'25 NV WR Derek Meadows (Alabama Verbal)

I

Irish5Saint

Well-known member
Messages
569
Reaction score
1,111
forkbeard3777 said:
I’m definitely a LSU / SEC guy (LSU undergrad, Vandy Grad - Owen School
of Management) now living in Houston.

Always liked Notre Dame and even made my first game / trip to South Bend last year (Pittsburgh and then Indianapolis the next day for Saints - Colts). I’m currently trying to free up my plans for Labor Day to go to College Station and root on ND vs. A&M.

I just like to poke fun here and there about BK, which some posters are sensitive about. That said, admittedly, I’m not a huge fan of BK. He’s a high floor, low ceiling kinda guy (which is why I threw in the Milos gif).
Click to expand...

forkbeard3777 said:
With our defense, who we lost (Daniels, Nabers, Thomas Jr) and that schedule (USC, @ South Carolina, UCLA, Ole Miss, @ Arky, @ A&M, Alabama, @ Florida, OU), 9-3 is the best case scenario. I’m sure we’ll get the same old excuses, however.
Click to expand...

You’re the first LSU fan I’ve seen that isn’t arrogant and cocky from the past few years.
 
P

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
GrangerIrish24 said:
Which would still be Kelly’s fault
Click to expand...
I would have agreed if the portal wasn’t around then.

It shouldn’t have taken 3 years to hit the portal at wr like we did for this upcoming year.

This year our top wr might be Collins and 3 of our top 6 or 7 wrs will be from the portal.

It was Kelly’s fault we didn’t have a 21 qb, so he gets coan and we go 11-1. 22 and 23 had obvious holes at wr and qb, only after 8-4 did we get a portal qb, and never pushed hard for wrs until we couldn’t get open vs any good teams in 23.
 
DONTH8

DONTH8

Definitely not Coach BD
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
1,667
dublinirish said:
O Malley on II podcast made it seem that ND making freshman football players stay in dorms was majorly off-putting to him
Click to expand...
Thats unfortunate. I didnt go to ND so I don't know how the dorm situation is, but my father went to grad school there. He said one of the best things about ND athletes was the fact that they were 'forced' to be around students and lived similar lives to the other students on campus. Made them approachable, relatable, and very respectful to everyone on campus. They saw everyone as peers, rather than just fans.

If this is true, it's too bad Meadows didn't see value in gaining that type of life experience. Or any freshman coming to school for that matter.
 
A

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,455
Reaction score
8,536
ND doesn't make them live in dorms with the regular folk. Only requires them to have a room in a ND dorm. If an athlete wants to live off campus, they have to pay for those costs on their own. They don't get a room allowance.

In the age of NIL, I'm guessing most football players will choose to live off campus quite early on.

What's the point is of having a policy that (in theory) requires them to live on campus so that those athlete's become more well rounded students, if they just choose to live off campus in small groups of 2 or 4? I understand the history of the policy and the purpose behind it. But if the end result is our athlete's are living off campus anyhow, then I would think something should change.

I would think it would be better for our players to live in athletic dorms where there is a greater sense of community than to live in small groups in off campus housing.
 
Luckylucci

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,770
Reaction score
10,153
Playing on ESPN right now in a huge matchup between Gorman and St. Thomas Aquinas (FL).

Big play TD just a moment ago.
 
dublinirish

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,335
Reaction score
13,094
Great game tbf and STA is driving to tie it up late


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
T Town Tommy

T Town Tommy

Alabama Bag Man
Messages
6,278
Reaction score
2,768
ab2cmiller said:
ND doesn't make them live in dorms with the regular folk. Only requires them to have a room in a ND dorm. If an athlete wants to live off campus, they have to pay for those costs on their own. They don't get a room allowance.

In the age of NIL, I'm guessing most football players will choose to live off campus quite early on.

What's the point is of having a policy that (in theory) requires them to live on campus so that those athlete's become more well rounded students, if they just choose to live off campus in small groups of 2 or 4? I understand the history of the policy and the purpose behind it. But if the end result is our athlete's are living off campus anyhow, then I would think something should change.

I would think it would be better for our players to live in athletic dorms where there is a greater sense of community than to live in small groups in off campus housing.
Click to expand...
At one point, didn't the NCAA crack down on athletic only dorms and housing citing it as an unfair benefit because some schools had great housing while others may have not even had them? That was years and years ago so it may have changed. I don't know.
 
Pops Freshenmeyer

Pops Freshenmeyer

Well-known member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
2,457
T Town Tommy said:
At one point, didn't the NCAA crack down on athletic only dorms and housing citing it as an unfair benefit because some schools had great housing while others may have not even had them? That was years and years ago so it may have changed. I don't know.
Click to expand...
There’s a rule against them but it’s easily circumvented by letting some donors’ kids live there too. E.g.: the University of Kentucky’s Wildcat Lodge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top