Brady did not sound very concerned about it on his radio show this morning. It would be hard to imagine a less scandalous "scandal," and if it wasn't the Patriots this would barely be a footnote.
Obviously the Patriots would have won....but how do you root for an organization that does shit like this over and over again?
NE 45 Indy 7
Just understand that asking me this question would be like someone asking you how you can root for a program that killed a student assistant, covered up a rape by a player, helped another player hoax the media to get Heisman votes, and continues to have academic cheating scandals. I feel, as you would in that situation, that the outside media and other team's fans get the story wrong and overinflate its significance because my team is an easy target. As a Patriots fan, you get the same kind of irrational nonsense that you get as a ND. You learn to wear it like a badge of honor.
You're a Yankee fan, right? Does it bother you that other fans think the Yankees late 90's run was PED enhanced? It wouldn't bother me. It doesn't bother me that people say that about the Red Sox. Opposing fans are bitches. That is a truism of sports. Anyone that cares is wasting their time.
That game was disappointing, just how i feared it would go. It feels like Luck is falling victim to the same thing in Indy that Manning did. No running game, and no defense. And now Reggie will probably retire but even if not he's about done anyways, and i dont think TY at his size is a number one receiver on his own. We now need another receiver. Not to mention Luck is gonna sign a massive contract now, its hard to see us seriously contending for a Super Bowl
Also, I know people who are angry at the Pats for making them have to cheer for "Pete the cheat"
They are more than welcome to root for the good guys!
Spygate was the NFL equivalent of speeding and was treated by the league like it was armed robbery. The media then ran with it. Everyone already hated the Patriots, so it was an easy narrative and made everyone feel better about why they couldn't beat NE. The reality is they broke a procedural rule and nobody has ever advanced a credible theory as to how it could have actually helped them do anything. (Note that you are permitted to film anything you want from the coach's box and are only restricted from filming from the sideline.)
The whole thing was kind of silly, but it is easier for most people to just lob it at the Patriots every time their team gets beat than to give it any real thought. Again, you'd say the exact same thing about the Declan Sullivan thing, right? The narrative that exists out there is inconsistent with what you actually know about it, but nobody cares enough to learn what you have and it is just easier for them to lob it at ND whenever they want to take a shot.
I get that you spin the narrative when it applies to your own team. I just don't see any other NFL team having to spin narratives so frequently.
Can't believe we're talking abut this non-story. The Patriots DO NOT manage the footballs during the game, people. It's not like college. There's no way they could have deflated the balls since the balls are in the possession of the NFL people during the whole game after having been inspected by the officials.
The under was payed out instead of the over
The under was payed out instead of the over
Lol they do.Wouldn't it make more sense for the league to require the referees to examine and document that the footballs meet regulations an hour before game time? MLB does (see 3.01 (c)):
Official Rules | MLB.com: Official info
Yet another reason MLB is superior to pro football.