Stadium Renovations, Uniform Changes

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
17,280
Reaction score
17,338
It’s interesting that this is the thing that has so many fired up. I have been a proponent of athletes getting compensation for a long time, but I was very fearful of ND not stepping up and playing the NIL game to the extent that other institutions would. To my surprise, they have. With all the changes that have happened in college football over the last five years this sponsorship patch just seemed inevitable and it’s just kinda meh to me. Go win the Natty. Then spend the SOFI money to win another one. Use that money to keep the best fucking coach in college football in South Bend as long as possible.

I think my outrage is that I recognize that the toothpaste is not out of the tube. It is merely beginning to leave the tube. One patch is "annoying but no big deal." Ok. But if one patch is acceptable, why not two? Why not put logos on the field? Why not rename the stadium? If we're winning nattys, who cares? It's just the cost of doing business these days. Just keep the hypothetical future dopamine hits coming.

Every justification provided by fans to excuse this will only make college admins bolder in the future.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,423
Reaction score
3,359
I don’t understand how OSU’s is and ours isn’t. I’m not doubting you but I haven’t a clue how this is dispersed.
SoFi is funding a $1.4 million annual program for the university's "4 for Forever" campaign. This funds walk-on tuition scholarships and provides student-athletes with financial education and career development, rather than direct cash marketing payouts to individual star players.. This is what I have found so far. That sounds good, but in the world of NIL we need opportunities for athletes to make legit money in the 3rd party martket. If the PCSA passes it will reduce NIL collectives and we have to have legit NIL avenues for our athletes.
 

FightingIrishLover7

All troll, no substance
Messages
12,944
Reaction score
7,963
Fans: All I want is for ND to win one natty in my lifetime!! Is that too much to ask?

ND: What if we put a sponsorship patch on the uniforms?

Fans: Yeah, I guess it is too much to ask…
I will do anything for love - - but I won't do thatttt
(typical fat meatloaf ND fan)
 

notredomer23

Staph Member
Messages
17,950
Reaction score
18,415
Mostly irrelevant to this thread but I've had overall awesome experiences (as awesome as one can have with a bank) with Sofi- they gave me a better mortgage rate than every other provider out there and the process was easy. Their high yield savings account is still maintaining a strong rate after 3+ years.



This message is brought to you by the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame, sponsored by Sofi Technologies
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,423
Reaction score
3,359
Mostly irrelevant to this thread but I've had overall awesome experiences (as awesome as one can have with a bank) with Sofi- they gave me a better mortgage rate than every other provider out there and the process was easy. Their high yield savings account is still maintaining a strong rate after 3+ years.
They are actually not bad, but I wish we went with UNICEF or something.
 

NDohio

Well-known member
Messages
5,895
Reaction score
3,121
I think my outrage is that I recognize that the toothpaste is not out of the tube. It is merely beginning to leave the tube. One patch is "annoying but no big deal." Ok. But if one patch is acceptable, why not two? Why not put logos on the field? Why not rename the stadium? If we're winning nattys, who cares? It's just the cost of doing business these days. Just keep the hypothetical future dopamine hits coming.

Every justification provided by fans to excuse this will only make college admins bolder in the future.
I guess I have mellowed with age. Ten years ago I would have been right there with you. Now? Meh…
 

tko

I am Legend
Messages
8,552
Reaction score
1,746
I think my outrage is that I recognize that the toothpaste is not out of the tube. It is merely beginning to leave the tube. One patch is "annoying but no big deal." Ok. But if one patch is acceptable, why not two? Why not put logos on the field? Why not rename the stadium? If we're winning nattys, who cares? It's just the cost of doing business these days. Just keep the hypothetical future dopamine hits coming.

Every justification provided by fans to excuse this will only make college admins bolder in the future.

Coveleski Stadium's wall used to be all green, pure, and now it's an eye sore. We'll see what happens, however, room should be made for Hacienda for sure.
 

dankgesang

Troll Tide
Messages
471
Reaction score
739
Hate the patch... But $20 more million annually? If that directly contributes to ND landing 5 more top 100 players each year, sign me the hell up.

Nobody is going to care about a patch if it's being worn by ND teams winning Nattys.

The NHL moved to this model a couole years back and fans hated it at first. Now nobody even cares and I don't think most fans even recognize that they exist on the uniform. They're just back to being focused on the game.
"Everyone used to hate it but now nobody cares"

Cool man, great argument. put it on the gravestone of everything that used to be beautiful about this sport.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,423
Reaction score
3,359
That's the neat part: It doesn't.
It is just a relief for the university, it does nothing for recruiting. So yea! the university saved some cash, but it does nothing to make us better. The OSU deal had a NIL component that helped open doors for them. This one does not.
 
Last edited:

DomeFieldAdvantage

Well-known member
Messages
389
Reaction score
638
I’m not saying this does or does not have NIL implications, but I do remember thinking it was a missed opportunity that the Under Armour contract didn’t, yet it’s been mentioned multiple times how they helped out with Joey O’Brien and other football players. I think our admin just likes to keep that sort of quid pro quo quieter than most
 

allenm5333

Well-known member
Messages
3,701
Reaction score
3,582
I’m not saying this does or does not have NIL implications, but I do remember thinking it was a missed opportunity that the Under Armour contract didn’t, yet it’s been mentioned multiple times how they helped out with Joey O’Brien and other football players. I think our admin just likes to keep that sort of quid pro quo quieter than most
UA is definitely promoting sponsorship opportunities to athletes for NIL.
 

jerseyborn1971

Well-known member
Messages
467
Reaction score
747
-No freshman should play!
-No night games!
-Athletes should always live in the dorms!
-No lowering of academic standards!
-No transfers!
-No training table. Players should eat in the dining halls!
-No alt uniforms except the greens, and only then for playing the #1 team in the nation or USC!
-No jumbotron!
-No artificial turf!
-No paying players!

These were the disgusting things that were going to ruin Notre Dame football. Thankfully, the school is now not slow to embrace the things they HAVE to embrace to not only compete, but dominate the sport.

It's a tiny patch of fabric stitched onto a larger piece of fabric. Rockne, Leahy, Holtz...they ALL would have put it on there if it helped ND win.
 

OrlaNDomer

Well-known member
Messages
613
Reaction score
413
As long as it’s the best possible offer whatever. New world. I’ll deal with it as long as it leads us to winning a championship.
 
Top