Notre Dame circa 2012 could actually be better than last year's edition, but still end up with a worse record.
There are two points here. The actual prediction. Nobody faults anyone for being conservative any more.
Then there is the writing. "Notre Dame
circa 2012 could actually be better than last year's edition, but still end up with a worse record."
Circa? For real? What do the 2012 edition of the Fighting Irish, and King Tut have in common?
cir·ca [sur-kuh] preposition, adverb
about: (used especially in)
approximate dates: The Venerable Bede was born circa 673. Abbreviation: ca, ca., c., c, cir., circ.
"Notre Dame
about 2012 could actually be better than last year's edition, but still end up with a worse record."
This shows the most overblown, egotistical line I have ever seen from South Bend. I got a friend that is an anthropologist, maybe I could have him come to the Gug and dig up some artifacts.
Now for the second part; the great revelation. With as tough as this schedule is, they could be a better team with a worse record. Never heard that before . . .
At least report something. This is the Chinese food of sports reporting. Read it and you know you still haven't come across a thought. Makes you want to read something of substance 15 minutes later.
I have a spare copy of Ulysses, if anyone wants to borrow it.