| COMPLETIONS | ATTEMPTS | CMP% | YDS | TDS | INTS | RUSHING YDS | RUSHING TDS |
| Buchner | 21 | 35 | 60% | 298 | 3 | 3 | 336 | 3 |
| Pyne | 17 | 33 | 52% | 236 | 2 | 0 | -2 | 0 |
I think Pyne gets a little too much credit for his performance against Wisconsin, and some people may also be worrying too much about Buchner's accuracy and experience compared to Pyne.
Pyne deserves a ton of credit for his efficiency against the Badgers, and also for not totally imploding against UC's defense (even with a terrible completion %).
But the raw stats say that Buchner is more accurate and more likely to score TD's (and more likely to throw an INT, but I'd bet the analytics say the increased completion %, yardage, and rushing add-ons are worth it in a big way).
And another thing to consider is that Pyne got thrown to the fire for two semi-extended auditions, while Buchner got opportunities in a more sporadic way. His only extended audition was VT, and that was a terrible game script he was fighting (like Pyne against UC). I have high hopes for Buchner when he gets a chance to take control and find a rhythm, rather than running the telegraphed 'RPO or Split-Back Read' offense. I'm excited to see him unleashed like he was against VT, but with the benefit of a friendlier environment and game script... It's a shame that won't be in week one though lol.