Well I said low 4

so 90-92 rating... he's a 91.85 right now in composite.
Let me phrase my question better... I'm not sure where we disagree, except on the qualitative stuff. I said he does not appear to be the most fluid athlete, which is a common criticism of guys with "track speed." You think he is. But we both think his rating is accurate?
I guess the only difference is that I think he has some hypothetical flaws/red flags that give him a really low floor. You don't think he has the same basement.