NorthDakota
Grandson of Loomis
- Messages
- 15,696
- Reaction score
- 5,996
Enjoy the wait times and substandard careAll our healthcare should be paid by the government. Save us all a shit ton of money.
Enjoy the wait times and substandard careAll our healthcare should be paid by the government. Save us all a shit ton of money.
Fear mongering bs.Enjoy the wait times and substandard care
But, the bigger issue is how many of the undesirables would get healthcare. We've already determined that like ~2,500 trans kids getting medical treatment is enough to fuck over random non-trans kids because they'd rather just do punitive shit.Fear mongering bs.
Buddy is an anesthesia guy over in St. Cloud, MN. Take a wild guess where a disproportionate number of his patients are fromFear mongering bs.
What random non-trans kids are you referring to?But, the bigger issue is how many of the undesirables would get healthcare. We've already determined that like ~2,500 trans kids getting medical treatment is enough to fuck over random non-trans kids because they'd rather just do punitive shit.
If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.What random non-trans kids are you referring to?
The one at SCOTUS today, from listening to the oral arguments, both parties conceded that hormone therapy would be available kids who needed to fix developmental issues. I could have misunderstood, at times they were getting in the weeds and i was working on other stuff at the time. Easy to miss things.
If so, you would think the ACLU lawyer would have been on top of that and argued that point instead of agreeing with the Judge.The cass report has quietly refuted by pretty much everyone in the medical community.
I think there's a big difference in trans surgery and surgery to fix deformities.If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.
If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.
I think there's a big difference in trans surgery and surgery to fix deformities.
Fear mongering bs.
What is… Canada. I have an Aunt that works in the office of a medical facility in ND and they do most of their advertising in Canada.Buddy is an anesthesia guy over in St. Cloud, MN. Take a wild guess where a disproportionate number of his patients are from
What do you do with an intersex person?I think there's a big difference in trans surgery and surgery to fix deformities.
He agreed on one small point and did refute the line of questioning. I think he wasn't prepared for that line of question. I know it's from slate so most of you will dismiss this article but it covers that whole line of questioning. I find it odd that alito decided to focus on that report instead of numerous ones from American medical associations. The lawyer also did point out that even with that report the UK and Europe hasn't taken the same drastic approach as the Tennessee bill. The argument he made and the same one I've been making is that like all medicine, it should be an individualized approach and it's not a one size fits all.If so, you would think the ACLU lawyer would have been on top of that and argued that point instead of agreeing with the Judge.
Deformity IMO.What do you do with an intersex person?
Seems to me that was a major point, but that's just my opinion.He agreed on one small point and did refute the line of questioning. I think he wasn't prepared for that line of question. I know it's from slate so most of you will dismiss this article but it covers that whole line of questioning. I find it odd that alito decided to focus on that report instead of numerous ones from American medical associations. The lawyer also did point out that even with that report the UK and Europe hasn't taken the same drastic approach as the Tennessee bill. The argument he made and the same one I've been making is that like all medicine, it should be an individualized approach and it's not a one size fits all.
![]()
Brett Kavanaugh Is Using the Logic of Dobbs to Pursue a Dangerous New Agenda
Skrmetti involves bans on gender-affirming care for trans children.slate.com
So you’re ok with intersex people deciding to have gender affirming surgeries?Deformity IMO.
What are gender affirming surgeries? Is that where you cut off penises and alter vaginas?If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.
If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.
That’s probably the rarest form of it, but yeah it’s included in there.What are gender affirming surgeries? Is that where you cut off penises and alter vaginas?
Mastectomies, rhinoplastys, orchiectomy, and then bottom surgery. Vast majority of of gender affirming surgeries being performed are mastectomies for male kids suffering from gynecomastia.What are gender affirming surgeries? Is that where you cut off penises and alter vaginas?
These surgeries definitely shouldn't be done, plenty of evidence to suggest it negatively affects the child as they grow up. Doctors and parents deciding the child's gender only for the child to suffer later on in life.So you’re ok with intersex people deciding to have gender affirming surgeries?
I wonder how many botched circumcisions have contributed to this, as well.These surgeries definitely shouldn't be done, plenty of evidence to suggest it negatively affects the child as they grow up. Doctors and parents deciding the child's gender only for the child to suffer later on in life.
These surgeries definitely shouldn't be done, plenty of evidence to suggest it negatively affects the child as they grow up. Doctors and parents deciding the child's gender only for the child to suffer later on in life.
I meant they shouldn't perform the surgeries on intersex infants. Waiting until the child is older and has a sense of who they are then go for itWhen it comes to an intersex kid I think they should be allowed to go through with it, because if the kid has the male parts has developed like a male and wants to remove ovaries or other parts that aren't in line with his wants he should be able to get this done.
It is absolutely an edge case, but that's the whole point - these things are happening at trivial rates.
I wonder how many botched circumcisions have contributed to this, as well.
I don't know, but to me that is a deformity and not gender affirming. Gender affirming surgery is when you're having surgery to switch teams.Mastectomies, rhinoplastys, orchiectomy, and then bottom surgery. Vast majority of of gender affirming surgeries being performed are mastectomies for male kids suffering from gynecomastia.
It's a benign issue that typically goes away with time. The only reason male children would need to have surgery is to feel better about your body. That's the definition of gender affirming surgeryI don't know, but to me that is a deformity and not gender affirming. Gender affirming surgery is when you're having surgery to switch teams.
We'll disagree on that.It's a benign issue that typically goes away with time. The only reason male children would need to have surgery is to feel better about your body. That's the definition of gender affirming surgery
We'll disagree on that.
I don't believe intersex anomalies are impacted by the law in question. I could be wrong though. Haven't done a deep dive, wouldn't be shocked either way. Legislation is not easy to draft.If you're cracking down on gender affirming surgeries you're going to be impacting non-trans kids at much higher rates. Inter-sex for example is more common than being trans. You'll have kids that have lived their whole lives as a girl but because they have testesicles that didn't drop and they want to get them taken out so they can develop more traditionally. They have all the parts, they want to be a girl but because some terminally online freaks want to stop some random trans kids they'll have a much much tougher time getting that treatment. You can be the most anti-trans person out there and STILL think this is a horrible idea because the impacts go further.
If you're making something taboo you'll have people drop offering the treatment because it's not worth the liability to take it on.