Irish Insanity
Well-known member
- Messages
- 9,885
- Reaction score
- 584
It can if it's declined
You can't decline a personal foul.
It can if it's declined
My postgame observations:
1) Rice scores 17 and Michigan scores 0. This says something about our defense.
2) Will Fuller is developing into a nice receiver.
3) Total punt return yards in 2013: 106 yards and total punt return yards in 2014: 107 yards. Special teams is starting to feel special.
4) I don't see any improvements this team needs to make, but when we get our 3 starters back (hopefully) we will get quite a nice upgrade.
Seriously? Way too many drops. Not a big deal during blowouts but could kill us in a close game.
Our running game was awful last night. Ran 31 times for only 54 yards.
That's an easy fix. This offense is filled with weapons.
Our running game was awful last night. Ran 31 times for only 54 yards.
This was a very effective strategy against Rees and 2012 Golson. Not so much against 2014 Golson. As Kelly said in his post-game press conference:
He liked the matchups he was getting against Michigan's secondary, so he continued calling running plays into an almost always stacked box in order to keep the passing game going.
It's very telling that Cam's number gets called in the red zone.
Other than a few dropped passes and a couple of bad throws......what's not to like ?? They will only get better each week. They had intensity tonight.
Tailgating note - I noticed a lot of the girls are wearing the cutoff shorts with a real high waist. I don't like that style, it looks weird. Carry on...
I am going to miss Riggs next year. He has been such a spark plug on ST and D already.
Michigan stacked the box all night. Sometimes 7 on the line. We continued to run for the following reasons.
1. We are much stronger than them and it would pay off in the fourth.
2. Our D needed time to catch their breath a lot! We were gassed big time the first half.
3. We were up big and wanted to limit the amount of possessions Michigan would get.
4. Statistically you turn the ball over much less with runs and we again were playing defense with our offense.
This, Bog's and Irishman77's quick analysis on why we didn't run quite so well is all anyone really needs to know.
There was strategy involved to push the rock against Michigan's front.
Last week, there were complaints about the pass protection and praise for the OL's run development.
Give it time. Both elements at once will evolve more cohesively...
Tailgating note - I noticed a lot of the girls are wearing the cutoff shorts with a real high waist. I don't like that style, it looks weird. Carry on...
Agreed. I'm not the world's foremost fashion expert, but when it comes to women's clothing, the lower the waistline the better in all cases. And I'm not saying that in a creepy way because there is more to look at. I'm saying that because it is just awkward to look at, like white socks with black shoes. Even those old-school g-strings with the high waists that you see in pictures from the 80s....I'd rather look at the same woman with low-waisted jeans on than in a 80s g-string.
Here's the most important post-game observation, in my opinion:
Last year Michigan went 7-6.
I loved what I saw on Saturday, and Notre Dame should cruise to 4-0...but the real season starts when Stanford comes to town.
Girls who wear high waist shorts dont have dirty socks?High waisted womens clothing means no more:
![]()
Random thoughts:
1. Best game I have been to at Notre Dame Stadium. Electric crowd. Everyone was there by kickoff. The entire crowd was on their feet for any remotely important play. The 4th quarter was just as loud as the first as blood was in the water and we wanted the shutout so much.
2. Did I mention how great the crowd was? Student body was rocking and the stadium music was great. The players clearly fed off our energy. The 5 minutes of na na na na were amazing. Got faster and louder and the players were into that too.
3. The butthurt from the Michigan fans sitting around me was so enjoyable. They looked miserable starting from the blocked field goal. You can't erase the pick 6 from my mind even if you can erase it from the scoreboard.
4. Field looks really great. Classic look.
5. This team has swag. I'm glad they put Gardner on his ass. They knew at halftime that it was over.
6. I wore my Jaylon jersey proudly. I said it when he committed and will repeat it now. He will be better than Manti.
7. Rewatched the game on TV and I can't get over what a joke Hoke is. Dude literally just roams the sidelines clapping and wondering what the hell is going on. I would fire him immediately before any more long term damage is done.
8. That crowd tho...
True, but we have rarely played a complete game like Saturday's game. I agree Stanford will be the litmus test. How will our D line hold up against an offense capable and willing to grind out yards? Michigan had a decent amount of success running the ball. It didn't matter as they had no outside threat.
What I find notable about the game is the considerable upgrade @ the safety positions. Shumate's physicality was refreshing. He plugged holes. Red is gaining confidence. The defense is no longer playing 10 vs 11.
Golson's accuracy and pocket presence is impressive. What could have been last year...
Anyone have a good pic of Shumate's pick six? (Yeah it's a pick six to me)
The ND play by play lists, PENALTY RO (Redfield). I guess that's supposed to be Roughing the passer but obviously Gardner was not in the act of passing nor was the hitter a step or two from Gardner's passing motion and proceeded into him. Wrong description but still a foul.
Redfield's hit was a foul despite the testerone laments to the contrary on this site. Before the Targeting and Defenseless player rules went into effect it would probably have been called a clip, block in the back, or unsportsmanlike conduct ... they're interpretative calls.
Posters here are arguing Redfield didn't hit Gardner in the head or neck which applies to the Targeting Rule. He didn't but the primary objective of Targting/Defenseless is to prevent head and neck injury. Watch Gardner's head snap on the hit.
Lax argued Redfield hit him in the chest. He didn't touch his chest. He was behind him. Redfield hit him on the side in the upper shoulder, snapping Gardner's head and neck back.
Redfield also hit him with a BLIND HIT and he crouched and launched himself.
His hit comes under Rule 9-1-4 addresses hitting Defenseless players. For the past two years this type of hit has been addressed and targeted by the refs. Had the refs called Targeting Redfield would have been ejected.
Had Redfield NOT launched himself there might have been no call. And Onwualu would have kept Gardner out of the play.
Had Redfield taken one step to the left of Gardner there might not have been a call but Gardner still couldn't see him, BLIND HIT.
Argue to the semantics until the cows come home but the refs are going to FLAG this type of hit. They did last year and continue to this year.
Had this not occurred on the last play, it might have been explained better. The game was over and the BIG officiating crew wanted to get out of the stadium quicker than Hoke did.
Here's a link to a SBNation article on the play. It includes to videos, one it real time and one in slomo.
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-fo...dame-fighting-irish-michigan-wolverines-video