So where is the outrage for the guys on our team that had offers to play at Ivy League schools like Harvard? The self interest of the player/parents of their kid being on tv with a major football program was bigger than the world class education that the Ivy League offers.
You shouldn't have a problem with a kid picking any school if its the one they like the most. It's not you or your kid going.
Obviously, Harvard is not a football school and only the occasional kid makes it to the NFL. If you think the NFL is in your future, you get much better training at a BCS school. The idea is to got to a school where you actually get a great education WHILE you are maximizing your potential in football. I actually do think it is a questionable decision for some kids with no legit hope for the NFL to spurn Harvard.
Some people think it's always unreasonable for a family to push a kid to a school that is less prestigious both athletically and academically. Personally, I think its a balancing act and more complicated than that. It's great to go to have access to Alabama's coaches and competition, but if you never play, maybe it would have been smarter to go to Deleware (see Joe Flacco). Also, some kids might lose focus away from their support structure. Better to stay close to family than start drifting. If a kid isn't academically gifted, Stanford's elite academics might not benefit him, and might actually stifle his growth.
As far as being having a problem with other parents decisions, people are entitled to opinions. College football fans sometimes know more about the landscape than parents who are being sold a pile of crap by these salesmen. UF under Meyer, USC in the 2000s, and LSU right now, for example, are not positive environments. UNC under their previous coach was shady.
ND is not perfect, but lots of professional sprots writers not associated with the university agree that it does things differntly--in a positive way. Just because you are a fan and get a little carried away, doesn't cahnge that.