Ndaccountant
Old Hoss
- Messages
- 8,370
- Reaction score
- 5,771
That's a big if. If Trump had avoided offending just about every group except angry, white males he would be a serious candidate, but he wouldn't be the Republican primary favorite. His rhetoric blames females, blacks, Hispanics, the LGBT community, and many others for the economic condition of the angry white male. That has been the Republican line for quite awhile. Trump just said it louder and without expressing any regrets about who he offended in the process, including members of his own political party.
We just have a different interpretation of what is going on. I see Trump capitalizing on a populist movement that threatens the political establishment. He articulated that populism thru poorly chosen words (at least from a political standpoint). This isn't solely a white male down on luck movement. It's true there are more white males than any other demographic, but dismissing the populism as "angry white males" is not completely accurate. Consider the following:
5 myths about Trump supporters - POLITICO
And a study by the RAND Corporation found that GOP voters who agree with the statement that “people like me don’t have any say about what the government does” were 86 percent more likely to support Trump than any other candidate.
Read more: 5 myths about Trump supporters - POLITICO
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
That is populism at it's core.
Last edited: