All Things SCOTUS

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,354
Reaction score
5,707
Fear mongering bs.
But, the bigger issue is how many of the undesirables would get healthcare. We've already determined that like ~2,500 trans kids getting medical treatment is enough to fuck over random non-trans kids because they'd rather just do punitive shit.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,698
Reaction score
5,996
But, the bigger issue is how many of the undesirables would get healthcare. We've already determined that like ~2,500 trans kids getting medical treatment is enough to fuck over random non-trans kids because they'd rather just do punitive shit.
What random non-trans kids are you referring to?

The one at SCOTUS today, from listening to the oral arguments, both parties conceded that hormone therapy would be available kids who needed to fix developmental issues. I could have misunderstood, at times they were getting in the weeds and i was working on other stuff at the time. Easy to miss things.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,354
Reaction score
5,707
What random non-trans kids are you referring to?

The one at SCOTUS today, from listening to the oral arguments, both parties conceded that hormone therapy would be available kids who needed to fix developmental issues. I could have misunderstood, at times they were getting in the weeds and i was working on other stuff at the time. Easy to miss things.
If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.

If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,583
Reaction score
20,035
The cass report has quietly refuted by pretty much everyone in the medical community.
If so, you would think the ACLU lawyer would have been on top of that and argued that point instead of agreeing with the Judge.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,583
Reaction score
20,035
If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.

If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.
I think there's a big difference in trans surgery and surgery to fix deformities.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
5,458
Buddy is an anesthesia guy over in St. Cloud, MN. Take a wild guess where a disproportionate number of his patients are from
What is… Canada. I have an Aunt that works in the office of a medical facility in ND and they do most of their advertising in Canada.
 
Last edited:
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
If so, you would think the ACLU lawyer would have been on top of that and argued that point instead of agreeing with the Judge.
He agreed on one small point and did refute the line of questioning. I think he wasn't prepared for that line of question. I know it's from slate so most of you will dismiss this article but it covers that whole line of questioning. I find it odd that alito decided to focus on that report instead of numerous ones from American medical associations. The lawyer also did point out that even with that report the UK and Europe hasn't taken the same drastic approach as the Tennessee bill. The argument he made and the same one I've been making is that like all medicine, it should be an individualized approach and it's not a one size fits all.

 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,583
Reaction score
20,035
He agreed on one small point and did refute the line of questioning. I think he wasn't prepared for that line of question. I know it's from slate so most of you will dismiss this article but it covers that whole line of questioning. I find it odd that alito decided to focus on that report instead of numerous ones from American medical associations. The lawyer also did point out that even with that report the UK and Europe hasn't taken the same drastic approach as the Tennessee bill. The argument he made and the same one I've been making is that like all medicine, it should be an individualized approach and it's not a one size fits all.

Seems to me that was a major point, but that's just my opinion.
 

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,518
Reaction score
3,263
If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.

If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.
What are gender affirming surgeries? Is that where you cut off penises and alter vaginas?
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
What are gender affirming surgeries? Is that where you cut off penises and alter vaginas?
Mastectomies, rhinoplastys, orchiectomy, and then bottom surgery. Vast majority of of gender affirming surgeries being performed are mastectomies for male kids suffering from gynecomastia.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
So you’re ok with intersex people deciding to have gender affirming surgeries?
These surgeries definitely shouldn't be done, plenty of evidence to suggest it negatively affects the child as they grow up. Doctors and parents deciding the child's gender only for the child to suffer later on in life.
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
4,524
These surgeries definitely shouldn't be done, plenty of evidence to suggest it negatively affects the child as they grow up. Doctors and parents deciding the child's gender only for the child to suffer later on in life.
I wonder how many botched circumcisions have contributed to this, as well.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,354
Reaction score
5,707
These surgeries definitely shouldn't be done, plenty of evidence to suggest it negatively affects the child as they grow up. Doctors and parents deciding the child's gender only for the child to suffer later on in life.

When it comes to an intersex kid I think they should be allowed to go through with it, because if the kid has the male parts has developed like a male and wants to remove ovaries or other parts that aren't in line with his wants he should be able to get this done.

It is absolutely an edge case, but that's the whole point - these things are happening at trivial rates.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
When it comes to an intersex kid I think they should be allowed to go through with it, because if the kid has the male parts has developed like a male and wants to remove ovaries or other parts that aren't in line with his wants he should be able to get this done.

It is absolutely an edge case, but that's the whole point - these things are happening at trivial rates.
I meant they shouldn't perform the surgeries on intersex infants. Waiting until the child is older and has a sense of who they are then go for it
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,583
Reaction score
20,035
The ACLU picked the wrong lawyer to argue. If any of the justices on the SC agree that a 2 year old knows if they are trans, they should be removed.

 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,583
Reaction score
20,035
Mastectomies, rhinoplastys, orchiectomy, and then bottom surgery. Vast majority of of gender affirming surgeries being performed are mastectomies for male kids suffering from gynecomastia.
I don't know, but to me that is a deformity and not gender affirming. Gender affirming surgery is when you're having surgery to switch teams.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
I don't know, but to me that is a deformity and not gender affirming. Gender affirming surgery is when you're having surgery to switch teams.
It's a benign issue that typically goes away with time. The only reason male children would need to have surgery is to feel better about your body. That's the definition of gender affirming surgery
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,722
Soto and Brown would support Jurassic assignment surgeries for 5 year olds identifying as dinosaurs.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,698
Reaction score
5,996
If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.

If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.
I don't believe intersex anomalies are impacted by the law in question. I could be wrong though. Haven't done a deep dive, wouldn't be shocked either way. Legislation is not easy to draft.
 
Top