irishff1014
Well-known member
- Messages
- 26,509
- Reaction score
- 9,283
This kid is going to be a leader.
Can Kelly seriously not find a way to incorporate this kid into the offense?
Wouldn't a little dump off screen or something be manageable?
I feel like Davonte needs to be utilized somehow, right now.
Who knows maybe Kelly doesnt want to show all his cards, and saving a package for Davonte for a big game like next weekend. Really starting to love this kid though, coming in i was alittle worried he might be a me guy with all that happened during his recrutment, but he hasnt complained about not getting playing time and is ALWAYS the first player celebrating with his teammates.
We just need to get him in space and let him do his thing. This will come in time.
THIS is why I think he deserves to be on the field. The kid is doing all the things necessary to be on the filed imo. Maybe his route running isn't up to speed. Regardless, I think the kid would be able to handle a simple dump off pass...
I want to see Kelly release the Kraken!
THIS is why I think he deserves to be on the field. The kid is doing all the things necessary to be on the filed imo. Maybe his route running isn't up to speed. Regardless, I think the kid would be able to handle a simple dump off pass...
I want to see Kelly release the Kraken!
I know he's got potential but he hasn't shown much in the punt return game that leads me to believe that he should get the ball before Wood, Riddick, GAIII, Eifert, TJ, or even DaVaris.
I wish we would stop gunning to block punts and focus on setting up blocks for Neal.
You can tell he wants an opportunity to run so bad.
The sad thing is we aren't even trying to block punts.
There must have been 5 or 6 BYU players around Neal during one punt yesterday.
I think I remember seeing somewhere that the reson some of the young wr was bc of their lack of blocking
Goodman muffed a couple. Neal has been on it. A muffed punt would have lost us a game by now.
We're not trying to block punts at all to my view. I recommended in August that a paradoxical way to get good punts to run back IS to regularly try to block punts and get the punter worried about it. Almost all punters if they can sit in a rockingchair will sky the punt. Those aren't returnable unless they're huge boomers and our guy is WAY back there to field the "outkick the coverage". Most returnables are low-flying [no hang time] rushed semi-flubs that the returner takes on the fly with forward motion and their gunners not yet there.
I'd LOVE to see us begin rushing the punter. This is the one thing Coach is hyperconservative about. He knows we aren't consistent on offense and therefore need as many drives as we can get [i.e. not giving up any due to a punting violation penalty or a wildwest risky muff].
This is another example of why you can't schedule one meatgrinder team after another like Swarbrick did [probably the only thing that he does which is colossally stupid]. Our guys have no free air to "polish up" anything and to risk surprising things. We are battling our butts off and surviving week-to-week. If Swarbrick would just get-a-clue regarding anything close to reasonable scheduling, we'd probably fix lots of these minor "add-on" types of bells and whistles by now.
No need for him to block if the ball is in his hands...
I'm hoping that you just forgot the italics?
It's funny that everyone blamed Goodman for our poor punt returns last year. We now know it was so not his fault.
Here are a few examples of our stellar punt coverage. Discuss.
![]()
![]()
I was being facetious more than anything. But I was just saying that if he is just out there for a few plays, and he gets a bubble screen or quick slant on those plays from the Z, then he doesn't need to block. I know this isn't feasible because teams would pick up on it very quickly, but why not give it a shot.
Because no one else on the team is getting playing time unless they learn to be a complete player at their position. Coach K is probably not going to make an exception for Devontae Neal. Nor should he.