The lady who was dropping off the kids who she doesn't have custody of off at school and didn't hit the federal agent with a car because of expert IE tire angle analysis somehow gave the guy internal bleeding.
internal bleeding = a dramatic way to say a bruise lol
also, three things on that shooting:
1) Not self defense: you do not stop a car by shooting its driver. If anything, you cause the car to accelerate and veer wildly as the driver slumps and loses control of their foot. Maybe effective if the car's driving at you from like 30 feet away, but not from 2 feet away.
2) Not self defense: there may be room for argument with the first shot but the second and third shots are obviously taken from the side when the car had cleared the shooter and was clearly not a threat.
3) Not self defense: he put himself in the path of the vehicle which is, to put it mildly, not how you're supposed to approach cars as an LEO.
But, I agree. Dumb to have posters argue about this on the internet. Guy should get a trial and a jury can examine the evidence and convict or not convict him based on whether or not the government proves beyond a reasonable doubt all of the elements of the charged crimes.