NDgradstudent
Banned
- Messages
- 2,414
- Reaction score
- 165
I think you are talking about the one they called on Ryan?
For most of the shooting fouls called on us this half we haven't touched them.
I think you are talking about the one they called on Ryan?
For most of the shooting fouls called on us this half we haven't touched them.
Vast just took the dumbest shoot I have seen in basketball in a long time.
Up hill battle now. Not the same team as the first half.
If this is in South Bend, we're up 10.
Hart has gotten some bullshit calls on drives, and literally holds EVERY play when they switch on Colson. It's not even questionable. He puts an arm around him.
Great game so far by ND. Officials have completely taken away the ability to defend Hart.
The last 6 of his points he pretty much went up the lane unopposed.
The last 6 of his points he pretty much went up the lane unopposed.
"Hi. I'm first half Brey and I have DirecTV."
"Hi. I'm second half Brey and I'm Brian Kelly."
Brey needs to learn how to grumble about the officiating too. It changed the game, even that is not an "excuse" for losing/poor play.
That's Villanova we're playing. That isn't losing/poor play. That was pretty good play against a team that had a top 10 player that could do whatever he wanted on both ends without repercussion. We didn't play bad. We didn't play good enough. And we didn't get much help.
You play that at a true neutral site or at ND, we win that game.
The bigger picture takeaway from this game is that the program is in a very good place. Recruiting has picked up, the team looks pretty good even though this is a "down" year, players seem to be developing, etc. A contrast to a certain other ND program, as many have noted.
Now if we can just get working on that fancy practice facility (like Villanova has)...I think we can definitely start signing a top 20 class each year. And then we can really take off.
The bigger picture takeaway from this game is that the program is in a very good place. Recruiting has picked up, the team looks pretty good even though this is a "down" year, players seem to be developing, etc. A contrast to a certain other ND program, as many have noted.
Now if we can just get working on that fancy practice facility (like Villanova has)...I think we can definitely start signing a top 20 class each year. And then we can really take off.
Completely agree.
Next week will give us a sneak peak into our game against North Carolina. I think we beat Purdue. I think we'll give up a bunch in the post, but I think we'll be able to outscore them. Let's not pretend that Villanova, as a #1, wasn't a perfect match-up for us. Next weeks game won't be near as fun to watch, but I think we win. UNC has much better perimeter players, but it should show us a bit of how we're going to play them.
I will say this, because it brings me joy, how wrong sites like NDNation were on Matt Farrell. .
This ND team just doesn't have the athleticism nor the dependable big man down low it's had. I'm afraid they are just a really good mid-major type team like Wichita was or a typical Butler team. Don't take that as a slight, cuz it's not.
Nova's not the perfect match up for ND either. They're better and bigger athletically and ran 8 guys at you that won a NC last year. More athletic, size and experience is tough to overcome.
Purdue is a 50-50. Their guards have been playing much better than I though they would. Freshman Carson Edwards is for real. Colson and Swanigan are going to be fun to watch.
Completely agree.
Next week will give us a sneak peak into our game against North Carolina. I think we beat Purdue. I think we'll give up a bunch in the post, but I think we'll be able to outscore them. Let's not pretend that Villanova, as a #1, wasn't a perfect match-up for us. Next weeks game won't be near as fun to watch, but I think we win. UNC has much better perimeter players, but it should show us a bit of how we're going to play them.
I will say this, because it brings me joy, how wrong sites like NDNation were on Matt Farrell. I'm sure they've cleared their tracks, they like to nuke boards because of how foolish they look, but it used to make comments about Farrell as if he was a DIII player. They were just flat-out terrible to him, and played it off as gospel.
He is our best offensive player. I know, blasphemy with Colson on the team, but Colson depends on match-ups. Farrell took a team full of guards in Villanova and did what he wanted with them before the tweaked ankle. He was unbelievable (and didn't get every touch foul like Hart did).
We are really, really good. I just question how we will match up with the upper 2 teams in the ACC.
The Farrell critics (and I was one) were not "wrong" about Matt Farrell. He flat out was bad last year. Did not look like he belonged on a D-I team. Anyone who thought he would be this good this year was basing it off nothing but homerism.
The kid has been balling out and I'm glad he turned things around so much.