Ultimate Penn St. Hater
Go Irish!
- Messages
- 11,214
- Reaction score
- 377
I'm hoping a leak filters out at some point today. The suspense is killing me.
I'm hoping a leak filters out at some point today. The suspense is killing me.
I don't they should get the death penalty. I think they deserve something on the order of a 5 year post season ban, humungous financial penalties to benefit the victims, and no scholarship restrictions.
Glad it came down. Took to long.
Now, I'll take an unpopular point of view on the whole death penalty. I don;t think they should get it. And I say this in compassion for the people who it will affect - not the football program, but the people whose livelihood depends on it. I'm talking about the shop-owners and the employees and all the people who need the football program to be around so they can make a living. You know how scary it is to lose your house and not have money to feed your family??? All because some sick bastard and the almost-as-sick bastards who covered it up?
My point is...hurting innocents is not going to take away all the pain and incredible damage the victims are going through and have been going through. Personally, I'd rather not create even more victims (albeit far different victims) just to punish the criminals. Like many small college towns, the Penn St football program creates a ton of jobs that you and I don't even think about. As someone looking for work in a small town, I feel their pain.
Now, I fully appreciate those wanting the death penalty, and I've read all the arguments. I personally just don't want it to happen, and it has nothing to do with the actual football. And to those that do want it to happen, I get that...
Here is what I would do if I was the NCAA commish for penalties.
-No post season for 5 years
- No slice of the cake the conferences get from the bowl money
- 15 scholarships a year for four years... and I mean that in the true sense not the USC sense. They can have 60 scholarship players
- 1 season of playing home games in an empty stadium.
- Any player can transfer no penalty for any time during that duration
Harsh? Yes. Death penalty bad? I don't think so.
I agree with no death penalty. This was not a football issue. It was a criminal issue that just happened to involve people from the football program.
I will gladly take Breneman if he chooses to decommit.
I'm suddenly a little scared of what the NCAA is going to do. There is no way to put into words the sickening, disgusting actions taken by Sandusky and the inexcusable coverup. But the improper actions of 4 men to cover up this scandal should not blow back on the university and the students and the businesses that rely on the university. The point of punishment in a civilized country is to send a message, to deter others from committing the same crime. The men responsible should be targeted through the criminal justice system, which avoids collateral damage in the name of "justice".
Would ND take another TE? Lax I thought we were in Brennemans final group? Johnson too, though we passed so he probably would not come to ND.
Mike Farrel says Sickels and Brenneman are solid to PSU and Hackenburg and his dad will discuss tomorrow after sanctions come out
0% chance that list posted above is accurate.
I agree, just what is floating around.0% chance that list posted above is accurate.
To not punish the football program, one that was inextricably intertwined with every decision and statement from Joe Paterno, is to serve the very same purpose that Paterno intended by conspiring to cover it up in the first place. His goal, above anything else, was to protect the football program. Not punishing the football program for his actions would thus serve to achieve that very same purpose.
This wasn't some random coach at a random university. This was Joe Paterno, who was the coach for 50 some odd years. He WAS Penn State. He WAS the football program. Why else would the Athletic Director and other university officials, who technically had superiority over him, cow-tow to his desires to cover up the abuse?
The football program was the excuse behind it all. This man, who had for decades had a reputation for being a good person, allowed a man on his own football coaching staff to continue to use football facilities even after he knew about his sexual abuse of CHILDREN. In a way, the football program, given that Paterno WAS the program in so many ways, thus facilitated and covered up unbelievable transgressions by a former member of the same staff. Moreover, many of his crimes happened in football facilities themselves.
To think that the criminal justice system would provide an adequate alternative to punishing the football program presupposes that it would actually deter such conduct. In my opinion, however, it would only show that a huge part of the problem did in fact get away with it. Not to mention that Paterno is dead, and the only thing remaining to punish for his transgressions is his proxy, the football program itself.
I understand that many of the people questioning the decision to penalize the program itself don't condone in any way the horrible actions that Sandusky committed. But that really isn't the point. If Paterno, and thus by extension, the full weight of the football program and the university, hadn't actively sought to cover it up, scores of future crimes that took place in football facilities on campus could have been prevented. If that doesn't indicate that some form of penalty is warranted against a football program, I don't know what does.