B
Bogtrotter07
Guest
No, he didn't. He graded out horribly by people who do that sort of thing, and got supplanted by Martini (another true frosh who had gotten effectively zero practice reps at the position before Schmidt went down) because of his bad play. Him being named an "all-american" by a few ignorant people doesn't change that.
The problem Morgan had was not with a lack of athletic ability, or a lack of brains. It was with a lack of discipline. He was a loose cannon; was he going to play assignment correct; or just take off after the ball, lucky dog style? All this speculation about Morgan not being smart, or not being able to get it is just that speculation. And it happens to be unfounded. It was always about executing the assignment. That is why there was such an absence of him before and after his shot when Schmidt was injured. Now that Morgan realizes that he won't play, unless he plays the way that the coaches want, he has a new attitude. I believe there is more than just a glimmer of hope that he will play beastly, and he will show some real leadership.
That's effectively the same lineup as last year, minus a reliable veteran DE and subbing a great/versatile DT for one that is coming off injury and has never shown to be as good. So how is that better? I agree that the wrinkle that could lead to better production would be getting a more reliable lineup for passing downs that features maybe Rochelle slid inside + Jones, and Hayes (who is a mystery bag with potential) and Trumbetti on the outside.
You cannot compare Jarron Jones to Sheldon Day in any way. One is a 1tech the other a three. Jarron Jones proved what he had the season before last, when he wasn't hurt. (That is the only thing that concerns me about Jarron.) Twice broadcasters noted that he was pushing the blocker attempting to take him on back into the ball carrier. Twice I heard his play described as demoralizing to the opponent. I am not sure I have ever heard that term used before. And, the big thing last year's defense missed, and this years defense may have, is JJ collapsing pockets at will. He is capable of it, that is why a healthy JJ is irreplaceable for this team!
I don't really know what this means. He was a multi-year starter, and is an NFL caliber player that made a number of VERY big, tone-setting plays. Extremely athletic and physical. We don't know if Drue Tranquill has any ability to stay healthy. Same for Sebastian. So it's clearly a drop off in reliability, production, and experience. I've always been VERY high on Tranquill but you simply can't count on him right now.
The KeiVarae of last year, with the rust and the season long injuries, was not the KR of his potential. He was far short of it. Watch his tapes again. He got regularly beat on a double move to the inside. Crawford, is effectively faster and has better ball skills. A healthy Crawford, is better than the KR the Irish had last year.
And that's an extremely questionable analysis of KVR. Yes, he wasn't as good in the off-man concepts as he was in Diaco's zone schemes, but it goes deeper than that. The problem is that what the scheme asked him to do at times was borderline impossible, not that he was playing bad or that he was a bad player. So if the scheme is the same and the coverage being asked of the CB is extremely difficult, why are we to think a 1st year player (or a vet that couldn't beat out KVR) is going to be better? In general, our pass defense last year was much better than most realize and the biggest issue was not play from either of our CBs.
I get why people want to be optimistic, but taking 4-5 NFL players off the defense and pretending like it's going to be decidedly better seems to be expecting a lot.
You don't think there are as many coming up as we lost? I think there are more!
For example, I believe we have three quarterbacks that will find a home in the NFL.