- Messages
- 19,128
- Reaction score
- 11,077
I think what's really getting at me is frustration with how much the new trilogy sucks from the top down.
They rebooted the original trilogy and it never made sense to me. The Rebels beat an apparently unpopular Empire and then in Episode VII we went right back to Empire 2.0 having the Rebels 2.0 against the wall.
IMO they should have gone with a Lord of the Rings route and told a story about an evil on the rise. A rocky but workable peace post-Empire and a dark order of sorts that threatens what they've worked so hard to restore. Instead we have a trilogy that essentially makes the OG trilogy worthless, we're right back where we started. It's lazy.
This whole thing is unoriginal shit and not any more appreciable than the prequels. As a huuuuuuge Star Wars fan when I was younger this is probably the most frustrated with I've ever been with a movie franchise.
I mean, if you think about it though, the rebels didn't really *beat* the Empire the first time around... they killed the Emperor, creating enough chaos within the power structure to allow the temporary/small return of the Republic. It took some time, but the remnants of the Empire were simply reborn under new leadership after Snoke rose up to fill the power vacuum.
Seems like a pretty reasonable course of events over a 30+ year period. There was plenty of Empire tech, and plenty of powerful dudes still in the Empire, to get things turned around enough to bat the Republic back into submission (and ultimately destroy it totally).
The story you're looking for is told in the "Aftermath" novels. It's there, just not on film.