pkt77242
IPA Man
- Messages
- 10,805
- Reaction score
- 719
I agree that's a major problem with the NC law. If we're going to hold this increasingly polarized republic together, we're going to have to respect the rights of distinct electorates to self-determination.
That's a strong indicator that: (1) sexual orientation and gender "identification" are not analogous to race; and (2) the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is ill-suited to handling these issues.
As I mentioned above, I'm not defending these laws as the most prudent way of addressing the issue of civil rights for the gender dysphoric, but by ascribing evil motives to your political opponents, you're part of the problem as well.
That's laughable. Virtually every such recent conflict has originated from a top-down Federal mandate seeking to normalize some Progressive idea, against which social and religious conservatives have to scramble for accommodation. Your side is clearly the aggressor.
I rather disagree. When people are being fired for being LGBT that is the start of the aggression. When states pass amendment to ban gay people from getting married that is being the aggressor. Fighting for things that you are being denied (or that is actively being taken away from you) isn't being the aggressor.