NDRock
Well-known member
- Messages
- 7,489
- Reaction score
- 5,448
It's a joke, maybe a bad one
Oh, I know. I was kidding saying something like that could even happen. It’s still one of the craziest sports stories that ever happened.
It's a joke, maybe a bad one
Even if Lea takes it we expect him to finish the season no?
That is what Kelly said
People overreacting big time about this. Successful programs lose coordinators all the time
Oh, I know. I was kidding saying something like that could even happen. It’s still one of the craziest sports stories that ever happened.
Pay the man.
Let's assume BK sticks around another 5 years. If Lea is having enough success at Vandy that ND would want him as Head Coach, what are the chances that he would actually leave? 5 years is a long time to become entrenched and I'm pretty skeptical that he would leave at that point. 3 years, maybe there is a shot.
I will suffer a year of Van Gorder at DC if it means Lea's d shuts down Clemson, OSU, and Bama back to back back.
I almost reject the entire premise of this question, because how does one measure success at Vandy? An 8-4 regular season is wild success for Vandy... it's happened twice in the past 38 years. Both under James Franklin. Vandy has made 9 bowl games in their history. They've never won 10 games.
Notre Dame is not going to hire an 8-4 coach from Vandy and that is their *ceiling*... I get that the money and title at your alma mater is hard to turn down. I really do. But unless Clark Lea is even better as a HC than he is as a DC he likely just torpedoed his career. Derek Mason was in a similar situation with elite defenses at Stanford... one of the hottest up-and-coming coaches around... and took Vandy to 2 of the 9 bowl games in their history. And he's now unemployed, likely to be a retread in a worse DC situation than the one he left.
The best case scenario for Lea is that he pulls a Pat Fitzgerald, but the SEC is not the Big Ten West... and Vandy isn't even Northwestern. Which seems crazy to say about a Tier 4 football school, but it's true. It's arguably more of a dead end job than Kansas or Rutgers.
I almost reject the entire premise of this question, because how does one measure success at Vandy? An 8-4 regular season is wild success for Vandy... it's happened twice in the past 38 years. Both under James Franklin. Vandy has made 9 bowl games in their history. They've never won 10 games.
Notre Dame is not going to hire an 8-4 coach from Vandy and that is their *ceiling*... I get that the money and title at your alma mater is hard to turn down. I really do. But unless Clark Lea is even better as a HC than he is as a DC he likely just torpedoed his career. Derek Mason was in a similar situation with elite defenses at Stanford... one of the hottest up-and-coming coaches around... and took Vandy to 2 of the 9 bowl games in their history. And he's now unemployed, likely to be a retread in a worse DC situation than the one he left.
The best case scenario for Lea is that he pulls a Pat Fitzgerald, but the SEC is not the Big Ten West... and Vandy isn't even Northwestern. Which seems crazy to say about a Tier 4 football school, but it's true. It's arguably more of a dead end job than Kansas or Rutgers.
If he can make ~$5M a year versus ~$1.5, who can blame him. I think we'd all take that. It sucks but it was inevitable. I really hope and expect him to finish the job this year though.
You're going to pay him an SEC head coach's salary to be a coordinator? I love Lea and am sad to see him go, but the concessions some fans want the University to make to retain him are inane.
Lea wants to be a head coach. It's not about the money; and if it were, no one in their right mind would spend what it would take to retain him.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Clark Lea informed Notre Dame’s defensive players on Monday he intends to coach at Notre Dame for the remainder of this season and "all I care about right now is the next three weeks.”</p>— Pete Sampson (@PeteSampson_) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeteSampson_/status/1338543701484851202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 14, 2020</a>
I almost reject the entire premise of this question, because how does one measure success at Vandy? An 8-4 regular season is wild success for Vandy... it's happened twice in the past 38 years. Both under James Franklin. Vandy has made 9 bowl games in their history. They've never won 10 games.
Notre Dame is not going to hire an 8-4 coach from Vandy and that is their *ceiling*... I get that the money and title at your alma mater is hard to turn down. I really do. But unless Clark Lea is even better as a HC than he is as a DC he likely just torpedoed his career. Derek Mason was in a similar situation with elite defenses at Stanford... one of the hottest up-and-coming coaches around... and took Vandy to 2 of the 9 bowl games in their history. And he's now unemployed, likely to be a retread in a worse DC situation than the one he left.
The best case scenario for Lea is that he pulls a Pat Fitzgerald, but the SEC is not the Big Ten West... and Vandy isn't even Northwestern. Which seems crazy to say about a Tier 4 football school, but it's true. It's arguably more of a dead end job than Kansas or Rutgers.
I agree with a lot of the above, but honest question. Do you think Lea is better than Franklin?