- Messages
- 33,950
- Reaction score
- 9,295
Incorrect. Staff did the right thing, they didn’t want Watkins to leave and didn’t force him out but they were honest with him and that honesty led him to find the best path for himself. There’s some hurt feelings on both ends but at the end of the day everyone did what’s right. ND didn’t mislead Watkins, they informed him his role would be a little different and Nick decided that it would be better to find a more permanent role elsewhere. Pride is ready to take a huge step forward, Vaughn will be a great #3 and Crawford is all the way back and dynamite in the slot. ND will be in very good shape at Corner and hopefully Watkins has a great SR year elsewhere and realizes his NFL dreams. You don’t mislead trick guys into mortgaging their future to make you team a little better. That will ultimately have serious long term negative ramifications.
Incorrect? That I would start a 5th yr Sr. that has played as well as and better than the rising Jr has through this spring's practices? If you guys are under the assumption Pride has completely distanced himself from Watkins you are in complete disagreement with those who've watched spring practice... Some even said he was the best corner. Yeah, I'm old school. I start my Sr. if it's close and then give the underclassmen the snaps they earn.
I think the point is that Kelly tried to placate Zaire and not just come right out and name a starter is what he is getting at. That fits more with the theme of the thread. BK needed to just be honest with Zaire and make DK the starter. The handling of this situation is the correct way to do this.
Completely different situation. Corners rotate and share snaps every game. Qb's don't.