My kids actually don't even like football. Maybe I should slap them for that.
Only slap? Try something that gets the message across.
![]()
Dude, that's what I do if the slap doesn't work.
I think there are better things the NFL should be worrying about then Lynch's postgame interviews.
You don't just stop enforcing some of your rules because there are "better things" to be worried about.
Actually, it's in the NFL Media Policy and is a guideline in the code of conduct all players sign. So technically, it is his job to talk to media.
Opinions aside, Wooly stated a fact: players are obligated to perform media duties, and that duty is increased for star players/faces of the franchise. It is part of the trade off for making extra millions off endorsements and other revenue stream the NFL provided the player. This is a necessary part of the job, and players can either understand that or be fined without sympathy. End of story.
Players – Players must be available to the media following every game and regularly during the practice week as required under league rules and their contracts and as noted above. It is not permissible for any player or any group of players to boycott the media. Star players, or other players with unusually heavy media demands, must be available to the media that regularly cover their teams at least once during the practice week in addition to their required post-game media availability. This applies to a maximum of one or two players per team only. The minimum for such players does not include other required media obligations such as visiting team conference calls, network production meetings, and national media interviews arranged by the team.
All NFL players, upon request of their club public relations director, are required to participate in weekly conference calls with the media from the opposing team’s city. While a player is encouraged to be available for this call every time he is requested by his club public relations director, no player is required to do more than five such opposing team/media conference calls each regular season. No player, however, can refuse to participate in the weekly media conference call during the playoffs.
But, as Wooly stated, it is part of their job that they voluntarily signed up for so they can't complain. However, I don't have a problem with the way Marshawn acts around the media and I've heard he gets fined all the time by the NFL for it. (I could be wrong on that.)
Maybe have an option to donate some money to the local paper instead of talking to the media. At least let the reporters still get paid and try to keep the paper industry afloat or something like that.
That is more along the lines of what I was thinking. Make it more beneficial to the league to have the right players interviewed thus more beneficial to the media also.
So you think the media shouldn't be able to choose who they think is most beneficial to them? Do they not know enough about their own business to make their own decisions?
So you think the media shouldn't be able to choose who they think is most beneficial to them? Do they not know enough about their own business to make their own decisions?
Again, he asked for suggestions so I just tossed this out.
God I love how you twist everything I say...
Now maybe you can tell me how the media sees it to be beneficial to interview Lynch when they know what the outcome will be?
He has given some great interviews before...
How did I twist your words? You said, "thus more beneficial to the media also." and I simply asked if you believe that they don't know what's in their own best interest. How would the NFL know what is best for the media? Simple question, really. I didn't twist your words, I simply asked for clarification. With your response above, I am to assume (correct me if i'm wrong) that you do not believe that they should be able to choose what is best for them.
You posted a bad interview. I have to assume (you didn't specifically state, after all) that since it's a bad interview, paired with your previous comment, that you are using it to validate that they indeed do not know what's best for their business?
Ironically, they don't know whats best for them, but here we are sitting on a Notre Dame board discussing Marshawn Lynch's interview. Seems to me that they sure are getting a lot of traction for such a poor decision in interviewee. lol
You have been assuming all day and you know what they say about people who assume.
First of all, I posted the video because I thought it was funny! If you don't think its funny then hit the back button on your browser and carry on. I asked the question what are your thoughts, I guess for people like you I should be more specific. I was looking for answers more based on if it was funny or not.
I don't have the time nor have the want to defend myself to you. This is an opinionated message board to which I will take full advantage of and express my opinion. I'm not one of the serious people (see yourself) that feels the need to defend everything and take everything serious.
Sit back relax and enjoy the video if you wish not to then I'm sure there are other threads on this board that you can partake in. Have a lovely day Wooly!
I think it's pretty funny. He just doesn't like dealing with the media, I honestly don't get why they even bother with him. He's not going to give them some earth-shattering quote. The media should just spend their time with other Seattle players who are more open.
The media people who get butthurt about this are the worst too. His job is to play football, its not to answer questions if he doesn't want to do so.
Players must be available to the media following every game and regularly during the practice week as required under league rules and their contracts and as noted above. It is not permissible for any player or any group of players to boycott the media.
So because you can't write coherent thought, the rest of us should keep our opinions to ourselves? Even though you specifically asked for them?
Ok. I think I will stay right here though, make myself comfy, and continue to answer your questions. I hope you have a splendid afternoon as well!
Coherent thought? Care to explain what wasn't coherent? I asked opinions on if people thought it was funny or not right? I didn't ask you to come and tell me your thoughts on NFL policy or anything like that. I'm glad that you feel the need to chime in on all of my posts.
This will be my last question for you, Wooly did you think it was funny what Marshawn Lynch did? If yes please explain, if no then state a simple no and that will suffice. Thanks!
Your rambling nonsensical topic is what's not coherent. You love them being jerks to the media, but the media should leave them alone. It's not their job to do interviews, but you change the subject when we point out that it is in their contract. You want the league to make decisions for the media, but you're not saying that you think the NFL knows their business better than they do. You didn't like TN's analogy to his kid, so you insulted him. I could go on, but i'm sure you are fully capable of simply reading your posts. Maybe you should try that before hitting submit as well?
Wooly no pun intended but I thought of you when I seen this!
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/eJWkoXsuE8I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>