Jimmy3Putt
KooL
- Messages
- 6,331
- Reaction score
- 7,622
That missed holdings called cost us a championship. That was way worse.The phantom one second is 50x worse imo
More painful for us ND fans, but for the integrity of the sport last night was way way worse. When people are comparing something to WWF and the 72 Olympics, its an all timerThat missed holdings called cost us a championship. That was way worse.
There is negative integrity in the sport as far as I’m concerned. Evidence: Dec. 7, 2025 and there’s no reason to believe anything’s changed or will change any time soon.More painful for us ND fans, but for the integrity of the sport last night was way way worse. When people are comparing something to WWF and the 72 Olympics, its an all timer
I also thought Hoover was bloody good.This is your best troll work yet.
A pool of officials should be hired and maintained via negotiated salaries and the officials should be circulated as evenly as possible between conferences and regions as money allows.
Grading should be standardized and the bottom 10% should have 1 year to improve. If they are bottom 10% for two consecutive years, they should be allowed to pursue other opportunities and the highest scoring refs from whatever feeder system is used, should be called up.
Reviews should be handled by centralized staff. It should be uniform and the public should be given enough access to trust the system.
Refs should be monitored like they work for the CIA: social monitoring, bank monitoring, phone records, etc. This is the only way to convince me that we've done all we could to remove bias/influence from the process.
Anyone in a financial regulated market is monitored constantly, I know many on here have the same disclosure requirements I have (stock trading bans, lending limits, compliance clearinghouses etc.) with all the Kalshi stuff it would be criminal to not have the same framework for anyone with material influence on CFB.A pool of officials should be hired and maintained via negotiated salaries and the officials should be circulated as evenly as possible between conferences and regions as money allows.
Grading should be standardized and the bottom 10% should have 1 year to improve. If they are bottom 10% for two consecutive years, they should be allowed to pursue other opportunities and the highest scoring refs from whatever feeder system is used, should be called up.
Reviews should be handled by centralized staff. It should be uniform and the public should be given enough access to trust the system.
Refs should be monitored like they work for the CIA: social monitoring, bank monitoring, phone records, etc. This is the only way to convince me that we've done all we could to remove bias/influence from the process.
100%, LSU was at a whole other level of strength & especially Speed!!I can’t get over how dominant LSU looked/how absolutely awful Clemson looks. Weird things happen on week one, but I don’t think you can think of LSU but anything but a psycho contender until proven otherwise. Wild.
Honestly, they kinda do.Truly. This is getting insane now. The feds need to step in
It was less LSU looking good and more Clemson looking awful.I can’t get over how dominant LSU looked/how absolutely awful Clemson looks. Weird things happen on week one, but I don’t think you can think of LSU but anything but a psycho contender until proven otherwise. Wild.
Anyone looks good when they are completely unblockedIt was less LSU looking good and more Clemson looking awful.
I mean, Clemson was "they aren't making a bowl game" levels of awful. I frankly can see them losing to Georgia Southern next week, they're THAT bad.
Dabo has tanked with NIL more than the SEC has. It’s astonishing.I can’t get over how dominant LSU looked/how absolutely awful Clemson looks. Weird things happen on week one, but I don’t think you can think of LSU but anything but a psycho contender until proven otherwise. Wild.
Who people think Sellers is:
Also on UM's first Hail Mary they blatantly held the nose tackle and there should have been a 10 second run off.
The ball was dead when it crossed the back of the endzone in the air. It does not matter if a player was in or oob when he jumped.
NCAA Rule 4 - Ball in Play, Dead Ball, Out of Bounds - sportscollaboration If a live ball not in player possession crosses a boundary line and then is declared out of bounds, it is out of bounds at the crossing point.
I am curious about that too. Does 'live ball' include a pass? The refs never declare a ball dead when it crosses out of bounds, they only look at where the foot of the catcher comes down. Perhaps a pass is 'oob' when it crosses the line but it is not dead until an oob player touches it.I don't think that rule is talking temporal/clock, that rule is talking about location for the spot.
How much money would retirement cost him contractually? I'll look it up. It would be decent of him to at least negotiate with the school to get paid out a portion.Dabo may resign mid season. His heart isn't in it. He's bitter and frustrated and this team is awful. They may b3 2-4 by mid season.
I wonder who is pulling the strings that made the WMU president and coach go stage a press conference to carry the water for the big 10 and Michigan. Could be the conference, could be the Michigan school system. Either way, no chance in hell they just decided to do this
IT seemed to me that Cal was better than UCLA for about 5 of every 6 plays. The Golden Bears' problem was that #6 was a turnover.I don't want to hear shit about Cal for the rest of the year, either.
They've been getting some darling run for their "improvements" but UCLA beat their ass.
Oh, same state, same region, same history of buy games. The MAC knows they exist as a vassal to the BUG.I wonder who is pulling the strings that made the WMU president and coach go stage a press conference to carry the water for the big 10 and Michigan. Could be the conference, could be the Michigan school system. Either way, no chance in hell they just decided to do this