Armyirish47
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,441
- Reaction score
- 1,088
So it’s Avery, Care reclassification, or zero for 2023? Did I miss anything
Yeah, an early signing period, another signing period, and a transfer portal window.
So it’s Avery, Care reclassification, or zero for 2023? Did I miss anything
Nope.Those are as fake as can be.
Most likely it's going to be a transferSo what percent chance are we looking at of not getting a '23 QB at all? Around 95%?
So what percent chance are we looking at of not getting a '23 QB at all? Around 95%?
I'd rather take 2 grad transfers, even if one of them is a 1 year placeholder from an Ivy League school over a kid in the 2023 class that doesn't have all that high of an upside. We already have 1 clipboard holder (RP3) who will be here for multiple years. We can't afford to "waste" another scholarship for multiple years on another.Most likely it's going to be a transfer
Nice. If we have a 50% chance of getting someone, must be pretty good odds.50%. It either happens or it doesn't.
Only 10% chance of that…..Nice. If we have a 50% chance of getting someone, must be pretty good odds.
Great. Our QB recruiting has entered Schrodinger's box territory.50%. It either happens or it doesn't.
Aldi’s and Salma Hayeks tits.So it’s Avery, Care reclassification, or zero for 2023? Did I miss anything
Fixed for those who question our goddess and the authenticity of her lady lumpsMy heterosexuality is as fake as can be.
We need both. Unlikely we are getting a top 5 qb in the 23 class so chances they start next season are slim. We need someone that will compete for the starting job next year with Buchner and PyneMost likely it's going to be a transfer
FIFYWe need both. Unlikely we are getting a top 5 qb in the 23 class so chances they start next season are slim. We need someone that WONT HAVE TO compete for the starting job next year with Buchner and Pyne
That’s a grad transferFIFY
99%So what percent chance are we looking at of not getting a '23 QB at all? Around 95%?
Great. Our QB recruiting has entered Schrodinger's box territory.
Great. Our QB recruiting has entered Schrodinger's box territory.
32.479324%So what percent chance are we looking at of not getting a '23 QB at all? Around 95%?
Jack Swarbrick seriously needs to answer for why he bent over backwards to keep Rees BEFORE he even knew who the next HC was going to be.It's just so mind blowing that our QB evaluating/recruiting/development has been so bad. How you can't stop and look at this and say "something isn't right here" is just crazy. It's almost as if it were intentional.
At least I have chicken.32.33 repeating of course.
Can we keep this thread on Johnson and but all the Rees bashing on his threadJack Swarbrick seriously needs to answer for why he bent over backwards to keep Rees BEFORE he even knew who the next HC was going to be.
That’s assuming we all stick to the plan.32.33 repeating of course.
10% chance of a 50% makes it a net 5% chance. Trf. portal, here we come!Only 10% chance of that…..
He's planning the Minnesota game in Charlotte, NC. He's got no time for you.Jack Swarbrick seriously needs to answer for why he bent over backwards to keep Rees BEFORE he even knew who the next HC was going to be.
Jack Swarbrick seriously needs to answer for why he bent over backwards to keep Rees BEFORE he even knew who the next HC was going to be.
I pretty much agree with what you're saying here as for DMC I also agree he's not an OC type but I think his skill set is that he's got the chops to be a HC.No offense to the guy, but the single worst hire of the off-season was Parker, and it isn’t close. And this directly relates to Rees.
Stuckey is not ready or even we don’t know interested in play calling OC type responsibilities. DMC is not a in the booth play caller type IMO. Neither is Hiestand.
So the only offensive staff spot that offers a chance to “check” Rees is the TEs coach. And Freeman hired his friend that I’m still not too sure Rees was too fond of. He doesn’t trust/want him next to him in the booth it seems. The booth is Rees and GAs. Who knows how that extends to prep, other things. McNulty was Rees’ check with me last year in the booth.
I think we miss McNulty a fair bit. On the plus side, BC's offense is terrible so maybe there'll be an opportunity to bring him back. (As an analyst not OC!)No offense to the guy, but the single most flawed hire of the off-season was Parker, and it isn’t close. And this directly relates to Rees.
Stuckey is not ready or even we don’t know interested in play calling OC type responsibilities. DMC is not a in the booth play caller type IMO. Neither is Hiestand.
So the only offensive staff spot that offers a chance to “check” Rees is the TEs coach. And Freeman hired his friend that I’m still not too sure Rees was too fond of. He doesn’t trust/want him next to him in the booth it seems. The booth is Rees and GAs. Who knows how that extends to prep, other things. McNulty was Rees’ check with me last year in the booth.