There's no indication the anonymous plaintiff is one of our football players. In fact, one could read the line I quoted above as a negative inference that he's not.
Lucci and I initially thought this might be a disgruntled member of the Frozen Five angling for a payday, but the Complaint indicates that the plaintiff enrolled in 2014, which rules all of them out.
So no, you are not allowed to speculate on which football player it might be.
got it.
the document said it was a guy who was a "freshman in 2014" (and so a soph this year)....could have sworn it said he was on an "academic" scholly specifically, which im noit sure im right here is what we call ALL our schollys--i.e. we refer to all our schollys as academic ones, right?
are you saying we can actually rule out that it cannot be a football or hoops player here? (hoping you are right!)