FDNYIrish1
ARE YOU SUPPORTIVE OF THESE ONESIES???
- Messages
- 3,014
- Reaction score
- 5,228
The shirt is out. I dig it.
Well, I think we've found our problem then.
I think you might be right that MF may have preferred Nike but even if that's true it doesn't mean he was less than thrilled after the new UA deal was finalized.
Everything else I said is backed up by this video I posted in this thread last Aug.
.
.
I then pointed out the takeaway from the video was the following:
So regardless if MF originally preferred Nike, he still had a say in what the next apparel deal should entail, he seems to be very happy with it, and he made it clear that he's willing to talk openly about it to the players and potential recruits.
- MF revealed that he told JS "Part of my discussions with Jack when we started talking about Under Armour... I said, hey, take care of our players," which confirms 2 things: MF had direct discussions with JS about the next apparel deal and that his number 1 concern was "take care of our players" which directly implies NIL.
- The next words out of MF's mouth were, "One of those things is they already did an NIL deal with Sam." The words "those things" in that sentence refer to the things MF was telling JS he wanted UA to do for ND players and he confirmed UA was already doing it. They were already doing an NIL deal with at least one ND player. And since MF said "take care of our player(s)", plural (I don't mean to be pedantic), doing 1 NIL deal with 1 ND player was not going to be enough. He was talking about NIL deals for multiple players.
- The fact that this video was even made and posted to ND's official Twitter account makes it obvious that MF wanted to very publically announce the fact that one primary reason the UA deal was made was to "take care of the players", i.e., NIL.
Your question would make sense if I was focusing on SH giving ND players shoes. I wasn't and it wasn't even remotely part of the point I was making.How does Sam Hartman gifting players UA sneakers--something UA should be doing themselves many times over with the apparel deal anyway--a sign of some glorious NIL deal for ND players? That sounds like it sucks, plus they are UA sneakers anyway.
Your question would make sense if I was focusing on SH giving ND players shoes. I wasn't and it wasn't even remotely part of the point I was making.
SH handing out shoes wasn't his NIL deal with UA. It was a perk but not the deal itself. SH was getting paid. How much? No one knows for sure outside of the parties involved. NIL terms are seldom made public. The point was UA did an NIL deal with SH because he transferred to ND. MF publically stated that NIL was "one of the things" he talked to JS about when it came to finalizing the UA apparel agreement. He wasn't referring to giving out free shoes. He was referring to NIL which means paying players for name/image/likeness.
The Shirt should be navy or green. Gold would also be acceptable, but it can come off as yellow often times. The shirt this year? It's too light, it doesn't fit the color scheme. It's not really a gold, it looks like a piss yellow.
First I come home to find dog shit all over the house because my kid can’t be bothered to interrupt video game time and now this.
Replicas always look like trash.
This seems to confirm the CFB 25 videos that show this exact blue jersey.
UA logo moved to underneath the collar and on the authentic jersey the monogram will be a shiny metallic gold.
From our normal super high end replicas?Looks cheap.
Bring back the Weis tv numbers.
Bruh, the f*ck we gonna complain about for the next 5 weeks!?Will reserve judgment until we see the players wearing them