NDBoiler
The Rep Machine
- Messages
- 4,455
- Reaction score
- 1,826
How's your AssMar?
Sucks to your Assmar
How's your AssMar?
I was referring to the staff. Misunderstanding, had nothing to do with you personally
From what I know of the recruitments of Barnett, Hilliard, Barajas, and Coney I'd definitely characterize our style as passive vs. pressure.
After Barnett committed, we weren't aggressively fending off other schools and marking our territory. We didn't do a good job of continuing to recruit/sell him and I don't really think our big wigs did a great job of developing a relationship over the 6+ months he was committed. And once things got rocky, we didn't fight and claw to keep him.
Hilliard we didn't turn up the heat on until late. We were always actively recruiting him, but Meyer put on the full court press well before we did and did a better job of actively building relationships with those around Justin before we did. And Meyer neg recruited like a champ... the story of some of the stuff he pitched to Harris/Cornell/Hilliard about Michigan is hilarious. And you better believe he didn't treat ND with kid gloves.
Barajas we treated passively and PSU stole him with aggressive recruiting despite him being an "ND lock"... after that we barely followed up with contact. Were it not for Barajas' heart truly being at ND we don't get him back.
With Coney, we could've tried hard to get him to commit and probably could've secured a pledge. But we chose to instead make sure he took his time and came to the best decision for him. Smart? Probably. I like this approach, personally. But now we're in a dog fight.
All of these are examples of passive recruiting where we let the kid comfortably make the best decision for them. Good news? The kids that sign up are generally going to have a better attrition rate. Bad news? You'll miss on some kids. But it's a big departure from how we approached Tee, Darby, Lynch, etc. in the beginning of Kelly's tenure.
I have a theory that I don't believe to be true. Meaning, I think it makes sense, but I don't think it's likely to be the case...
I have a theory that I don't believe to be true. Meaning, I think it makes sense, but I don't think it's likely to be the case.
BK is getting content with lower rated guys who are more likely to stick to ND because it's ND when he leaves after this year or next. He doesn't want to screw over the next coach by having 4/5 star guys committed who will likely decommit if he leaves. He's going after some big dogs, but not going to fill the class with guys who have offers all over the country. Guys who they think are underrated as 3-stars and don't have a lot of offers, are going to to stick to ND more than the guy with offers all over. I'm on my phone and typed this in like 8 seconds so I apologize if it sounds like it was written by a 3rd grader.
With all of the changes him and Jack have made, I think he stays for a few years, but this idea has crossed my mind.
I don't know what changed from a few weeks back when I (along with other posters who are now complaining) said Michigan was a legitimate threat. There was always a strong possibility he ended up there. It was not as much an "ours to lose" battle as some thought.
FWIW, Anna still believes ND leads from very recently discussions. Also she was told the Michigan stuff was not true, she was told this by Bilal himself.
Ok, let's pretend for the moment that this is correct, even though on the surface it's asinine. So, BK is planning to leave but he doesn't want the transition to hurt the next coach by having high profile guys leave. Thus, he is recruiting guys that will stick around even if they are perceived to be slightly lesser talents . Well, wouldn't he be hurting the next coach by stuffing a roster full of said lesser players?
I don't know what changed from a few weeks back when I (along with other posters who are now complaining) said Michigan was a legitimate threat. There was always a strong possibility he ended up there. It was not as much an "ours to lose" battle as some thought.
That's certainly true and we cannot forget that.
But, IMO, this if much bigger than Bilal. We have gotten beaten to the punch in recruiting over the past two years in a repeatable fashion, especially for the more promising talent. We have secured some bigger names, but the success rate seems to be declining. It's recruiting and you will win some and lose some. But, the current trend of losing, especially for the defensive players, isn't very comforting when we are trying to build a championship caliber team. (And yes, I am aware that BVG's system could attract talent, but that is to be seen)
The people citing he's set on Michigan are supposedly getting it from sources around Bilal, like his high school HC. No doubt that he's not going to say it publicly to someone who asks him straight up, because that'd put him in an awkward spot. Also, if he was truly 100% set on Michigan he'd have committed already, so just be hopeful he takes it out to OVs.
Did you see what happened to our 2012 recruiting class? Half the big name players that committed ended up decommitting, and then we lost a lot of players as transfers. It was a disaster.
I have no problem saying we are trying to avoid attitudes that may be similar to a Lynch. But let's not kid ourselves here and believe that shifting a roster more towards "RKG's" will produce more opportunities to challenge for a playoff spot.
"I don't know where that came from. It came out of thin air. Even (Michigan assistant) Coach Mallory asked me if I was going to commit yesterday. I'm not. Michigan is not my leader."
Snap! Take that Michigan.
![]()
God, how did this happen? About a week or two we went from having Coney and Bilal close to locks, and now both of them are trending towards the other schools. I can't even explain the reasoning. Coney? Yeah, UF is close to home and you can't beat the weather (though it's Gainesville, smack dab in the middle of the state, nowhere near either coast), but outside of that, nothing. Muschamp is on the hottest of seats and Florida is coming off a dismal season, and this year isn't look all that much better. Bilal? I've got nothing. Hoke has been a tad bit more successful than Muschamp at Michigan, but that's not saying much. Outside of his fluke '11 season (easiest schedule and BS BCS matchup), he's done nothing to convince anybody that he's a competent coach.
I find it ironic that everybody says "winning cures", yet we're losing battles to two teams that had WORSE records than us last year.
God, how did this happen? About a week or two we went from having Coney and Bilal close to locks, and now both of them are trending towards the other schools. I can't even explain the reasoning. Coney? Yeah, UF is close to home and you can't beat the weather (though it's Gainesville, smack dab in the middle of the state, nowhere near either coast), but outside of that, nothing. Muschamp is on the hottest of seats and Florida is coming off a dismal season, and this year isn't look all that much better. Bilal? I've got nothing. Hoke has been a tad bit more successful than Muschamp at Michigan, but that's not saying much. Outside of his fluke '11 season (easiest schedule and BS BCS matchup), he's done nothing to convince anybody that he's a competent coach.
I find it ironic that everybody says "winning cures", yet we're losing battles to two teams that had WORSE records than us last year.