rtrn2glory
Well-known member
- Messages
- 16,496
- Reaction score
- 6,866
So they're paying for basically half the roster with 18-20 million just to put a patch on the jersey? Yeah no brainer I don't care how ugly it is
I don’t understand how OSU’s is and ours isn’t. I’m not doubting you but I haven’t a clue how this is dispersed.Our's does not include NIL opportunities it looks like
It’s interesting that this is the thing that has so many fired up. I have been a proponent of athletes getting compensation for a long time, but I was very fearful of ND not stepping up and playing the NIL game to the extent that other institutions would. To my surprise, they have. With all the changes that have happened in college football over the last five years this sponsorship patch just seemed inevitable and it’s just kinda meh to me. Go win the Natty. Then spend the SOFI money to win another one. Use that money to keep the best fucking coach in college football in South Bend as long as possible.
SoFi is funding a $1.4 million annual program for the university's "4 for Forever" campaign. This funds walk-on tuition scholarships and provides student-athletes with financial education and career development, rather than direct cash marketing payouts to individual star players.. This is what I have found so far. That sounds good, but in the world of NIL we need opportunities for athletes to make legit money in the 3rd party martket. If the PCSA passes it will reduce NIL collectives and we have to have legit NIL avenues for our athletes.I don’t understand how OSU’s is and ours isn’t. I’m not doubting you but I haven’t a clue how this is dispersed.
I will do anything for love - - but I won't do thattttFans: All I want is for ND to win one natty in my lifetime!! Is that too much to ask?
ND: What if we put a sponsorship patch on the uniforms?
Fans: Yeah, I guess it is too much to ask…
They are actually not bad, but I wish we went with UNICEF or something.Mostly irrelevant to this thread but I've had overall awesome experiences (as awesome as one can have with a bank) with Sofi- they gave me a better mortgage rate than every other provider out there and the process was easy. Their high yield savings account is still maintaining a strong rate after 3+ years.
I guess I have mellowed with age. Ten years ago I would have been right there with you. Now? Meh…I think my outrage is that I recognize that the toothpaste is not out of the tube. It is merely beginning to leave the tube. One patch is "annoying but no big deal." Ok. But if one patch is acceptable, why not two? Why not put logos on the field? Why not rename the stadium? If we're winning nattys, who cares? It's just the cost of doing business these days. Just keep the hypothetical future dopamine hits coming.
Every justification provided by fans to excuse this will only make college admins bolder in the future.
Exactly and in 5 years rosters will be 100 MillionSo they're paying for basically half the roster with 18-20 million just to put a patch on the jersey? Yeah no brainer I don't care how ugly it is
Hell, five years ago I would be grabbing a pitchfork . Now I am worried about NIL carve out opportunities for our athletes.I guess I have mellowed with age. Ten years ago I would have been right there with you. Now? Meh…
This.I get it.. but I absolutely hate it.
I think my outrage is that I recognize that the toothpaste is not out of the tube. It is merely beginning to leave the tube. One patch is "annoying but no big deal." Ok. But if one patch is acceptable, why not two? Why not put logos on the field? Why not rename the stadium? If we're winning nattys, who cares? It's just the cost of doing business these days. Just keep the hypothetical future dopamine hits coming.
Every justification provided by fans to excuse this will only make college admins bolder in the future.
"Everyone used to hate it but now nobody cares"Hate the patch... But $20 more million annually? If that directly contributes to ND landing 5 more top 100 players each year, sign me the hell up.
Nobody is going to care about a patch if it's being worn by ND teams winning Nattys.
The NHL moved to this model a couole years back and fans hated it at first. Now nobody even cares and I don't think most fans even recognize that they exist on the uniform. They're just back to being focused on the game.
This is dumb and I hate it very much but can also get over it if it means my team will compete for national titles every year.
It is just a relief for the university, it does nothing for recruiting. So yea! the university saved some cash, but it does nothing to make us better. The OSU deal had a NIL component that helped open doors for them. This one does not.That's the neat part: It doesn't.
UA is definitely promoting sponsorship opportunities to athletes for NIL.I’m not saying this does or does not have NIL implications, but I do remember thinking it was a missed opportunity that the Under Armour contract didn’t, yet it’s been mentioned multiple times how they helped out with Joey O’Brien and other football players. I think our admin just likes to keep that sort of quid pro quo quieter than most