The theory is slovis for sure and Daniels a bit but not quite as much have shown much better ability (other than buchner running) than pyne or buchner had leading into the season, and stats back that up. Why in the heck would you not have gone after and taken a kid like slovis who threw for 3500 yds and 30tds with a 167 rating when both of your qbs had shown very very little? Worst case is buchner beats them out still and starts, or one of them transfers out. If any of our coaches thought buchner or Pyne were "IT" or championship caliber QB they should have their head checked. Everyone that saw either play in 21 or went to a practice, etc knew they had major major issues.
We didn't need a better QB to go 10-2, but I have no doubt we win 1 more game minimum if we had a player like slovis for us starting despite some coaching mistakes.
I do not think slovis is amazing, but i'm extremely confident he's better than buchner or pyne who I both think will be riding the "pyne" this year.
Jayden Daniels didn't light up the world at ASU but Kelly knew he needed more QB competition and got him, didn't hand him the job, but let him have the opportunity to win it and he turned into a darn good QB.