ShamrockOnHelmet]

I don’t think they will b/c the CFP has been pretty clear that they will not punish losers of CCG for playing an extra game. They have to protect CCG so as long as PSU & UT don’t/didn’t get blown out…they’ll stay above ND. Why? Because in a passive-aggressive fashion they also want to stick it to ND for not playing in a conference (that part is pure conjecture on my part but I’ve been on this earth long enough to know what non-ND fans think about ND football)

Dropping them, appropriately, a couple spots isn’t “punishing” them. Punishment would be being out of the playoff. I’m not sure why people are interpreting the comment that way,

 

[wizards8507]

I don’t think they will b/c the CFP has been pretty clear that they will not punish losers of CCG for playing an extra game. They have to protect CCG so as long as PSU & UT don’t/didn’t get blown out…they’ll stay above ND. Why? Because in a passive-aggressive fashion they also want to stick it to ND for not playing in a conference (that part is pure conjecture on my part but I’ve been on this earth long enough to know what non-ND fans think about ND football)

SMU played Houston Christian. They will have 12 FBS games, they don't have "extra" shit.

 

[wizards8507]

If they don’t put SMU in the conferences will turn the CCGs into invitationals where teams in the top 12 can turn down the opportunity. It will be a huge issue.

Bullshit. THEY PLAYED FOR A FIRST ROUND BYE.

The potential upside of the championship game is tremendously valuable.

 

[arndtjc]

I think it’s pretty obvious…ND’s defense is better than any of these teams that played today.

Zero reason they can’t go win four straight

 

[IRISHDODGER]

Dropping them, appropriately, a couple spots isn’t “punishing” them. Punishment would be being out of the playoff. I’m not sure why people are interpreting the comment that way,

I didn’t say they’d be out of the playoff but PSU ain’t dropping below ND. They’ve made that pretty clear thus far. It could change if Oregon turned it on & blew out PSU but that’s not looking to be the case.

 

[IRISHDODGER]

It was protecting their spot, not their seeding.

PSU ain’t dropping below ND

 

[ShamrockOnHelmet]

I didn’t say they’d be out of the playoff but PSU ain’t dropping below ND. They’ve made that pretty clear thus far. It could change if Oregon turned it on & blew out PSU but that’s not looking to be the case.

I don’t think they’ve made that clear at all. 🤷‍♂️

 

[wizards8507]

I didn’t say they’d be out of the playoff but PSU ain’t dropping below ND. They’ve made that pretty clear thus far. It could change if Oregon turned it on & blew out PSU but that’s not looking to be the case.

Not only would PSU drop below us, but they would drop below OSU also.

 

[Huntr]

This is what The Athletic projects at this moment and I'd bet it's correct, if the games finish like they are playing rn.

 

[CoachB]

When do we find out the matchups?

 

[IRISHDODGER]

When do we find out the matchups?

Noon EST tomorrow

 

[wizards8507]

This is what The Athletic projects at this moment and I'd bet it's correct, if the games finish like they are playing rn.

View attachment 3057208

This is what I have too except I'm dropping Penn State more.

When do we find out the matchups?

Tomorrow at noon.

 

[ACamp1900]

If smu makes a run here and just falls short,……

 

[IRISHDODGER]

I don’t think they’ve made that clear at all. 🤷‍♂️

Then why didn’t ND get ranked above them after it was clear that ND was more dominant in games vs common opponents?

 

[TheRealLynch51]

Then why didn’t ND get ranked above them after it was clear that ND was more dominant in games vs common opponents?

Cuz u a hoe

 

[IRISHDODGER]

Cuz u a hoe

Least I ain’t fat like you

 

[IrishTusker]

Then why didn’t ND get ranked above them after it was clear that ND was more dominant in games vs common opponents?

Because PSU hadn't lost. They don't want to drop a team after a win.

 

[ShamrockOnHelmet]

Then why didn’t ND get ranked above them after it was clear that ND was more dominant in games vs common opponents?

I don’t know and they don’t either, nor do you.

 

[arndtjc]

This is what The Athletic projects at this moment and I'd bet it's correct, if the games finish like they are playing rn.

View attachment 3057208

I just don’t see how they justify jumping UGA aaaalllllllll the way to #2 in the country