- Messages
- 33,950
- Reaction score
- 9,295
Really hope he takes that leap this year
I think he can if Long, BK, and Wimbush are smart.
Just for one year, we should go back to the Charlie Weis offense: Run, Run, 50/50 Deep Ball
Let the RB’s do what they can, then chuck it up to Boykin and Claypool down the field and let them do their thing.
(Of course I’m over-stating my position... I just think the 50/50 ball needs to be a much larger part of the offense for the next year. Limiting Boykin and Claypool by not giving them those chances, and asking Wimbush to be a pinpoint passer rather than encouraging him to take some chances on those throws, would be putting a bunch of square pegs into round holes.)
Really hope he takes that leap this year
Just a thought, with the emergence of Book and Boykin's skillset has really brought back perhaps the least exciting football play, THE BUBBLE SCREEN.
It has at times been a big part of Kelly's playbook, and often times instead of going to the more typical quick, make-you-miss kind of player, has gone to big bodied receivers. Players that in one on one situations could be relied upon to drag a smaller corner/fall forward for 3-5 yards. Notable were the screens to Michael Floyd and Cory Robinson.
With Wimbush under center he couldn't consistently get it out accurately enough to make the bubble screen screen work. Now that play is back in the playbook.
I think he can if Long, BK, and Wimbush are smart.
Just for one year, we should go back to the Charlie Weis offense: Run, Run, 50/50 Deep Ball
Let the RB’s do what they can, then chuck it up to Boykin and Claypool down the field and let them do their thing.
(Of course I’m over-stating my position... I just think the 50/50 ball needs to be a much larger part of the offense for the next year. Limiting Boykin and Claypool by not giving them those chances, and asking Wimbush to be a pinpoint passer rather than encouraging him to take some chances on those throws, would be putting a bunch of square pegs into round holes.)
I very much agree, to a point. A good team will sniff that out and audible to a Bobby D special. A bend don't break defense will suffocate a team that breathes that way.
We do need more 50/50 and deep shots because it fits the personnel but we need to be continually pushing Wimbush to develop on the simple swing passes and getting comfortable going through his reads.
The game plan will determine everything. The good news is, Wimbush has already built up some cache as a legit threat to run so hopefully early defensive plans will be built on stopping that.
I think we will see a different BW this year behind center, to what degree will be dependent on the WR group. Using the example above, if Boykin and Claypool go up and grab those balls more often the not, the confidence will be there. I don't care who you are, when you know you have a 50/50 shot of being bailed out no matter what, you become more confident and take more chances.
BW will settle down on the short routes, the swing passes and the tuck and carry plays. He will have more confidence that when backed into a situation, he has 2 WR on the field that will bail him out. It then just comes down to which read is open.
IMO
![]()
Miles has found time to attend the Cam McDaniel School of Photogenics between all his TD receptions this year.
Obviously Book has something to do with this. But.... I once said, when Boykin and ESB were recruited in the same class, that ESB was the better talent. Still think he was/is. However, Boykin seems to just care more. And that matters. It matters to this team and it matters to this season.
I'm listening to an old II podcast (from before the Pitt game) and Tim et al. seem to think Boykin won't be around next year.
Is this a common sentiment? Because I think it'd be a mistake.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I was confused by that also. He's becoming a very good college WR but wouldn't think he'd test well so probably a mid-late round pick. Not sure why they think he won't be back.