That's kind of my point. Tom Brady has played in 28 playoff games and however many November/December regular season games and this has never come up before. Why did he need some magical advantage on January 18, 2015 that he's never needed in the past, especially considering that it was relatively mild that night?
Yeah except
1. There's no evidence the Colts' balls were similarly deflated.
2. This is magically the first time anyone has ever noticed the balls deflated despite there being hundreds, if not thousands of games being played under similar temperatures?
3. One of the balls magically defied the laws of physics?
4. It's not like the balls are 40 degrees. They are constantly wiped down and kept in a bag with the other balls. Which means they are almost certainly a lot warmer than the outside temperature.
I never claimed to be directly quoting him. Why else would the referees deflate Packer footballs (and Rodgers be pissed about it) other than the Packers intentionally inflate the balls above the allowable range?
Just to be fair there isn't any evidence that weren't deflated either. The Colts balls never got tested from what I have read.
Link?
Even if they didn't, if the Patriot apologist's best argument is that we don't know anything about the Colts' balls then that' says a lot.
Where is your link saying they tested the Colts balls? You are the one who made the original statement of why didn't the Colts balls change as well.
I have read about 10 articles on it so far and none have mentioned the Colts balls. Don't you think that that would be a central part of the argument. Hey look the Colts balls didn't change PSI but the Patriots balls did.
Oddly I am not a Patriots apologist (I was actually rooting for the Colts) but I think that there should be proof of cheating for punishment and just under-inflated balls (especially if they didn't test the Colts balls) is not proof, just suspicious.
The logical assumption is that the NFL tested all the balls. I'm going to believe they did until I see otherwise. And like I said, it doesn't matter that they weren't tested. If it was a weather issue this wouldn't be the first time this has ever come up, especially considering there have been much colder games.
According to a National Football League letter about the investigation into the controversy that was shared with the Globe, the Patriots were informed that the league’s initial findings indicated that the game balls did not meet specifications. The league inspected each of the Patriots’ 12 game balls twice at halftime, using different pressure gauges, and found footballs that were not properly inflated.
Again no mention of the Colts balls being tested. That should be a central part of the argument.
NFL says Patriots used 11 under-inflated footballs - Sports - The Boston Globe
It's amazing that people still try to defend all of the shady things the Patriots get involved in.
What's that old saying? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Quick question...if it isn't their main argument, what does it say about the Pats? and the 11/12 thing doesn't seem weird to you?
Also reports the Ravens complained the week prior of improper inflated kicking balls and that it had affected their kicking.
Do tell of "all of the shady things the Patriots get involved in" besides Spygate.
Very weird. A Belichick trained ball boy wouldn't make a mistake like this. The kid had one job and that was to deflate 12 footballs, not 11. DO YOUR JOB ball boy!
Also reports the Ravens complained the week prior of improper inflated kicking balls and that it had affected their kicking.
There also is a second set of six footballs, used specifically for the kicking game, that are marked appropriately and remain in the possession of officials at all times
Not weird if #12 is the kicking footbal, yes?
My wife made a comment to me when they delayed the game for a minute or so and then the announcers said something to the effect that they forgot to change out the kicking ball for the scrimmage ball and my wife said, they have different ones? Then the announcer said the kicking balls aren't rubbed up as much as the scrimmage ones
How should any punishment on this compare to Bountygate?
I think it should be right on par. Bountygate was an issue of player safety, but didn't effect the actual competition of the game in a way that gave anyone an advantage.
Inflategate was obviously an attempt at a true competitive advantage. I think the punishments from Bountygate could be imposed here, and that would seem about fair.
Do I seriously need to illustrate this nuance to you? It was "mild" for January in Massachusetts, as in "Brady has played in much worse." That has nothing to do with whether it was cold enough to deflate the balls. A "mild" August day in Orlando is still going to make you sweat your ass off.Was it relatively mild or was it so cold that the balls deflated due to the outside temperature? Pick one.
Do I seriously need to illustrate this nuance to you? It was "mild" for January in Massachusetts, as in "Brady has played in much worse." That has nothing to do with whether it was cold enough to deflate the balls. A "mild" August day in Orlando is still going to make you sweat your ass off.
Again, why is everyone flat-out ignoring SCIENTIFIC FACT? A drop from 70F to 40F results in a drop of 2 PSI. P1/P2 = T1/T2 and all that crap.
That's kind of my point. Tom Brady has played in 28 playoff games and however many November/December regular season games and this has never come up before. Why did he need some magical advantage on January 18, 2015 that he's never needed in the past, especially considering that it was relatively mild that night?
See post above. Kicking balls are different than the 12 balls each team uses on offense.
And, IIRC, the delay in game to switch out balls happened after a kickoff. Perfectly reasonable explanation for why they held the game up. The refs were doing their job!
And the problem isn't that Brady needed or didn't need the advantage of a deflated ball. It is that there are rules in place to level the playing field and IF the Patriots possibly purposely ignored those rules - they cheated.
A couple of possible reasons:First of all, he is saying that there have been thousands of footballs used in very similar conditions to Sunday night and nobody has complained about poorly inflated balls. If, as you have stated, balls casually deflate over the course of a game during cold weather, why has this not come up in the past?
I'm not saying "Brady did it but who cares because he doesn't need an advantage." I'm saying, Brady has whooped on people in much worse and DIDN'T cheat, so why would he risk it this time.And the problem isn't that Brady needed or didn't need the advantage of a deflated ball. It is that there are rules in place to level the playing field and the Patriots possibly purposely ignored those rules - they cheated.
Agree and just to add: it is not "maybe" the case that pressure falls with the temperature. It is factually true that that is what happens.*snip*