2024 College Football Playoffs

NDPhilly

Philly Torqued
Messages
16,445
Reaction score
16,737
Oregon is going to be back, Phil Knight's $$$ has ensured that they're recruiting / getting transfers at an elite level.
 

bumpdaddy

Well-known member
Messages
431
Reaction score
1,020
After I saw the play and heard the rules analyst say, "I'd expect them to call this targeting", I was convinced. Not sure why they didn't call it except the defender didn't launch crown of the helmet into the receiver but I thought a defenseless player with impact to the head/neck area was an auto-target.

They've changed the rules so much, I could be incorrect.
No, you are correct. The specific rule for a defenseless player is a hit to the head or neck area with a helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder with at least one indicator of targeting. There are several indicators but this one definitely applies to the play in question:
  • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
What's more, the rule states, "when in question, it is a foul," which means if the refs look at the replay and it looks like there is at least one indicator of targeting but they aren't sure they must call targeting. In order for it to not be targeting it must be clear there are no indicators of targeting. The refs definitely blew it on this call.

Here's an article that goes over this controversy.
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
4,527
No, you are correct. The specific rule for a defenseless player is a hit to the head or neck area with a helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder with at least one indicator of targeting. There are several indicators but this one definitely applies to the play in question:
  • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
What's more, the rule states, "when in question, it is a foul," which means if the refs look at the replay and it looks like there is at least one indicator of targeting but they aren't sure they must call targeting. In order for it to not be targeting it must be clear there are no indicators of targeting. The refs definitely blew it on this call.

Here's an article that goes over this controversy.
The failure to call an obvious targeting totally changed the outcome of the game. We would be absolutely furious if it happened to Notre Dame.
 

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
They were supposed to call that ASU lineman for pulling the rb into the end zone. You can push but not pull. I think that’s the rule still. Good game overall. ASU had their chances.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,120
Reaction score
27,376
I still think Lanning leaves sooner than people now think. It’s not sustainable to build a D from the portal and he knows it. You can pay HS kids but some just won’t want to go to Oregon in the end. Unless Phil Knight moves Oregon to not the Pacific Northwest, they will have flaws.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,489
Reaction score
14,229
I still think Lanning leaves sooner than people now think. It’s not sustainable to build a D from the portal and he knows it. You can pay HS kids but some just won’t want to go to Oregon in the end. Unless Phil Knight moves Oregon to not the Pacific Northwest, they will have flaws.
I know it is very, very early but we all know that they are very, very irrational in Tuscaloosa. That being said, if DeBoer churns out a couple more 9-4 seasons, they'll pony up and try to get Lanning again, we would assume.

Oregon has Lanning in the $8M a year range. Drinkwitz is making more than him at Mizzou. The money could definitely factor, but you have to assume Oregon is providing him with plenty of perks via Uncle Phil.

The SEC is still going to recruit the best high school talent, but I think you are correct when you look at the current landscape. It's going to be easier to build an offense quickly via the Portal vs a defense. The Pacific Northwest location still is what it is, even will all of the Shoe Dog money pouring into the program.
 

Terry Jillery

Well-known member
Messages
1,781
Reaction score
2,709
I love Christian Gray and think he’s going to come into his own next year or two and be really good but I imagine Ohio State having their way with him.
 

Katzenboyer

Well-known member
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
3,186
I still think Lanning leaves sooner than people now think. It’s not sustainable to build a D from the portal and he knows it. You can pay HS kids but some just won’t want to go to Oregon in the end. Unless Phil Knight moves Oregon to not the Pacific Northwest, they will have flaws.

I think what Oregon is building is sustainable. They're recruiting at a high level, and Chip Kelly and Mario Cristobal showed you can win/recruit at the school and win a ton of games doing it.

The key is retaining Lanning. I'm not sure if he would move on to another college job, but I definitely think the NFL will come calling at some point.
 

Katzenboyer

Well-known member
Messages
1,925
Reaction score
3,186
I love Christian Gray and think he’s going to come into his own next year or two and be really good but I imagine Ohio State having their way with him.

They'll probably get theirs. But the key to beating OSU is punching them in the mouth and holding the ball for 40+ minutes.

I don't think the Irish will be favored if they end in the national championship against the Buckeyes, but ND is absolutely equipped to beat them if they do.
 

OhioIrish

Well-known member
Messages
469
Reaction score
494
They'll probably get theirs. But the key to beating OSU is punching them in the mouth and holding the ball for 40+ minutes.

I don't think the Irish will be favored if they end in the national championship against the Buckeyes, but ND is absolutely equipped to beat them if they do.
I think OSU would deservedly be favored by a touchdown against ND, but this OSU team is like every OSU team under Ryan Day — Dow Joneser. Who knows what they will look like in three weeks.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,109
Reaction score
5,460
I've also read that any changes have to be unanimously voted for, so that would require ND, ACC, B12, and whoever else non SEC/B1G to vote against giving four byes.
This bodes well for Notre Dame. Notre Dame may not get a top 4 slot and sure one less game wouldn’t hurt but I’d rather be 5 than 4 at this point. My only worry two more games basically puts them at almost an NFL schedule. Hope they don’t weather down in game 3 and 4.
 

IrishWayDomer

Banned
Messages
669
Reaction score
1,273
I know someone mentioned this somewhere on IE yesterday, but man, I forgot the fact that although ND has made $14 million in CFP victory $, ND gets to keep all of it of course as an Independent (vs. conferences splitting it). More $, more $, more $! Notre Dame's $14 Million Playoff Haul Has Everyone Saying the Same Thing
Someone broke this down on ISD, but with the revenue difference between NBC and Big 10, ND would have to win the title each year to break even. Big 10 has collected $28M so far for playoffs, and splitting it goes both ways. Even if you miss the playoffs you're getting millions. It's a bit more make or break for ND.
 

InKellyWeTrust

Well-known member
Messages
2,955
Reaction score
3,387
Someone broke this down on ISD, but with the revenue difference between NBC and Big 10, ND would have to win the title each year to break even. Big 10 has collected $28M so far for playoffs, and splitting it goes both ways. Even if you miss the playoffs you're getting millions. It's a bit more make or break for ND.
If ND wins a title I guarantee none of that will matter. Their value instantly increases with a title and negotiating another contract with NBC or whoever will see those returns.
 

Irish5Saint

Well-known member
Messages
569
Reaction score
1,111
Someone broke this down on ISD, but with the revenue difference between NBC and Big 10, ND would have to win the title each year to break even. Big 10 has collected $28M so far for playoffs, and splitting it goes both ways. Even if you miss the playoffs you're getting millions. It's a bit more make or break for ND.
Does that account for the $17 million they get from the ACC for a partial payout?
 
Top