ND Women's BB '16 -'17 Season
- Thread starter BGIF
- Start date
Praytorian
New member
- Messages
- 584
- Reaction score
- 17
Awesome 2nd quarter ladies.
Halftime ND 45 SU 31
Halftime ND 45 SU 31
ND +5 on Turnovers; Even on Rebs
SU dominating Assists by only shooting 36.7%
Matchup SU ND
Halftime ND 45 SU 31
ND +5 on Turnovers; Even on Rebs
SU dominating Assists by only shooting 36.7%
Matchup SU ND
HTML:
FG Made-Attem 11-30 18-32
Field Goal % 36.7 56.3
3PT Made-Atte 6-13 4-10
Three Point % 46.2 40.0
FT Made-Attem 3-4 5-7
Free Throw % 75.0 71.4
Total Rebounds 17 17
Offensive Rebs 3 1
Defensive Rebs 14 16
Team Rebounds 0 0
Assists 9 5
Steals 0 4
Blocks 2 1
Turnover 6 1
Team Turnovers 0 0
Total Turnovers 6 1
Personal Fouls 6 6ND Ind Stats
ND Ind Stats
ND Ind Stats
HTML:
STARTERS FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS
K. Westbeld F 1-4 0-1 0-0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
E. Boley F 2-4 2-3 0-0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 6
M. Mabrey G 4-8 1-5 0-0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 9
A. Ogunbowale G 8-10 1-1 4-4 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 21
L. Allen G 1-3 0-0 1-2 0 7 7 3 1 0 1 2 3
BENCH FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS
K. Nelson F 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0
J. Young G 2-3 0-0 0-1 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 4
TEAM 18-32 4-10 5-7 1 16 17 5 4 1 1 6 45
56.3% 40.0% 71.4%
NDgradstudent
Banned
- Messages
- 2,414
- Reaction score
- 165
The team can't handle prosperity. Purdue game redux.
Matchup SU ND
HTML:
FG Made-Attem 21-46 23-51
Field Goal % 45.7 45.1
3PT Made-Atte 10-22 4-16
Three Point % 45.5 25.0
FT Made-Attem 3-4 7-11
Free Throw % 75.0 63.6
Total Rebounds 26 28
Offensive Rebs 4 7
Defensive Rebs 22 21
Team Rebounds 0 0
Assists 18 8
Steals 1 5
Blocks 4 1
Turnovers 8 2
Team Turnovers 0 0
Total Turnovers 8 2
Personal Fouls 8 9
Technical Fouls 0 0
Flagrant Fouls 0 0End of 3, ND 57 SU 55
End of 3, ND 57 SU 55
End of 3, ND 57 SU 55
HTML:
STARTERS FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS
K. Westbeld F 3-6 0-1 1-2 4 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 7
E. Boley F 2-5 2-4 0-0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 6
M. Mabrey G 5-13 1-7 0-0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 2 11
A. Ogunbowale G 9-14 1-2 4-4 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 23
L. Allen G 2-6 0-0 2-4 1 9 10 6 1 0 1 2 6
BENCH FG 3PT FT OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS
K. Nelson F 0-1 0-0 0-0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0
J. Young G 2-7 0-2 0-1 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 4
TEAM 23-52 4-16 7-11 7 21 28 8 5 1 2 9 57
45.1% 25.0% 63.6%NDgradstudent
Banned
- Messages
- 2,414
- Reaction score
- 165
Stop taking shots at the start of the shot clock...what are we doing?
NDgradstudent
Banned
- Messages
- 2,414
- Reaction score
- 165
There is no getting around it: not making the Final Four, for this team, is a huge disappointment. It is particularly so when you hold a 14 point lead at halftime. Simply inexcusable.
The utter lack of defense has been a major ongoing problem in the program. UConn held excellent offensive ND teams to 58 and 53 points, respectively, in the 2014 and 2015 title games. Why can't we play elite defense like that? We're always in tight games because while we score 70 or 80 points, the other team does too. That needs to change.
The utter lack of defense has been a major ongoing problem in the program. UConn held excellent offensive ND teams to 58 and 53 points, respectively, in the 2014 and 2015 title games. Why can't we play elite defense like that? We're always in tight games because while we score 70 or 80 points, the other team does too. That needs to change.
Old Man Mike
Fast as Lightning!
- Messages
- 8,984
- Reaction score
- 6,482
To the previous poster (NDGS) --- with all due respect: shove it where the Sun don't shine. This team developed into a terrific team as the season went on, and had to play Stanford without their only rim protector --- a defensive player of the year who was listed as All-American by some. Unbelievable comments. I suggest creating your own dreamstate fantasies, thereby you'll never be "disappointed"
There is no getting around it, you never miss an opportunity to show you're a jerk.
- Messages
- 37,546
- Reaction score
- 29,005
The only sports team that owes fans anything at ND is the football team. Why? Because fans/boosters/alums spend gazillions of dollars to put a winning product on the field. And even then I'd say it's not the student athletes that owe fans anything... it's really the coaches and administrators that do and have an obligation to meet "expectations."
So, in short, I don't respect any detractors of this team especially after the injury to Turner. The players who could play and the coaches who could coach did their best and came up a point short. Oh well, thems the breaks.
So, in short, I don't respect any detractors of this team especially after the injury to Turner. The players who could play and the coaches who could coach did their best and came up a point short. Oh well, thems the breaks.
Final SU 76 ND 75
Final SU 76 ND 75
Matchup SU ND
Final SU 76 ND 75
Matchup SU ND
HTML:
FG Made-Attem 28-59 29-65
Field Goal % 47.5 44.6
3PT Made-Atte 12-26 6-21
Three Point % 46.2 28.6
FT Made-Attem 8-10 11-15
Free Throw % 80.0 73.3
Total Rebounds 35 32
Offensive Rebs 7 8
Defensive Rebs 28 24
Assists 22 11
Steals 3 7
Blocks 7 1
Total Turnovers 11 4
Personal Fouls 12 12NDgradstudent
Banned
- Messages
- 2,414
- Reaction score
- 165
The evidence is what it is. This was a problem with the program long before Turner was even on the radar. Furthermore, we weren't in the top 50 in OPP PPG this season, which was with her in the lineup.
ND OPP PPG ranking
2007-8: not top 50
2008-9: not top 50
2009-10: not top 50
2010-11: 34
2011-12: 13
2012-13: 14
2013-14: not top 50
2014-15: not top 50
2015-16: not top 50
2016-17: not top 50
UConn OPP PPG ranking
2007-8: 4
2008-9: 7
2009-10: 1
2010-11: 2
2011-12: 1
2012-13: 8
2013-14: 1
2014-15: 1
2015-16: 1
2016-17: 7
Last edited: