ulukinatme
Carr for QB 2025!
- Messages
- 31,516
- Reaction score
- 17,382
The comments are wild, so many supposed alumni claim they're shocked and ashamed of the university. Where did they think they were going to school for 4 years, a Baptist institution?
Hes not wrong though.Did Thomas really say the court should reconsider Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell?? The rulings that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.
That seems uhhhhh less than ideal.
Almost feels cliche to be this much of a backwards hick combined with your username and profile pic.Hes not wrong though.
That's right, GATTACA. Everyone who disagrees with you is a backwards hick. Including the billions of Christians,, Muslims and practicing jews throughout the world as well as most nations.Almost feels cliche to be this much of a backwards hick combined with your username and profile pic.
At least we've found some common ground.
That's right, GATTACA. Everyone who disagrees with you is a backwards hick. Including the billions of Christians,, Muslims and practicing jews throughout the world as well as most nations.
It's what woke people do when you disagree with them.Dang!! Toronto and Gattaca coming out swinging with 3rd grade level insults....
Don't compare gay people marrying to someone marrying a dog and you won't get chirped...pretty easy concept. Personally, I wouldn't make a statement like that if I resembled Sloth from the Goonies.Dang!! Toronto and Gattaca coming out swinging with 3rd grade level insults....
TIL it's woke to think people should have access to contraception lol.It's what woke people do when you disagree with them.
Eh, I just have a list of ignored users that grows basically bc this forum,… if it gets to base level insults it just benefits everyone to walk away and ignore. Lord knows I’ve had a few poor moments too over the years,… if you don’t like hearing it from someone just ignore them. It’s a cfb message board, no one is really being constructive in these threadsDang!! Toronto and Gattaca coming out swinging with 3rd grade level insults....
Contraception is a must imo at this point,… easy and cheap.TIL it's woke to think people should have access to contraception lol.
This is my one stop shop for ND Football news and my outlet for politics so I dont offend family and friends on social media or to their face. I just like to pretend I am arguiing politics with people of certain level but I am losing faith pretty quickly.Eh, I just have a list of ignored users that grows basically bc this forum,… if it gets to base level insults it just benefits everyone to walk away and ignore. Lord knows I’ve had a few poor moments too over the years,… if you don’t like hearing it from someone just ignore them. It’s a cfb message board, no one is really being constructive in these threads
100!!Contraception is a must imo at this point,… east and cheap.
Pretty much the same hereThis is my one stop shop for ND Football news and my outlet for politics so I dont offend family and friends on social media or to their face. I just like to pretend I am arguiing politics with people of certain level but I am losing faith pretty quickly.
Whats Dante Moore doing.....
Stop. You know exactly what I was doing. And it wasn't comparing guys to beastiity.Don't compare gay people marrying to someone marrying a dog and you won't get chirped...pretty easy concept. Personally, I wouldn't make a statement like that if I resembled Sloth from the Goonies.
Ok, Sloth.Stop. You know exactly what I was doing. And it wasn't comparing guys to beastiity.
It was listing marriages that are not constitutional rights in order of reasonable plausibility.
The contraception part I disagree with.TIL it's woke to think people should have access to contraception lol.
"Same sex marriage is no more a constitutional right than biggamy or any other plural type marriage, marrying a family member or marrying a dog for that matter"Stop. You know exactly what I was doing. And it wasn't comparing guys to beastiity.
It was listing marriages that are not constitutional rights in order of reasonable plausibility.
"Same sex marriage is no more a constitutional right than biggamy or any other plural type marriage, marrying a family member or marrying a dog for that matter"
Well, "no more" kind of hints at the thought they all hold the same place in your opinion. Don't back down, own your opinion, you've got support from others.
What?They don't hold the same place to me anymore than a tractor trailer, truck, car or skateboard hold to me. But they other than they are transportation.
We are talking about what is constitutionally protected as it relates to holy matrimony.
Does this mean that you are open to state recognition of plural marriages?
I have to get back to work but I will respond later. I'm sorry, TG. I can be clumsy at times when drawing examples. I'm sorry if I offended you and honestly didn't mean to imply that I consider those two equal.What?
Not sure what polygamy has to do with two consenting adults getting married? I don't consider them to be equal by any stretch. I consider marriage to be marriage, so between two consenting adults whether it's straight or gay that's ok to me.
If you were given the choice of allowing gay marriage in your state, would you say yay or nay?
What?
Not sure what polygamy has to do with two consenting adults getting married? I don't consider them to be equal by any stretch. I consider marriage to be marriage, so between two consenting adults whether it's straight or gay that's ok to me.
If you were given the choice of allowing gay marriage in your state, would you say yay or nay?
How does polygamy and gay marriage relate? Do you genuinely believe they are the same? Surely, you disagree with Sloth's stance that gay marriage should be overturned, right?I am geniunely curious what your beef with polygamy is? If its above love and we cannot control who we love and if all adults are consenting why get in their way? It does not affect you, right? I am seriously baffled you or anyone on that side of the isle would be against it. It meets all the criteria of "it does not affect me so I dont give a shit" value system of the left.
How does polygamy and gay marriage relate? Do you genuinely believe they are the same? Surely, you disagree with Sloth's stance that gay marriage should be overturned, right?
When does “being the enemy” equate to “being oppressed”?It's certainly tough to be any of those four, I couldn't imagine being all four....most oppressed group for sure
They’re the same as much as they are different.How does polygamy and gay marriage relate? Do you genuinely believe they are the same? Surely, you disagree with Sloth's stance that gay marriage should be overturned, right?
I was going to respond to your questions but I see that you're still personally insulting me. I won't do the same. We can disagree without being disagreeable and treat each other with dignity and respect.What?
Not sure what polygamy has to do with two consenting adults getting married? I don't consider them to be by any stretch. I consider marriage to be marriage, so between two consenting adults whether it's straight or gay that's ok to me.
If you were given the choice of allowing gay marriage in your state, would you say yay or nay?
What? You think being a straight white guy who's conservative is the enemy? This has to have italics, because if true that is quite a victim complex.When does “being the enemy” equate to “being oppressed”?
These are words, in a sentence, written by you. What does this statement mean? Do you agree with the previous posters that gay marriage should be revisited and overruled?They’re the same as much as they are different.
Come on Bishop, he said that gay marriage should be revisited. That is a fucking abhorrent take to have. I'm sorry if it rocks the proverbial boat, but that is a braindead take to have and quite honestly slightly shocking that you and #1 haven't called out that position. I expected it from the other two but not you guys.Come on Toronto, don't argue in bad faith. You know his point is that The Constitution doesn't protect any of them. Focusing on the wording instead of the point is a cheap diversionary tactic to avoid serious discussion of a point or idea that one doesn't agree with.