Two thoughts:It's definitely not an ideal 2023 QB situation - but I think even if CJ Carr stays 2024 - there's a good argument for no **high school QB
2023 boiled down;
TOP TIER - Dante Moore - anyone else that's "elite" - picked one, LOST - this is the failure of the class. But it happened and its realistically over for the top.
OTHER QB's - From Minchey to Luke Duncan; all these players are crapshoots at the position.
As a staff the question has to arise; Do any of these possible late additions/flips get us closer to a championship than Buchner and Angeli? (and Pyne with 3 more possible years - but respectfully not driving a decision). If it's probably not and we're relying on Rees/staff evaluations of their current guys here, why take one?
However, if they take none, better sure as shit get into that transfer portal to grab one and a good one.
If Pyne keeps this up, he's 100% the starting QB. No ifs ands or buts. He's playing at a borderline elite level right now.I can’t believe I’m saying this, but are we sure we’d get a better QB in the grad transfer market then Pyne? If he even is just solid against Clemson/USC, I think Pyne is the bridge QB to CJ.
How committed is a kid if he won't go public with his decision?How much is Rees to blame for Dante though? He got the commitment, just too bad Dad took the Nike bag
How much is Rees to blame for Dante though? He got the commitment, just too bad Dad took the Nike bag
Rees didn't reach out to other quarterbacks as Moore was taking other visits.
People don't want to hear that because it doesn't fit their narrative. He's playing great. We'll see if he can maintain that.If Pyne keeps this up, he's 100% the starting QB. No ifs ands or buts. He's playing at a borderline elite level right now.
I do! He does deserve credit for the good recruiting. And I’m happy to give him that. Feel free to look back at my history - I’ve given him credit for successful recruiting efforts and play calls when he deserved it.Arrow’s post above is 100% correct rational evaluation IMO. Do you agree?
I don’t! I think Notre Dame can do much better at OC than Tommy Rees, and I hope they do.We get it, you don’t lime Tommy. Jfc
Do you think Drew’s the guy to get them over the top? Because his ceiling is Ian Book - and that's a pretty good QB!How's Pyne played since he's taken over at QB?
He did. His name is CJ Carr. Secure Carr was the first step taken after losing Moore. What comes of Carr in 2023 or someone else in 2023 or 2024 is the question. But there was a post Moore plan, it was CJ Carr.
That was just as much, probably more, Brian Kelly's and Del Alexander's fault.I do! He does deserve credit for the good recruiting. And I’m happy to give him that.
His problem is when he misses, he misses in potentially disastrous ways, not “eh, win some, lose some”. Notre Dame is going to feel how badly he missed at WR for at least another season, if not two more.
I don’t! I think Notre Dame can do much better than Tommy Rees, and I hope they do.
I do! He does deserve credit for the good recruiting. And I’m happy to give him that.
His problem is when he misses, he misses in potentially disastrous ways, not “eh, win some, lose some”. Notre Dame is going to feel how badly he missed at WR for at least another season, if not two more.
I don’t! I think Notre Dame can do much better at OC than Tommy Rees, and I hope they do.
I like the way Pyne is playing, but we should still try and bring in the best grad transfer QB possible. That doesn't mean the transfer will be the starting QB next year. Maybe Pyne continues to improve.If Pyne keeps this up, he's 100% the starting QB. No ifs ands or buts. He's playing at a borderline elite level right now.
You did not like Drew lmao you were saying he was going to start because you were trying to say that Tommy Rees only started QBs like him.I do! He does deserve credit for the good recruiting. And I’m happy to give him that. Feel free to look back at my history - I’ve given him credit for successful recruiting efforts and play calls when he deserved it.
His problem is when he misses, he misses in potentially disastrous ways, not “eh, win some, lose some”. Notre Dame is going to feel how badly he missed at WR for at least another season, if not two more. And you can’t leave this class without a QB because you *have* to protect the team at the most important position on the field by giving yourself as many swings at the plate as possible.
I don’t! I think Notre Dame can do much better at OC than Tommy Rees, and I hope they do.
Do you think Drew’s the guy to get them over the top? Because his ceiling is Ian Book - and that's a pretty good QB!
And I *like* Drew - go back and check my history because I thought he was going to start at Ohio State over Buchner. But we should probably ask why the staff saw both and went with Buchner.
If Pyne keeps this up we don't need a grad transfer. He's completing 73% of his passes, averaging 7.9 YPA, and has a 4.5:1 TD:INT ratio (8:1 as a starter). That's borderline elite production.I like the way Pyne is playing, but we should still try and bring in the best grad transfer QB possible. That doesn't mean the transfer will be the starting QB next year. Maybe Pyne continues to improve.
Hand Rees the getting qbs to campus awardI will say, the group of QB's that Rees offered and/or got on campus for the 2023 class is impressive.
Nico Iamaleava 5*
Dante Moore 5*
Jackson Arnold 5*
Chris Vizzina 5*
Avery Johnson 4*
Austin Novosad 4*
All of these guys made it to campus in some fashion. I don't recall anything like this is recent history.
We can talk about closing, we can talk about the decision making on how they played Moore/Vizzina. Or if a reclassfication from Carr changes our view.
I still think this is the best "starting" group that any OC has got on campus.
We all want QB position to be "fixed" immediately, but it has to start somewhere and thats getting interest and getting them on campus. We made some strides, IMO.
Pyne is playing tremendously. But maybe let's see how we fare against an actually good defense before naming him the starter next year.If Pyne keeps this up we don't need a grad transfer. He's completing 73% of his passes, averaging 7.9 YPA, and has a 4.5:1 TD:INT ratio (8:1 as a starter). That's borderline elite production.
He does! I wasn’t trying to say anything! That’s his comfort zone as a coach through however many years he’s been here!You did not like Drew lmao you were saying he was going to start because you were trying to say that Tommy Rees only started QBs like him.
To add to the conversation on Pyne, his ADOT (average depth of target) is 6.2, which is 2nd to last in the power 5 (only DTR of UCLA is lower at 5.6) and 140th out of 144 qualified QBs.
Curious to know what that stat looks like after the last two games. It was something like 2.6 vs Cal.
ADOT of 8.9 vs UNC, ADOT of 6.0 vs BYUCurious to know what that stat looks like after the last two games. It was something like 2.6 vs Cal.
No, but you need multiple high ceiling guys competing for the job year in and year out if ND wants to take the next step and have a real shot at winning playoff games. Right now we’re scary close to seeing RP3 taking the helm.I can’t believe I’m saying this, but are we sure we’d get a better QB in the grad transfer market then Pyne? If he even is just solid against Clemson/USC, I think Pyne is the bridge QB to CJ.
Please don’t speak that into existence.No, but you need multiple high ceiling guys competing for the job year in and year out if ND wants to take the next step and have a real shot at winning playoff games. Right now we’re scary close to seeing RP3 taking the helm.
The good news is there is still time for him to win 4 Heisman's, right?Right now we’re scary close to seeing RP3 taking the helm.
Adot is not a barometer for success. You know who led the NFL in adot? Jemarcus Russell. Drew Brees was always near the bottom.
Colt McCoy's I'd guess was pretty low in college and think he's one of the best Qbs to ever do it at that level.
It's not a barometer but there is something that we can glean from this information. Pyne's company at the bottom of the ADOT board is UConn's QB, FIU's QB, Marshall's QB (lowest in FBS), DTR (very good college QB), and Will Rogers (good air raid QB). IMO it means that he has to maintain ~70% completion percentage to be an effective passer, or be a DTR who's also an extremely deadly run threat. Thus far, Pyne has been accurate and effective. Will that continue? Will teams be able to squeeze the life out of our pass game? How will he respond to the run game being taken away? All TBD.Adot is not a barometer for success. You know who led the NFL in adot? Jemarcus Russell. Drew Brees was always near the bottom.
Colt McCoy's I'd guess was pretty low in college and think he's one of the best Qbs to ever do it at that level.