dublinirish
Everestt Gholstonson
- Messages
- 27,308
- Reaction score
- 13,086
funny how excited the coach's are on the videos and the players are just like "ohh hey coach...yeah..im excited..ok talk to you later"
funny how excited the coach's are on the videos and the players are just like "ohh hey coach...yeah..im excited..ok talk to you later"
Ok... I'll do it.
![]()
OK I'll do it....BOOM!
Love it.Scout: FWIW, “After my official visit to Michigan in December, I came back home and knew I wanted to go to Notre Dame,” Jones said. “I called coach Kelly and silently committed then.”
And, “I wanted my school to be the first to find out,” Jones said. “That’s why waited until signing day. I didn’t want to announce it on Twitter or something because Twitter ain’t done nothing for me. It’s the people and the coaches at my school that have helped me accomplish everything."
Scout: FWIW, “After my official visit to Michigan in December, I came back home and knew I wanted to go to Notre Dame,” Jones said. “I called coach Kelly and silently committed then.”
And, “I wanted my school to be the first to find out,” Jones said. “That’s why waited until signing day. I didn’t want to announce it on Twitter or something because Twitter ain’t done nothing for me. It’s the people and the coaches at my school that have helped me accomplish everything."
His film is interesting, because he shows good mobility and an aggressive first step in the right direction (but it's highlights sooo....) which are what you want in a MIKE. If there's anything to be disappointed about it's his physicality on film. He doesn't exactly "thump" people. How is he going to do at taking on blocks? How much bigger and stronger is he going to get? Those will only be answered in time, but he doesn't exactly have a huge frame.
His film is interesting, because he shows good mobility and an aggressive first step in the right direction (but it's highlights sooo....) which are what you want in a MIKE. If there's anything to be disappointed about it's his physicality on film. He doesn't exactly "thump" people. How is he going to do at taking on blocks? How much bigger and stronger is he going to get? Those will only be answered in time, but he doesn't exactly have a huge frame.
This is my only real concern. Shedding blocks is about engaging and disengaging which is all done through extension of the arms, basically. He's a long torso, short armed LB. I like what I see from him in all other areas but that should be a concern.
He's got nice feet, good box power, plays with a good base, and moves laterally well. Like you said they are highlights but he seems to have a good understanding of space in pass coverage, which will be important at MLB.
If it's straight on, a lot of that is in the pad level with the arm extension. Shorter arms typically equate to more power than someone with long arms which can be a plus. Short arms are more of a negative when when trying to disengage going laterally. Anyone know his reach?
I might be misunderstanding what your saying but I disagree. The longer a lever is, the greater force it exerts through the same effort. Jonathan's arms would be considered levers.
I might be misunderstanding what your saying but I disagree. The longer a lever is, the greater force it exerts through the same effort. Jonathan's arms would be considered levers.
Maybe my physics is a bit rusty, but I think the answer is that the longer lever has more potential force, but that must be supported by the musculature, etc. Where as typical human physiology more frequently supports a shorter arm length with more muscle density.
But, what do I know. I didn't get a degree in kinesiology from Fishigan like half their roster.
I might be misunderstanding what your saying but I disagree. The longer a lever is, the greater force it exerts through the same effort. Jonathan's arms would be considered levers.