Who cares who's on the panel.. WIN
The even bigger point... Tyrone being on that board is bad for Notre Dame. He was fired and then never disputed any of the "ND is rascist" talk that went on after.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Tyrone Willingham & former USA Today reporter Steve Wieberg on CFB Playoff Committee sources told <a href="https://twitter.com/espn">@ESPN</a>. Willingham 1st ex-coach on it</p>— Brett McMurphy (@McMurphyESPN) <a href="https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/statuses/386465807049310208">October 5, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Why are Condoleeza Rice and Archie Manning on the selection panel? Why not have journalists, ADs, and Conference commissioners?
Why are Condoleeza Rice and Archie Manning on the selection panel? Why not have journalists, ADs, and Conference commissioners?
Why have ADs and Conference Commissioners? Their bonuses and conference revenue sharing deals make this as corrupt as the Coaches Poll.
That's a good point - but I'd prefer to have people with football knowledge. After all, it's not like Condoleeza will know very much about the teams other than scores and what the journalists write about them.
Does anyone know how the teams will be ranked during the season? Will we still have BCS rankings till the end of the season?
Thanks. Glory be to the death of the BCS era.AP and Coaches Poll will still exist, but won't count for anything which is status quo for the AP poll. The BCS poll will cease to exist. The BCS is dead. Let us rejoice.
I remember reading that the selection committee will come out with some sort of ranking half way through the season. I don't know if it will be 25 teams, weekly, etc, but they will give the public some indication of where the top teams stand with them during the season.
AP and Coaches Poll will still exist, but won't count for anything which is status quo for the AP poll. The BCS poll will cease to exist. The BCS is dead. Let us rejoice.
I remember reading that the selection committee will come out with some sort of ranking half way through the season. I don't know if it will be 25 teams, weekly, etc, but they will give the public some indication of where the top teams stand with them during the season.
The BCS wasn't perfect, but I can't see the Old Men holding the money bags making any better choices.
You have to admit selecting 4 versus 64 is a bit different, including the vast amounts of money at stake.Do you have issues with the NCAA BBall Selection Committee? It's the same formula and I rarely hear people complain about that selection process.
You have to admit selecting 4 versus 64 is a bit different, including the vast amounts of money at stake.
This is one of my concerns. These guys are essentially picking the Final Four in the end.
It's not perfect but it will expand to 8 sooner rather than later. The difference between 8-9th best teams getting left out versus the 4-5th is big. Either way it has much better potential than the BCS ever did.
I don't. The real winners in this will be sponsorship money, cities hosting events, etc. There will be people making money off of this and it won't be the schools or conferences.It's definitely different and not an apples to apples comparison, but I'd trust well-educated people over computers any day. Call me naïve, but I just don't think the people serving on the committee will make these decisions with anything but on-field performance in mind. The way the revenue distribution is set up, schools will not receive a huge payout for making the playoffs. Most of the money is already distributed before they select the teams, and, just like the basketball committee, members will sit out on discussions regarding their school.
I think people are under the impression that a truck load of money will go to the schools that are picked and that's not the case.
Do you have issues with the NCAA BBall Selection Committee? It's the same formula and I rarely hear people complain about that selection process.
It's definitely different and not an apples to apples comparison, but I'd trust well-educated people over computers any day. Call me naïve, but I just don't think the people serving on the committee will make these decisions with anything but on-field performance in mind. The way the revenue distribution is set up, schools will not receive a huge payout for making the playoffs. Most of the money is already distributed before they select the teams, and, just like the basketball committee, members will sit out on discussions regarding their school.
I think people are under the impression that a truck load of money will go to the schools that are picked and that's not the case.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Spurrier on Condi Rice being on the playoff committee: "Why not? She's a Stanford graduate, plays a little golf."</p>— G&B Attack (@GABAttack) <a href="https://twitter.com/GABAttack/statuses/387612192855453696">October 8, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>