Bubbles
Turn down your lights
- Messages
- 661
- Reaction score
- 76
He caved over the articles and admitted he probably needs to do more research on Notre Dame...
this is me spiking the football... reps to all that dropped articles.
He caved over the articles and admitted he probably needs to do more research on Notre Dame...
this is me spiking the football... reps to all that dropped articles.
We got an extra .1 for AP classes, so the best you could do was around 4.1 or so if memory serves......5 seems a bit out of control.
There was a really good discussion the other day about how Notre Dame will consider students who fall below the GPA or SAT 'requirements' of purely academic students for a number of reasons.
Musicians, artists, athletes, differing backgrounds, etc., all add to a more diverse and interesting school.
Grey always brings da love
Reps... This is a good start... if anything can find something that addresses admissions also I'd realy be greatful.

I'll try one more time since I just typed this up in a PM and it feels a shame to waste it:
Notre Dame isn't that much different than other schools when it comes to admissions, but they really set themselves apart once the players are actually enrolled as students. They might pick easy majors and easy classes but at least they're "real" majors, "real" classes, and "real" grades from the professors.
I know I had a friend who was a varsity fencer at ND and his ACT was a 23, so to me that's as much proof as anything that athletes are admitted under a different standard, and not just a point or two here and there.
I think another key difference between Notre Dame and other schools is that admissions doesn't have a fixed "minimum" academic profile for ordinary students. Some places throw your application in the trash if you have less than, say, a 16 ACT. ND can say they don't give "waivers" to minimum test scores because they don't have an official minimum test score in the first place. The profile of the average admitted student floats with the quality and quantity of the applicant pool. ND is going to let in roughly 4,000 kids every year. If only 6,000 kids apply and they all have 18 ACTs, then that's what it takes to get in. If 18,000 kids apply with ACTs in the 30s, then the standard moves. The standard to be admitted as a regular student is "are you one of the 4,000 best applicants we've seen?" The standard to be admitted as a recruited varsity athlete is "will you be able to succeed academically at Notre Dame?"
Executive summary: "Regular" Notre Dame students are not evaluated against a standard academic profile. They're evaluated against one another. Recruited varsity athletes (and kids of big donors, etc.) are admitted if they have what it takes to be successful students at Notre Dame.
I have no idea what you mean by this. Yes, Intro to Jazz exists. And so does McKenna's amazing (and athlete heavy) Ethology class. And so on and so forth. At every school there are some "easy" free electives. Every single one of those classes is open to all students. That athletes, like many students, elect to take them because they are easy or awesome or GPA boosters in free elective slots is not anything to write home about. They still have to take all the core courses for their major like any other student. And every major they take is a real major available to all students. To graduate with an engineering degree I had to take the same calculus, physics, mechanics, etc. as every other student. To graduate as a biology major, they have to take the same core courses as every other major. To graduate as a FTT major... yeah you get the idea.
Please let me know if you meant something else by "football class"... as in classes only football players can take.
There is no doubt that they get TONS of help from tutoring. This is mainly to offset the fact that they have 20-50 hours a week typically dedicated to a sport whereas a regular student has those same 20-50 to study or do what they want. Football players have mandatory study hall where they are forced to do as much work as possible in a concentrated period of time. They have individual tutoring because instead of having those 20-50 hours to go to office hours or TA sessions or do work in a group of their classmates... they're stuck trying to do it all in condensed odd hours of time.
Do they play by "a different set of rules" in the sense that no other students have access to these tutors? Yes. Do they still have to do all of the same work in all of the same classes as any other student? Yes. Never with my own eyes have I ever seen a tutor write a paper for a player, do an assignment for a player, or directly give answers to a player. I think you have a gross misunderstanding of what goes on.
So, does it ever work in the other direction? Does a school like ND ever take a student/athlete that is far superior to their teammates in the classroom, but may just be a marginal player, so they can keep the overall team GPA up? Is there enough pressure from the academia that this happens?
I don't really have a point in all this, just curious ......
I worked as a football tutor in 2010 and 2011 and I have absolutely seen this happen. Not a common occurrence, but it does happen.
That's another key distinction. There are "regular" students who absolutely worship the football guys and will help them cheat. It's not institutional fraud, but rouge individuals.
Never trust a tutor wearing too much make-up.
Tom Hammond?