Trump Presidency

[bobbyok1]

Wouldn't logic lead us to believe that if the average IT guy finding this would mean a more skilled person could have surefire evidence ready to go by now? It seems like the ship is sailing on the public perception that there was manipulation in the software. World leaders are already calling Biden to congratulate him, if there were questions of the software used, wouldn't they hold off?

My view is this "It's Trump against the Machine of Political Elites from Both Parties".

So, I have no expectation that there is going to be anything but a grassroots uprising of exposing election fraud and from Trumps own campaign team. I do see the grassroots uprising in many sources that I have taken much time to look into.

Also from what people like Sidney Powell (lawyer on Trumps team) claims, they have the goods on manipulation of software. There is already a large amount of grass roots research into these highly likely manipulations.

And, from my understanding, people far smarter than the average IT guy ARE ready to go or nearly ready to go. It's one thing to put something on a blog, it's another thing to prepare your primary evidence for the Supreme Court.

From all I understand the Trump campaign is showing many smaller instances of election fraud while also making clear claims of widespread fraud. Why would you make that claim if you knew you had no chance of winning? I think you make that claim because you are confident you have the evidence and you are making sure your cross you I's and dot your T's as this is your one shot to overturn illegitimate vote counts.

As far as globalist are concerned, I mean world leaders, . . .

My view is there are plenty of world leaders who would be FAR more happy with a Biden Presidency than a Trump second term. Biden/Harris will play along just fine with the Globalist plan, that is clear. Things like the 2021 Great Economic Reset that will require everyone to play along, including the US, need Biden to win.

Trump has no plans to play the Global Economy game, Biden's all in. So world leaders calling to congratulate Biden doesn't say much to me anymore than the bulk of corporate US media congratulating him on being "President-Elect" when he is not.

 

[TorontoGold]

My view is this "It's Trump against the Machine of Political Elites from Both Parties".

So, I have no expectation that there is going to be anything but a grassroots uprising of exposing election fraud and from Trumps own campaign team. I do see the grassroots uprising in many sources that I have taken much time to look into.

Also from what people like Sidney Powell (lawyer on Trumps team) claims, they have the goods on manipulation of software. There is already a large amount of grass roots research into these highly likely manipulations.

And, from my understanding, people far smarter than the average IT guy ARE ready to go or nearly ready to go. It's one thing to put something on a blog, it's another thing to prepare your primary evidence for the Supreme Court.

From all I understand the Trump campaign is showing many smaller instances of election fraud while also making clear claims of widespread fraud. Why would you make that claim if you knew you had no chance of winning? I think you make that claim because you are confident you have the evidence and you are making sure your cross you I's and dot your T's as this is your one shot to overturn illegitimate vote counts.

As far as globalist are concerned, I mean world leaders, . . .

My view is there are plenty of world leaders who would be FAR more happy with a Biden Presidency than a Trump second term. Biden/Harris will play along just fine with the Globalist plan, that is clear. Things like the 2021 Great Economic Reset that will require everyone to play along, including the US, need Biden to win.

Trump has no plans to play the Global Economy game, Biden's all in. So world leaders calling to congratulate Biden doesn't say much to me anymore than the bulk of corporate US media congratulating him on being "President-Elect" when he is not.

When you say both parties, which prominent Republican's have stood against Trump? Would you say that they haven't supported him during his presidency?

Why haven't they released the data yet then? If it's so clear and obvious one would expect it to be circulating in the public sphere more prominently.

What are the clear claims they are making?

Barring a historical recount variance in multiple states he is, in fact, the president elect.

 

[Legacy]

Republican wins in House

Republican wins in House

Republicans had a much better showing than estimated, flipping seven seats from Democrats who had flipped Republican seats in 2018. Of the thirty-one seats Dems flipped in 2018, seventeen were retained - but had been predicted as "Solid" or "Likely" Dem. Dems flipped three seats, though two were those re-districted in NC by the courts. Two in Pennsylvania that were also re-districted prior to 2018 by the courts were retained by Dems. All of those four were held to be illegal.

Outside of the re-districted seats in NC and Pennsylvania, the Dems flipped only one seat though the same candidates from 2018 ran in 2020 with the decisive margin in '18 being 1,000 votes.

Of those thirty-one districts, all but four are rated Republican districts. Two are rated Democratic and two Even, based on prior voting compared to an average nationwide. Despite Trump losng the Presidency, the Reps did quite well reflecting a movement in those generally Republican back. The statement in 2018 was rightly attributed to a negative response to Donald Trump's first two years in office.

Outside of the four re-districted, Dems flipped only one House seat. Four House seats have yet to be decided. In all four, Republicans lead. One of those is another probably flip to Republicans. Two others are separated by slim margins - 47 and 104 votes - with the fourth just over 1,000 vote lead. Three are in California and one is in Iowa.

Another Republican at the head of the ticket would probably have gained more House seats and may well have won the Presidency. His handling of the Covid pandemic and the resultant economic collapse was probably the deciding factor in his defeat, while Rep districts with slight Republican voting histories that flipped back reflect an overall lean to local Republicans not necessarily assigned blame to those.

Whether the scare tactics about Dem socialism and rampant breakdown of law and order had any effect on the House races outside of two Florida districts with Cuban-Americans is debatable, but probably attributed by voters to the division politics of the last four years.

So, many Republican leaning districts voters split their tickets, voting for Biden and their Republican candidate for the House. As far aa Florida, the GOP retains their hold in their legislature and will re-district to their advantage with the results going to courts.

 

[Bishop2b5]

You...brought up voter fraud in 2016 and conflated terms.

Look, it's obvious we aren't going to agree on the Mueller report which stated pretty clearly that it did not exonerate Trump and that he was immune from prosecution within the scope of the investigation.

SMH

 

[Blazers46]

If an election could be so easily “rigged” don’t you think the guy who had a bunch of his 2016 campaign team land in jail and has engaged in nefarious behavior as related to his business dealings throughout his entire career would rig it?

Trump supporters are quickly becoming the new Clinton supporters.

Thinking of printing up some “I’m with him” t shirts. Lol.

So what exactly are you admitting about Clinton supporters?

I would say just being a career politician you can almost assume they would be just as, if not more, nefarious than a career business man.

 

[Blazers46]

Speaking of laughing, you're the second poster in a matter of hours (must be all the rage on r/Conservative) to say Hunter's laptop has more evidence than the Special Counsel and Senate Reports. My side is going to hurt all day laughing at this.

Trump was impeached on hearsay, dems used the liar liar pants on fire argument to impeach.

 

[Bishop2b5]

This applies to lots of people in this thread... including myself, I'm sure.

 

[bobbyok1]

When you say both parties, which prominent Republican's have stood against Trump? Would you say that they haven't supported him during his presidency?

Why haven't they released the data yet then? If it's so clear and obvious one would expect it to be circulating in the public sphere more prominently.

What are the clear claims they are making?

Barring a historical recount variance in multiple states he is, in fact, the president elect.

I haven’t the time to track down these questions in full. But, I do think I have answered some of them already. Like your question to why they haven’t released the compelling data yet of systematic computer fraud. As I said, they are crossing their I’s and dotting their T’s.

As far as Republicans who opposed Trump, McCain, Romney, Bush, Colin Powell, John Bolton.
This does not include the silent opposition. Where was McConnell the days following the election? Where were MAN/MOST of the Republican Senators and house Members? Silent. Until it became more obvious Trump was not done, then they began rallying. Many are just riding his coattails and hoping he will go away sooner than later.

I would say those that don't support him do so mostly because they are getting their pockets lined financially and Trump threatens that. He has gone after lobbyist, he has gone after big pharma, he has clearly stated a second term he will pursue congressional term limits. These only are plenty enough reasons for them to undermine him, or simply fail to support him whether vocal (which is political suicide for most Republicans right now due to Trumps popularity with the base) or in silence.

If you believe you have irrefutable proof that will change public opinion on the dime, its is reasonable to believe they are releasing it when they think it is the best timing, not based upon the whims of people like you and me and what we think is best.

I have a question for you. Why is it that Biden underperformed Clinton in every major city, EXCEPT 4 major cities in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan?

So we are just to believe that Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Detroit all came out at the 90-95% turn out rate? The same cities that ALL mysteriously stopped counting in the middle of the night?

You don’t see anything suspicious there? Where there is smoke, there is fire. And Trumps campaign claims to be holding the evidence, and will be taking it to the courts and releasing it as they see the timing is best based upon their readiness.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...yes-i-think-this-election-was-stolen-n2579970

 

[IrishLax]

I haven’t the time to track down all of these questions. And in part I think I have answered some
of them already. Like your question to why they haven’t released the compelling data yet of systematic computer fraud. As I said, they are crossing their I’s and dotting their T’s.

If you believe you have irrefutable proof that will change public opinion on the dime, its is reasonable to believe they are releasing it when they think it is the best timing, not based upon the whims of people like you and me and what we think is best.

I have a question for you. Why is it that Biden underperformed Clinton in every major city, EXCEPT 4 major cities in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan?

So we are just to believe that Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Detroit all came out at the 90-95% turn out rate? The same cities that ALL mysteriously stopped counting in the middle of the night?

You don’t see anything suspicious there? Where there is smoke, there is fire. And Trumps campaign claims to be holding the evidence, and will be taking it to the courts and releasing it as they see the timing is best based upon their readiness.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...yes-i-think-this-election-was-stolen-n2579970

I'm sorry, but this simply isn't true. Where are you getting this information?

For example, Trump did better in Philadelphia this time around than in 2016.

While the final votes are still being counted, Biden’s margin over Trump in the city is on track to be over 450,000 or even 460,000. That’s a huge advantage, and crucial in a state he won by what’s likely to be around 100,000 votes. But it would still be smaller than Hillary Clinton’s 475,000-vote edge in Philadelphia in 2016.

The number of Philadelphians who turned out to vote in last week’s presidential election has not budged much since 2016. While Philadelphians did their part, with local organizers stepping up to turn out voters, the big increases in Democratic turnout across the state came from counties outside Philadelphia.

Biden got 584k votes in Philadelphia same as Clinton got in 2016. Meanwhile, Trump got marginally more votes. I don't know why you're lying about mythical increased turnout in Philadelphia -- or making up a "95%" voting rate -- or pretending that's what ultimately drove the election results.

 

[TorontoGold]

I haven’t the time to track down these questions in full. But, I do think I have answered some of them already. Like your question to why they haven’t released the compelling data yet of systematic computer fraud. As I said, they are crossing their I’s and dotting their T’s.

As far as Republicans who opposed Trump, McCain, Romney, Bush, Colin Powell, John Bolton.
This does not include the silent opposition. Where was McConnell the days following the election? Where were MOST of the Republican Senators and house Members? Silent. Until it became more obvious Trump was not done, then they began rallying. Many are just riding his coattails and hoping he will go away sooner than later.

If you believe you have irrefutable proof that will change public opinion on the dime, its is reasonable to believe they are releasing it when they think it is the best timing, not based upon the whims of people like you and me and what we think is best.

I have a question for you. Why is it that Biden underperformed Clinton in every major city, EXCEPT 4 major cities in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan?

So we are just to believe that Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Detroit all came out at the 90-95% turn out rate? The same cities that ALL mysteriously stopped counting in the middle of the night?

You don’t see anything suspicious there? Where there is smoke, there is fire. And Trumps campaign claims to be holding the evidence, and will be taking it to the courts and releasing it as they see the timing is best based upon their readiness.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...yes-i-think-this-election-was-stolen-n2579970

Would a thorough detailed team really hold a press conference from the parking lot of a landscaping company? That strikes me as a desperate move, and not one indicative of a team focused on the facts.

Over the past 4 years, I don't know how you can say that Republican's haven't supported Trump.

Mysteriously stopped counting? You know, people need to sleep at some point right. You do, also realize that they weren't allowed to count votes before election day, right? These states would have been called earlier if they had been allowed to count.

 

[Rocket89]

I have a question for you. Why is it that Biden underperformed Clinton in every major city, EXCEPT 4 major cities in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan?

So we are just to believe that Atlanta, Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Detroit all came out at the 90-95% turn out rate? The same cities that ALL mysteriously stopped counting in the middle of the night?

You don’t see anything suspicious there? Where there is smoke, there is fire. And Trumps campaign claims to be holding the evidence, and will be taking it to the courts and releasing it as they see the timing is best based upon their readiness.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...yes-i-think-this-election-was-stolen-n2579970

Complete lies. Just a quick look at 2016 and Biden outperformed Clinton in the following counties:

Maricopa (Phoenix)
Biden +2.2 to Clinton -2.9

Mecklenburg (Charlotte)
Biden +35.1 to Clinton +29.4

Hennepin (Minneapolis)
Biden +43.4 to Clinton +34.9

Denver
Biden +61.4 to Clinton 54.8

Hillsborogh (Manchester NH)
Biden +7.7 to Clinton -0.2

Dallas
Biden +31.6 to Clinton +26.2

Harris (Houston)
Biden +13.3 to Clinton +12.4

Franklin (Columbus OH)
Biden +31.2 to Clinton +25.9

Richmond
Biden +68.4 to Clinton +63.5

Suffolk (Boston)
Biden +62.7 to Clinton +62.3

Duval (Jacksonville)
Biden +3.8 to Clinton -1.4

Marion (Indianapolis)
Biden +29.0 to Clinton +22.5

For goodness sake, Biden is going to end up doubling Clinton's popular vote margin from 2016. Biden outright flipped a bunch of counties from 2016 outside of GA/PA/WI/MI.

 

[GowerND11]

I'm sorry, but this simply isn't true. Where are you getting this information?

For example, Trump did better in Philadelphia this time around than in 2016.

Biden got 584k votes in Philadelphia same as Clinton got in 2016. Meanwhile, Trump got marginally more votes. I don't know why you're lying about mythical increased turnout in Philadelphia -- or making up a "95%" voting rate -- or pretending that's what ultimately drove the election results.

This, and you had a massive loss in 3rd party voters this election. Why? Because people felt that voting 3rd party this election would be a wasted vote, so many voted for Biden or Trump over what they had done in 2016.

 

[sharksamardzija8345]

This applies to lots of people in this thread... including myself, I'm sure.

Mmhmm

 

[Rogue219]

1-25 in court now.

 

[bobbyok1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umNbSvqozwQ

 

[TorontoGold]

What this thread has turned into

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">When you think about it like this election was kinda shady bro like <a href="https://t.co/jDyHDWNvHM">pic.twitter.com/jDyHDWNvHM</a></p>— Karan Menon (@TheKaranMenon) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheKaranMenon/status/1328751701667446784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 17, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Blazers46]

What this thread has turned into

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">When you think about it like this election was kinda shady bro like <a href="https://t.co/jDyHDWNvHM">pic.twitter.com/jDyHDWNvHM</a></p>— Karan Menon (@TheKaranMenon) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheKaranMenon/status/1328751701667446784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 17, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Indian version of a Karen is a Karan

 

[arahop]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umNbSvqozwQ

Here's some news in the real world.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-lawsuit-pennsylvania-idUSKBN27X16O

And here is what don is doing
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/securi...tion-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063

what a big bag of mashed up asshole.
trump and his loyalists. the whole lot of them.

 

[Legacy]

GOP attempts in Pennsylvania and Michigan

GOP attempts in Pennsylvania and Michigan

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled against Trump and GOP 5-2 on Tuesday that the Philadelphia Board of Elections acted within its authority in regulating the positioning of election observers. That was the only court victory in election lawsuits across the country that Trump had won.

The argument by Trump's lawyers that because observers were not closer then all ballots should be disqualified was soundly rejected by the Court not only by the five in the. majority but also those in dissent.

Chief Justice Thomas G. Saylor wrote in his dissent, which was joined by one other justice, that

“Short of demonstrated fraud, the notion that presumptively valid ballots cast by the Pennsylvania electorate would be disregarded based on isolated procedural irregularities that have been redressed — thus disenfranchising potentially thousands of voters — is misguided.”

In a five-hour hearing in another court in Williamsport, Rudy Giuliani asserted before U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann without evidence that a “Mafia-like” cabal of Democratic leaders in cities nationwide used mail ballots to rig the election in Joe Biden’s favor. The judge seemed equally taken aback by the Trump campaign’s proposed remedy that he should bar Pennsylvania from certifying its final vote tally. Giuliani argued all mail-in ballots from seven democratic counties, including Allegheny County, should be disqualified and not counted.

“At bottom, you’re asking this court to invalidate some 6.8 million votes thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the commonwealth. Can you tell me how this result could possibly be justified?”

Mark Aronchick, an attorney representing the counties. in his rebuttal to the various claims and allegations presented by Giuliani accusing him of being “ignorant” of the law, living in “some fantasy world,” and perpetuating wild conspiracy theories that were “disgraceful in an American courtroom.”

As Giuliani presented no specific allegation of fraud let alone any evidence of fraud, the Court was asked to dismiss the case. Trump and the GOP are seeking to block the certification of the votes of the largest Pennsylvania counties.

In Michigan, where two lower courts failed to block the GOP attempts to block certification of the votes, the fight continued in Detroit where the two Republican members of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers initially voted against certifying the county's November election results, resulting in a 2-2 tie. Just minutes after the Republican members had voted against certifying the results, the Michigan Republican Party released a statement from Laura Cox, who chairs the state party:.

"I am proud that, due to the efforts of the Michigan Republican Party, the Republican National Committee and the Trump Campaign, enough evidence of irregularities and potential voter fraud was uncovered resulting in the Wayne County Board of Canvassers refusing to certify their election results."

At one point, a Republican board member, Monica Palmer, had made a motion to “certify the results in the communities other than the city of Detroit” which is 78% African American and their votes would have been disenfranchised. The conspiracy theory perpetuated there is that Dominion Voting Systems generated 100,000 votes for Biden although how and specifics are lacking and no evidence has been presented in a court.

The uproar over the Republican members failure to vote was immediate and scathing as the meeting was televised. Never had a Board of Canvassers ever failed to certify a vote, let alone have a member propose to selectively eliminate a portion of the county's votes. Both Republican members backtracked and changed their votes and certification of Wayne County's vote was unanimous.

 

[Legacy]

Maricopa County vendor Dominion Voting Systems at center of false conspiracies (AZ Mirror)

JOINT STATEMENT FROM ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT COORDINATING COUNCIL & THE ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR COORDINATING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
Original release date: November 12, 2020

WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.

“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.

“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

Trump has now fired the head of the agency because "there were massive improprieties and fraud" as he continues to try to convince Americans that they should not trust the integrity of our elections with conspiracy theories.

 

[ulukinatme]

This applies to lots of people in this thread... including myself, I'm sure.

Twitter is such a cesspool. Someone tweeted the other day that right of center conservatives get called Nazis on a regular basis....a pretty fair and factual statement. The responses? Images of one idiot flying a Nazi flag at a big protest, the guy that no one wants there to begin with. Who knows, he may not even be conservative. They use that as "evidence" that all conservatives are Nazis. John Wayne Gacy was a Democrat, but that doesn't mean all liberals are serial killers. It's a stupid connection, you can't choose what nutjobs decide to belong and that's the unfortunate nature of a two party system.

They go on and on, making claims that all conservatives are white supremacists because they voted for X candidate, when the reality is many voters often see red or blue and vote accordingly (Especially the uninformed voters). The candidate in question isn't even close to racist, but because he's conservative they think he is anyway. There's crazy claims that there are hundreds of Nazis voted into office right now. Some of these people need to go back to history class, it's ridiculous. It's no wonder they thought this country was doomed even before the pandemic hit.

You try to set some of these people straight in a calm, collected manner and point out that almost all conservatives would like nothing more than for some of these extremists (Both sides) to go rot in hell. You try to reason that 73 million conservative voters are certainly not all racists, not by a long shot. Then then proceed to call you a Nazi and block you, proving the original point all along. It's bonkers.

Don't get me wrong, I know there are plenty of delusional idiots on our side too...that's just been my experience the last few days.

 

[Irish#1]

Here's some news in the real world.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-lawsuit-pennsylvania-idUSKBN27X16O

And here is what don is doing
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/securi...tion-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063

what a big bag of mashed up asshole.
trump and his loyalists. the whole lot of them.

Trump fires head of election cybersecurity who debunked conspiracy theories
CISA Director Christopher Krebs had recently butted heads with the White House over his agency's Rumor Control blog, which rebuts false claims of election fraud and hacking.

I laughed when I saw that. Given Trump's history you knew that had to be coming. It's been his modus operandi since he took office. I just wonder why it took so long?

On a side note, you seem extremely bitter. Trump is on his way out, yet you post like he got re-elected.

 

[Polish Leppy 22]

Here's some news in the real world.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-lawsuit-pennsylvania-idUSKBN27X16O

And here is what don is doing
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/securi...tion-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063

what a big bag of mashed up asshole.
trump and his loyalists. the whole lot of them.

Some more real world news for ya. Now go run and hide for a few days, because that's what you do when presented with stuff you don't like:

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics...tates-office-says/5W734FA755CK3NCR4P7A27DXVM/
More votes were just magically "discovered."

https://www.freep.com/story/news/lo...yne-county-election-certification/6309668002/
They had to STRIKE A DEAL to certify the election results here.

Ilhan Omar just compared MAGA rallies to Klan rallies.

A black, female Trump supporter was physically assaulted (while pushing her child in a stroller) by BLM this week. Catch the irony there if you can.

 

[NorthDakota]

I laughed when I saw that. Given Trump's history you knew that had to be coming. It's been his modus operandi since he took office. I just wonder why it took so long?

On a side note, you seem extremely bitter. Trump is on his way out, yet you post like he got re-elected.

Many liberals/nevertrump wont admit it, but Trump gives them oxygen. Some people need to be outraged, they need something to fuel their fire and Donald gives them that.

Plenty of conservatives are the same way. I fall into that category from time to time (maybe more lol).

 

[bobbyok1]

Kraken

https://fb.watch/1QZSCig-xV/

 

[IrishLax]

Kraken

https://fb.watch/1QZSCig-xV/

Yeah, sorry. I'd like you to address what was brought up in posts #27667 through #27670 before you continue spamming this thread with videos.

Do you have any response to the multiple people, including myself, that pointed out the factual errors in your post about voting patterns in the cities you listed? Are you willing to acknowledge that what you posted was veritably false?

 

[Rogue219]

If you take away California, the Pac 12 becomes the Pac 8.

 

[Armyirish47]

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics...tates-office-says/5W734FA755CK3NCR4P7A27DXVM/
More votes were just magically "discovered."

How is it magic when the process did exactly what it was supposed to do, catch human error? Just curious.

 

[Legacy]

How is it magic when the process did exactly what it was supposed to do, catch human error? Just curious.

I don't follow the logic of finding votes in counties that voted for Trump and Republicans as nefarious with the implied conclusion those votes should be thrown out.

If so, that probably lowers the vote totals of all the down ballot Reps. Really? Both Senatorial races should be smaller margins for the Reps?

If all those ballots have signatures confirming the validity of the voter and were submitted on time, the system works. Every vote is counted.

Giuiiani-world crazy. Show the evidence in court of fraud.

The Rep Secretary of State and his family in Ga getting death threats? Loony-tunes.

 

[NorthDakota]

If you take away California, the Pac 12 becomes the Pac 8.

A boy can dream. In the meantime I'll wait patiently for the earthquake to take them out.