How to fix College Football?

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,073
I think the transfer portal should be directly related to (1) coaching changes and (2) graduation.

If your coach leaves for another job or gets fired, you should get a free one-time transfer. This benefits the players, but also probably keeps schools from firing guys after a one or two year trial (especially schools that have no business paying millions for a buyout, then millions more for a new coach, when they aren't going to win any major trophies regardless). If you fire a guy, not only are you hoping the next guy offers a quality rebuild, but you're hoping he can fast track it by a year, because your roster is about to get pillaged by other schools. So some middling schools will ACTUALLY have to think about additional risks before making a move, which offers some stability for the players, but also gives a grace period to some potential up-and-coming coaches that might just need a year or two of extra seasoning to figure out the job.

Or, as previously/currently, you can move along without sitting out if you've graduated.

If you're just unhappy with your choice of college, or something comes up in your life that makes a transfer necessary, you can apply for a waiver... but the waiver should go through a committee NOT appointed by the NCAA, as their arbitrary, randomly-applied rulings were like 97% of the problem with the original transfer process anyway. The committee should be formed as a sort of "call up" committee to the playoff committee, that way it's made up of people with a legit interest in the sport, and they'll be motivated to pay their dues if they want to be involved with the playoff at any point.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
This is absolutely crazy and will never happen for a thousand different reasons... but it would the absolute best system, barred none. You would likely need to establish 4 regions with 26 teams per region where you play a round robin 12 game schedule against your division of your region. Top schools or top division advance to a 4-team playoff, bottom three schools get relegated. Top three schools of second division get promoted.

26 teams and 5 regions = 130 total teams (will have to add 5 schools from Division II). Division II is the same (it already has 129 schools). Division III currently has 250 schools so that can be organized into two smaller divisions. You could further subdivide the 5 regions into two 13 team groups. These 13 teams play each other. The best W-L record plays the other for the region Champ. Region champs play each other with a +1 next best record. 6 team playoff. Winner winner chicken dinner.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
I've not been that impressed with his leadership, but he's smart enough to see the shit storm coming and getting out so he won't have to deal with it. Might also be because he doesn't want that stain on his bio.

 

Redbar

Well-known member
Messages
3,531
Reaction score
806
Guy went from L$U to $EC to NCAA, so just not surprised at all. He did what he was supposed to do probably, now he’s trying to avoid having to take responsibility for all his (IN)actions.
 

phork

Raining On Your Parade
Messages
9,863
Reaction score
1,019
The future is super conferences. Period. 6 or 8 conferences 16 teams in each. Play 12 games total with 8 in your conference and randomize the other 4. Perfect seasons would go by the wayside but if we are trying to determine the best team then it should be against the best competition.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,693
Reaction score
5,992
The future is super conferences. Period. 6 or 8 conferences 16 teams in each. Play 12 games total with 8 in your conference and randomize the other 4. Perfect seasons would go by the wayside but if we are trying to determine the best team then it should be against the best competition.
It wrecks college football. But it looks like that is where we are heading
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
SEC & PAC12 commissioners are going to meet with some legislature's in DC to discuss getting a leash on this NIL wildfire.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,944
Reaction score
11,224
In the last 30 years CFB has become the 'fix it til it's broken' champion of the freaking world... I doubt that changes any time soon no matter what they do next.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
2,963
Maybe if we can convince the republicans that CFB is code word for a woman's body... surely they would regulate it.
Yeah, or maybe if we tell the Dems that it is a white man is running CFB and therefore evil they will regulate it. Or maybe, just say that people are being misgendered and watch the epic meltdown of the left. As a man (who can get pregnant according to the left) I am glad Roe is getting taken down.
 
Last edited:

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
That escalated quickly.

All I'd add is that it seems odd that the SEC is pushing NIL regulation when it's SEC schools that are being most aggressive with it and stand the most to gain, given how it just means more, and all.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
That escalated quickly.

All I'd add is that it seems odd that the SEC is pushing NIL regulation when it's SEC schools that are being most aggressive with it and stand the most to gain, given how it just means more, and all.
That was my initial thought, but the SEC is already at the top so there isn't a lot to gain from everything being the wild west. If Sankey really wants to form some type of super conference or split from the NCAA, what better way to get future support from the lessors than to go to bat for them now? Make a deposit in the emotional bank account for a future withdrawal.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,509
Reaction score
9,283
SEC & PAC12 commissioners are going to meet with some legislature's in DC to discuss getting a leash on this NIL wildfire.


The politicians can’t fix the problems this country already has. So you know they can’t help here.
 

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
Maybe if we can convince the republicans that CFB is code word for a woman's body... surely they would regulate it.
You mean kind of like mandating people put a pretty much experimental drug with no long term testing into their bodies for 2 years. Most Dems dont realize how much they could actually probably accomplish if they weren’t such f*cking transparent hypocrites…like thinking they get to “regulate” when “my body my choice” is applicable and not.

How or why you brought this stupid shit into a conversation about the future direction of college football…
 
Last edited:

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,154
That escalated quickly.

All I'd add is that it seems odd that the SEC is pushing NIL regulation when it's SEC schools that are being most aggressive with it and stand the most to gain, given how it just means more, and all.

That was my initial thought, but the SEC is already at the top so there isn't a lot to gain from everything being the wild west. If Sankey really wants to form some type of super conference or split from the NCAA, what better way to get future support from the lessors than to go to bat for them now? Make a deposit in the emotional bank account for a future withdrawal.
I don't know if Sankey is trying to curry favor with the other programs or not (that may well be the explanation), but I know that most SEC fans I know, even if NIL and virtually unrestricted transfers are helping their team, DO NOT like what it's doing to CFB. Bama's definitely benefited from the transfer portal, the easy transfers, and we can go toe to toe with anyone on NIL money, yet Saban has been about the most consistent and vocal critic of it all, telling anyone and everyone that it's bad for CFB. I'm a huge Bama fan and am well aware that it benefits my team, yet I'm 110% opposed to what's happening. I think most fans feel that way too.
 

IrishBoognish

Well-known member
Messages
2,344
Reaction score
3,619
I havent read the whole thread so I apologize if this has been said already, but unrestricted free agency and unrestricted salary caps can't exist together in any sport. Its an impossible combination.

Regardless how we feel about amateurism, that's just not how sports work.

The only way this can get fixed is if the transfer portal ends... like now. And there needs to be serious implications for tampering... one school getting in a kids ear about leaving... just like pro sports.

1 year wait. I would be cool if the head coach leaves, you can transfer with no restrictions, but thats it.

Its dumb otherwise.


Restrict NIL to NIL You can't get paid until you've been at a school for at least a year.


Those two fixes, and I think we're on to something.
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
I havent read the whole thread so I apologize if this has been said already, but unrestricted free agency and unrestricted salary caps can't exist together in any sport. Its an impossible combination.

Regardless how we feel about amateurism, that's just not how sports work.

The only way this can get fixed is if the transfer portal ends... like now. And there needs to be serious implications for tampering... one school getting in a kids ear about leaving... just like pro sports.

1 year wait. I would be cool if the head coach leaves, you can transfer with no restrictions, but thats it.

Its dumb otherwise.


Restrict NIL to NIL You can't get paid until you've been at a school for at least a year.


Those two fixes, and I think we're on to something.
Don't think that would stand up in a court of law.
 

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
7,330
Reaction score
5,655
The way to fix college football is simple.
1. Go back to everyone having to sit out a year if they decide to transfer. The exception would be grad transfers. This would solve a majority of the NIL problem. Whose to say if Styles comes out this year and has 1000-1200 yards receiving that a school like USC doesn't offer him 1 MIL to come play there in two years?
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
I don't know if Sankey is trying to curry favor with the other programs or not (that may well be the explanation), but I know that most SEC fans I know, even if NIL and virtually unrestricted transfers are helping their team, DO NOT like what it's doing to CFB. Bama's definitely benefited from the transfer portal, the easy transfers, and we can go toe to toe with anyone on NIL money, yet Saban has been about the most consistent and vocal critic of it all, telling anyone and everyone that it's bad for CFB. I'm a huge Bama fan and am well aware that it benefits my team, yet I'm 110% opposed to what's happening. I think most fans feel that way too.
It's not so much Bama that benefits from NIL - in my opinion - as the programs that have been failing to keep up with Bama (A&M, Tennessee, probably Auburn and the Mississippi schools). The dirtiest programs in the sport have always been the wannabes and almosttheres and this is just the latest iteration of that.
 

Pokitren

Banned
Messages
3
Reaction score
4
I think the transfer portal should be directly related to (1) coaching changes and (2) graduation.

If your coach leaves for another job or gets fired, you should get a free one-time transfer. This benefits the players, but also probably keeps schools from firing guys after a one or two year trial (especially schools that have no business paying millions for a buyout, then millions more for a new coach, when they aren't going to win any major trophies regardless). If you fire a guy, not only are you hoping the next guy offers a quality rebuild, but you're hoping he can fast track it by a year, because your roster is about to get pillaged by other schools. So some middling schools will ACTUALLY have to think about additional risks before making a move, which offers some stability for the players, but also gives a grace period to some potential up-and-coming coaches that might just need a year or two of extra seasoning to figure out the job.

Or, as previously/currently, you can move along without sitting out if you've graduated.

If you're just unhappy with your choice of college, or something comes up in your life that makes a transfer necessary, you can apply for a waiver... but the waiver should go through a committee NOT appointed by the NCAA, as their arbitrary, randomly-applied rulings were like 97% of the problem with the original transfer process anyway. The committee should be formed as a sort of "call up" committee to the playoff committee, that way it's made up of people with a legit interest in the sport, and they'll be motivated to pay their dues if they want to be involved with the playoff at any point.
Watching sports teams for years now, I have come to the conclusion that they just play their game, rarely do they strive to reach any peaks. They're just having a good time :) So when spending millions on a new team member, especially a coach, one has to ask the question: what do you want to achieve in this team and how realistic is your goal?
 

Rogue219

Well-known member
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
1,080
Let recruits sign whenever they are ready. No Signing Day, early Signing Day. If you want to commit to a school, you should be able to do it at any point if you've decided you are ready.

No more "non commitable" offers and at that point there is no reason for other schools to continue pursuing if a recruit wants to be left alone.

This commitable offer stuff is garbage. If you can't commit verbally and or sign at that moment, you don't have an offer in my book. This would be my advice to recruits as both a coach and or parent.
 
Top