Isn't the bigger problem that an ad taken out by fans is all it takes to upset the apple cart?
Can I ruin UK basketball's recruiting by taking out an ad in the
Kentucky Kernel?
The entire issue at hand here is how people are conflating the valid and widely held opinion that Kelly has not been good enough and should be replaced with the ideas that ads 1) aren't a big deal or 2) accomplish something good or 3) are otherwise justifiable.
You could make an argument that taking out an ad in the paper could've served a purpose any time before the Friday release of Jack's statement. After that, points #2 and #3 no longer hold as it is a certifiable fact that no change was going to be made.
Saying "isn't a bigger problem that..." and saying "well, anyone could..." is just obfuscation of the fact that
an alum taking out an ad in the paper like that is stupid and has negative consequences. The bolded premise is what a few people continue to rail against, despite all logic and evidence to the contrary, and it's a losing position to anyone who thinks about it critically as a single action.
If you work in an office and all of the people rightfully grumble about the lack of functioning smoke detectors and fire extinguishers... and the people in the office raise these concerns about how the batteries in the smoke detector REALLY need to be changed and how the building should meet code... and the office manager says "tough shit, I full faith in our office's ability to deal with a fire" or whatever. So then you go throw a fork in the microwave to start a fire to "shed light on the problem and how dangerous it is" and cause thousands of dollars of fire damage...
...you cannot defend throwing a fork in the microwave with "well, isn't the bigger deal that a little fire caused so much damage
because there were no fire extinguishers nearby as required by code??? I mean, if I had done that at the building next door which is brand new and has everything working correctly, it wouldn't cause any harm. And, you know, one of our competitors easily could have come over here and thrown a fork in the microwave too... there's nothing stopping them..."
YES... it IS a problem that the building is not up to code and the office manager refuses to address the problem.
NO... that DOES NOT mean throwing a fork in the microwave to "send a message" and cause damage to the office is appropriate behavior or a smart decision.
This is all very simple, and this is not a difference of opinion. The opinion that believes the alum taking out the ad 1) isn't a big deal 2) has a positive effect and no negative effect 3) is a valid choice because (insert mitigating circumstance) is flat
wrong.